Cargando…
Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic
BACKGROUND: Long-lasting crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, require proper interim evaluation in order to optimize response. The World Health Organization and the European Center for Disease Control have recently promoted the in(tra)-action review (IAR) method for this purpose. We systematically...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14706-4 |
_version_ | 1784864551253049344 |
---|---|
author | de Rooij, Doret van de Watering, Miriam van Dijk, Remco Veenstra, Thijs Appels, Rolf Swaan, Corien Timen, Aura |
author_facet | de Rooij, Doret van de Watering, Miriam van Dijk, Remco Veenstra, Thijs Appels, Rolf Swaan, Corien Timen, Aura |
author_sort | de Rooij, Doret |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Long-lasting crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, require proper interim evaluation in order to optimize response. The World Health Organization and the European Center for Disease Control have recently promoted the in(tra)-action review (IAR) method for this purpose. We systematically evaluated the added value of two IARs performed in the Dutch point of entry (PoE) setting. METHODS: Two online, 4-hour IAR meetings were organized in March 2021, for ports and airports respectively, to reflect on the ongoing COVID-19 response. Topics discussed were selected through a survey among participants. Participants were mainly self-selected by the (air)port public health service. Evaluation of the IAR method consisted of participant evaluation through a questionnaire, and hot and cold debriefs of the organizing team. Evaluation of the impact of the IAR was done through analysis of the meeting results, and a 3-month follow-up of the actions proposed during the meetings. RESULTS: Thirty-nine professionals joined the IAR meetings. In the participant evaluation (n = 18), 89% agreed or totally agreed the IAR made it possible to identify challenges and problems in the COVID-19 response at PoE. Participants especially appreciated the resulting insight in regional and national partners. Regarding the online setting of the meeting, participants suggested to choose accessible and familiar online tools. After 3 months, all national actions and actions for ports had been executed; some regional actions for airports required further attention. A major result was a new meeting structure for all ports and the participating national authorities in which remaining and newly occurring issues were discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evaluations, we conclude that the IAR method can be of value during long-term crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic response. Although it is challenging to dedicate time and effort to the organization and attendance of IAR meetings during crisis, the IAR method is feasible in an online setting if appropriate organizing and technical capacity is available. A participatory set-up supports the IAR method as a starting point for continuous exchange and learning during ongoing crises. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14706-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9816518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98165182023-01-06 Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic de Rooij, Doret van de Watering, Miriam van Dijk, Remco Veenstra, Thijs Appels, Rolf Swaan, Corien Timen, Aura BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Long-lasting crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, require proper interim evaluation in order to optimize response. The World Health Organization and the European Center for Disease Control have recently promoted the in(tra)-action review (IAR) method for this purpose. We systematically evaluated the added value of two IARs performed in the Dutch point of entry (PoE) setting. METHODS: Two online, 4-hour IAR meetings were organized in March 2021, for ports and airports respectively, to reflect on the ongoing COVID-19 response. Topics discussed were selected through a survey among participants. Participants were mainly self-selected by the (air)port public health service. Evaluation of the IAR method consisted of participant evaluation through a questionnaire, and hot and cold debriefs of the organizing team. Evaluation of the impact of the IAR was done through analysis of the meeting results, and a 3-month follow-up of the actions proposed during the meetings. RESULTS: Thirty-nine professionals joined the IAR meetings. In the participant evaluation (n = 18), 89% agreed or totally agreed the IAR made it possible to identify challenges and problems in the COVID-19 response at PoE. Participants especially appreciated the resulting insight in regional and national partners. Regarding the online setting of the meeting, participants suggested to choose accessible and familiar online tools. After 3 months, all national actions and actions for ports had been executed; some regional actions for airports required further attention. A major result was a new meeting structure for all ports and the participating national authorities in which remaining and newly occurring issues were discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evaluations, we conclude that the IAR method can be of value during long-term crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic response. Although it is challenging to dedicate time and effort to the organization and attendance of IAR meetings during crisis, the IAR method is feasible in an online setting if appropriate organizing and technical capacity is available. A participatory set-up supports the IAR method as a starting point for continuous exchange and learning during ongoing crises. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14706-4. BioMed Central 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9816518/ /pubmed/36609235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14706-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research de Rooij, Doret van de Watering, Miriam van Dijk, Remco Veenstra, Thijs Appels, Rolf Swaan, Corien Timen, Aura Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14706-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derooijdoret evaluatingintraactionreviewsatpointsofentryongoinglearningopportunitiesduringthecovid19pandemic AT vandewateringmiriam evaluatingintraactionreviewsatpointsofentryongoinglearningopportunitiesduringthecovid19pandemic AT vandijkremco evaluatingintraactionreviewsatpointsofentryongoinglearningopportunitiesduringthecovid19pandemic AT veenstrathijs evaluatingintraactionreviewsatpointsofentryongoinglearningopportunitiesduringthecovid19pandemic AT appelsrolf evaluatingintraactionreviewsatpointsofentryongoinglearningopportunitiesduringthecovid19pandemic AT swaancorien evaluatingintraactionreviewsatpointsofentryongoinglearningopportunitiesduringthecovid19pandemic AT timenaura evaluatingintraactionreviewsatpointsofentryongoinglearningopportunitiesduringthecovid19pandemic |