Cargando…

Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia

INTRODUCTION: Extremely premature infants are at high risk for developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). While noninvasive support is preferred, they may require ventilator support. Although volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) has been shown to be beneficial in preventing BPD, no data exists to gui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuevas Guaman, Milenka, Hagan, Joseph, Sabic, Dajana, Tillman, Davlyn M., Fernandes, Caraciolo J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.952376
_version_ 1784864516000972800
author Cuevas Guaman, Milenka
Hagan, Joseph
Sabic, Dajana
Tillman, Davlyn M.
Fernandes, Caraciolo J.
author_facet Cuevas Guaman, Milenka
Hagan, Joseph
Sabic, Dajana
Tillman, Davlyn M.
Fernandes, Caraciolo J.
author_sort Cuevas Guaman, Milenka
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Extremely premature infants are at high risk for developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). While noninvasive support is preferred, they may require ventilator support. Although volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) has been shown to be beneficial in preventing BPD, no data exists to guide ventilator management of infants with evolving BPD. Thus, clinicians employ a host of ventilator strategies, traditionally time-cycled pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) and more recently volume-guarantee ventilation (VGV) (a form of VTV). In this study, we sought to test the hypothesis that use of VGV in evolving BPD is associated with improved clinical and pulmonary outcomes when compared with PLV. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort review of premature infants born less than 28 weeks inborn to a Level 4 NICU from January 2015 to December 2020. Data abstracted included demographics, maternal and birth data, and ventilator data until death or discharge. Exposure to either VGV or PLV was also examined, including ventilator “dose” (number of time points from DOL 14, 21 and 28 the patient was on that particular ventilator) during the period of evolving BPD. RESULTS: Of a total of 471 patients with ventilation data available on DOL 14, 268 were not ventilated and 203 were ventilated. PLV at DOL 21 and 28 was associated with significantly higher risk of BPD and the composite outcome of BPD or death before 36 weeks compared to VGV. Both increasing VGV and PLV doses were significantly associated with higher odds of BPD and the composite outcome. For each additional time point of VGV and PLV exposure, the predicted length of stay (LOS) increased by 15.3 days (p < 0.001) and 28.8 days (p < 0.001), respectively. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates the association of use of VGV at DOL 21 and 28 with decreased risk of BPD compared to use of PLV. Prospective trials are needed to further delineate the most effective ventilatory modality for this population with “evolving” BPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9816376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98163762023-01-07 Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia Cuevas Guaman, Milenka Hagan, Joseph Sabic, Dajana Tillman, Davlyn M. Fernandes, Caraciolo J. Front Pediatr Pediatrics INTRODUCTION: Extremely premature infants are at high risk for developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). While noninvasive support is preferred, they may require ventilator support. Although volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) has been shown to be beneficial in preventing BPD, no data exists to guide ventilator management of infants with evolving BPD. Thus, clinicians employ a host of ventilator strategies, traditionally time-cycled pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) and more recently volume-guarantee ventilation (VGV) (a form of VTV). In this study, we sought to test the hypothesis that use of VGV in evolving BPD is associated with improved clinical and pulmonary outcomes when compared with PLV. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort review of premature infants born less than 28 weeks inborn to a Level 4 NICU from January 2015 to December 2020. Data abstracted included demographics, maternal and birth data, and ventilator data until death or discharge. Exposure to either VGV or PLV was also examined, including ventilator “dose” (number of time points from DOL 14, 21 and 28 the patient was on that particular ventilator) during the period of evolving BPD. RESULTS: Of a total of 471 patients with ventilation data available on DOL 14, 268 were not ventilated and 203 were ventilated. PLV at DOL 21 and 28 was associated with significantly higher risk of BPD and the composite outcome of BPD or death before 36 weeks compared to VGV. Both increasing VGV and PLV doses were significantly associated with higher odds of BPD and the composite outcome. For each additional time point of VGV and PLV exposure, the predicted length of stay (LOS) increased by 15.3 days (p < 0.001) and 28.8 days (p < 0.001), respectively. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates the association of use of VGV at DOL 21 and 28 with decreased risk of BPD compared to use of PLV. Prospective trials are needed to further delineate the most effective ventilatory modality for this population with “evolving” BPD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9816376/ /pubmed/36619499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.952376 Text en © 2022 Cuevas Guaman, Hagan, Sabic, Tillman and Fernandes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Cuevas Guaman, Milenka
Hagan, Joseph
Sabic, Dajana
Tillman, Davlyn M.
Fernandes, Caraciolo J.
Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia
title Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia
title_full Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia
title_fullStr Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia
title_full_unstemmed Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia
title_short Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia
title_sort volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.952376
work_keys_str_mv AT cuevasguamanmilenka volumeguaranteevspressurelimitedventilationinevolvingbronchopulmonarydysplasia
AT haganjoseph volumeguaranteevspressurelimitedventilationinevolvingbronchopulmonarydysplasia
AT sabicdajana volumeguaranteevspressurelimitedventilationinevolvingbronchopulmonarydysplasia
AT tillmandavlynm volumeguaranteevspressurelimitedventilationinevolvingbronchopulmonarydysplasia
AT fernandescaracioloj volumeguaranteevspressurelimitedventilationinevolvingbronchopulmonarydysplasia