Cargando…

Critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples

Sensors, ranging from in vivo through to single-use systems, employ protective membranes or hydrogels to enhance sample collection or serve as filters, to immobilize or entrap probes or receptors, or to stabilize and enhance a sensor’s lifetime. Furthermore, many applications demand specific require...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bauer, Meike, Duerkop, Axel, Baeumner, Antje J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36280625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04363-2
_version_ 1784864497658232832
author Bauer, Meike
Duerkop, Axel
Baeumner, Antje J.
author_facet Bauer, Meike
Duerkop, Axel
Baeumner, Antje J.
author_sort Bauer, Meike
collection PubMed
description Sensors, ranging from in vivo through to single-use systems, employ protective membranes or hydrogels to enhance sample collection or serve as filters, to immobilize or entrap probes or receptors, or to stabilize and enhance a sensor’s lifetime. Furthermore, many applications demand specific requirements such as biocompatibility and non-fouling properties for in vivo applications, or fast and inexpensive mass production capabilities for single-use sensors. We critically evaluated how membrane materials and their deposition methods impact optical and electrochemical systems with special focus on analytical figures of merit and potential toward large-scale production. With some chosen examples, we highlight the fact that often a sensor’s performance relies heavily on the deposition method, even though other methods or materials could in fact improve the sensor. Over the course of the last 5 years, most sensing applications within healthcare diagnostics included glucose, lactate, uric acid, O(2), H(+) ions, and many specific metabolites and markers. In the case of food safety and environmental monitoring, the choice of analytes was much more comprehensive regarding a variety of natural and synthetic toxicants like bacteria, pesticides, or pollutants and other relevant substances. We conclude that more attention must be paid toward deposition techniques as these may in the end become a major hurdle in a sensor’s likelihood of moving from an academic lab into a real-world product. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9816278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98162782023-01-07 Critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples Bauer, Meike Duerkop, Axel Baeumner, Antje J. Anal Bioanal Chem Review Sensors, ranging from in vivo through to single-use systems, employ protective membranes or hydrogels to enhance sample collection or serve as filters, to immobilize or entrap probes or receptors, or to stabilize and enhance a sensor’s lifetime. Furthermore, many applications demand specific requirements such as biocompatibility and non-fouling properties for in vivo applications, or fast and inexpensive mass production capabilities for single-use sensors. We critically evaluated how membrane materials and their deposition methods impact optical and electrochemical systems with special focus on analytical figures of merit and potential toward large-scale production. With some chosen examples, we highlight the fact that often a sensor’s performance relies heavily on the deposition method, even though other methods or materials could in fact improve the sensor. Over the course of the last 5 years, most sensing applications within healthcare diagnostics included glucose, lactate, uric acid, O(2), H(+) ions, and many specific metabolites and markers. In the case of food safety and environmental monitoring, the choice of analytes was much more comprehensive regarding a variety of natural and synthetic toxicants like bacteria, pesticides, or pollutants and other relevant substances. We conclude that more attention must be paid toward deposition techniques as these may in the end become a major hurdle in a sensor’s likelihood of moving from an academic lab into a real-world product. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9816278/ /pubmed/36280625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04363-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Bauer, Meike
Duerkop, Axel
Baeumner, Antje J.
Critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples
title Critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples
title_full Critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples
title_fullStr Critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples
title_full_unstemmed Critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples
title_short Critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples
title_sort critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36280625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04363-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bauermeike criticalreviewofpolymerandhydrogeldepositionmethodsforopticalandelectrochemicalbioanalyticalsensorscorrelatedtothesensorsapplicabilityinrealsamples
AT duerkopaxel criticalreviewofpolymerandhydrogeldepositionmethodsforopticalandelectrochemicalbioanalyticalsensorscorrelatedtothesensorsapplicabilityinrealsamples
AT baeumnerantjej criticalreviewofpolymerandhydrogeldepositionmethodsforopticalandelectrochemicalbioanalyticalsensorscorrelatedtothesensorsapplicabilityinrealsamples