Cargando…
Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care
BACKGROUND: Early palliative care (PC) has shown beneficial effects for advanced cancer patients. However, it is still debated what criteria to use to identify patients for PC referral. AIM: To document the initial steps of the development of the Palliative Care Referral System (PCRS), a tool to be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01094-0 |
_version_ | 1784864514601123840 |
---|---|
author | Pigni, Alessandra Alfieri, Sara Caraceni, Augusto Tommaso Zecca, Ernesto Fusetti, Viviana Tallarita, Antonino Brunelli, Cinzia |
author_facet | Pigni, Alessandra Alfieri, Sara Caraceni, Augusto Tommaso Zecca, Ernesto Fusetti, Viviana Tallarita, Antonino Brunelli, Cinzia |
author_sort | Pigni, Alessandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early palliative care (PC) has shown beneficial effects for advanced cancer patients. However, it is still debated what criteria to use to identify patients for PC referral. AIM: To document the initial steps of the development of the Palliative Care Referral System (PCRS), a tool to be used by oncologists in clinical practice. METHODS: A multiprofessional working group developed the PCRS based on the results of a scoping literature review on PC referral criteria. PCRS criteria were evaluated by experts via a nominal group technique (NGT). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize expert scores on relevance, appropriateness and perceived feasibility of the criteria proposed. Quotations of participants during the discussion were also reported. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, including PC referral criteria/tools, emerged from the scoping review. Severe symptoms, poor performance status, comorbidities and prognosis were the most commonly used criteria. The PCRS included nine major criteria and nine assessment methods; a scoring procedure was also proposed. Answers to the questionnaire during the NGT showed that five criteria reached full agreement on all items, while four did not, and were then discussed within the group. Participants agreed on the relevance of all criteria and on the appropriateness of methods proposed to assess most of them, while issues were raised about potential feasibility of the overall assessment of the PCRS in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The PCRS has been developed as an help for oncologists to timely identify patients for specialized PC referral. Since feasibility emerged as the main concern, implementation strategies have to be tested in subsequent studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9816370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98163702023-01-06 Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care Pigni, Alessandra Alfieri, Sara Caraceni, Augusto Tommaso Zecca, Ernesto Fusetti, Viviana Tallarita, Antonino Brunelli, Cinzia BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: Early palliative care (PC) has shown beneficial effects for advanced cancer patients. However, it is still debated what criteria to use to identify patients for PC referral. AIM: To document the initial steps of the development of the Palliative Care Referral System (PCRS), a tool to be used by oncologists in clinical practice. METHODS: A multiprofessional working group developed the PCRS based on the results of a scoping literature review on PC referral criteria. PCRS criteria were evaluated by experts via a nominal group technique (NGT). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize expert scores on relevance, appropriateness and perceived feasibility of the criteria proposed. Quotations of participants during the discussion were also reported. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, including PC referral criteria/tools, emerged from the scoping review. Severe symptoms, poor performance status, comorbidities and prognosis were the most commonly used criteria. The PCRS included nine major criteria and nine assessment methods; a scoring procedure was also proposed. Answers to the questionnaire during the NGT showed that five criteria reached full agreement on all items, while four did not, and were then discussed within the group. Participants agreed on the relevance of all criteria and on the appropriateness of methods proposed to assess most of them, while issues were raised about potential feasibility of the overall assessment of the PCRS in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The PCRS has been developed as an help for oncologists to timely identify patients for specialized PC referral. Since feasibility emerged as the main concern, implementation strategies have to be tested in subsequent studies. BioMed Central 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9816370/ /pubmed/36443700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01094-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pigni, Alessandra Alfieri, Sara Caraceni, Augusto Tommaso Zecca, Ernesto Fusetti, Viviana Tallarita, Antonino Brunelli, Cinzia Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care |
title | Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care |
title_full | Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care |
title_fullStr | Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care |
title_short | Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care |
title_sort | development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01094-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pignialessandra developmentofthepalliativecarereferralsystemproposalofatoolforthereferralofcancerpatientstospecializedpalliativecare AT alfierisara developmentofthepalliativecarereferralsystemproposalofatoolforthereferralofcancerpatientstospecializedpalliativecare AT caraceniaugustotommaso developmentofthepalliativecarereferralsystemproposalofatoolforthereferralofcancerpatientstospecializedpalliativecare AT zeccaernesto developmentofthepalliativecarereferralsystemproposalofatoolforthereferralofcancerpatientstospecializedpalliativecare AT fusettiviviana developmentofthepalliativecarereferralsystemproposalofatoolforthereferralofcancerpatientstospecializedpalliativecare AT tallaritaantonino developmentofthepalliativecarereferralsystemproposalofatoolforthereferralofcancerpatientstospecializedpalliativecare AT brunellicinzia developmentofthepalliativecarereferralsystemproposalofatoolforthereferralofcancerpatientstospecializedpalliativecare |