Cargando…
Evaluation and Comparation of a Novel Surgical Technique and Hemivertebra Resection to the Correction of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis in Lower Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine
OBJECTIVE: To report concave-side distraction technique to treat congenital cervical scoliosis in lower cervical and cervicothoracic spine. To evaluate and compare clinical and radiographic results of this procedure with classic hemivertebra resection procedure. METHODS: This study reviewed 29 patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397249 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244554.277 |
_version_ | 1784864567810064384 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Shuo Chen, Xin Pan, Shengfa Diao, Yinze Zhao, Yanbin Xia, Tian Li, Weishi Zhou, Feifei Sun, Yu |
author_facet | Cao, Shuo Chen, Xin Pan, Shengfa Diao, Yinze Zhao, Yanbin Xia, Tian Li, Weishi Zhou, Feifei Sun, Yu |
author_sort | Cao, Shuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To report concave-side distraction technique to treat congenital cervical scoliosis in lower cervical and cervicothoracic spine. To evaluate and compare clinical and radiographic results of this procedure with classic hemivertebra resection procedure. METHODS: This study reviewed 29 patients in last 13 years. These patients were divided into convex-side resection group (group R) and concave-side distraction group (group D). Radiographic assessment was based on parameter changes preoperatively, postoperatively and at last follow-up. Demographic data, surgical data and complications were also evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In group R, mean age was 8.9 ± 3.3 years and follow-up was 46 ± 18 months. Operation time and blood loss averaged 500 ± 100 minutes, 703 ± 367 mL. In group D, mean age was 9.9 ± 2.8 years and follow-up was 34 ± 14 months. Operation time and blood loss averaged 501 ± 112 minutes, 374 ± 181 mL. Structural Cobb angle was corrected from 29.4° ± 12.5° to 5.3° (2.1°–18.1°) (p = 0.001) and 33.7° ± 14.1° to 12.8° ± 11.4° (p < 0.001) in groups R and D. Compensatory Cobb angle had a spontaneous correction rate of 59.6% (40.0%–80.8%) and 59.7% ± 23.0% in groups R and D. Mandibular incline, clavicle angle and spine coronal balance were significantly improved at last follow-up in both groups. All correction rates were not statistically different between groups. However, group D had significant less blood loss (p < 0.001) and operation time (p = 0.004) per vertebra than group R. Seven patients developed C5 nerve root palsy and recovered by 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both surgical procedures are safe and effective in correcting congenital cervical scoliosis. But concave-side distraction technique has less blood loss and time-consuming during surgery, which provides a better option for the treatment of congenital cervical scoliosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9816581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98165812023-01-11 Evaluation and Comparation of a Novel Surgical Technique and Hemivertebra Resection to the Correction of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis in Lower Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine Cao, Shuo Chen, Xin Pan, Shengfa Diao, Yinze Zhao, Yanbin Xia, Tian Li, Weishi Zhou, Feifei Sun, Yu Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: To report concave-side distraction technique to treat congenital cervical scoliosis in lower cervical and cervicothoracic spine. To evaluate and compare clinical and radiographic results of this procedure with classic hemivertebra resection procedure. METHODS: This study reviewed 29 patients in last 13 years. These patients were divided into convex-side resection group (group R) and concave-side distraction group (group D). Radiographic assessment was based on parameter changes preoperatively, postoperatively and at last follow-up. Demographic data, surgical data and complications were also evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In group R, mean age was 8.9 ± 3.3 years and follow-up was 46 ± 18 months. Operation time and blood loss averaged 500 ± 100 minutes, 703 ± 367 mL. In group D, mean age was 9.9 ± 2.8 years and follow-up was 34 ± 14 months. Operation time and blood loss averaged 501 ± 112 minutes, 374 ± 181 mL. Structural Cobb angle was corrected from 29.4° ± 12.5° to 5.3° (2.1°–18.1°) (p = 0.001) and 33.7° ± 14.1° to 12.8° ± 11.4° (p < 0.001) in groups R and D. Compensatory Cobb angle had a spontaneous correction rate of 59.6% (40.0%–80.8%) and 59.7% ± 23.0% in groups R and D. Mandibular incline, clavicle angle and spine coronal balance were significantly improved at last follow-up in both groups. All correction rates were not statistically different between groups. However, group D had significant less blood loss (p < 0.001) and operation time (p = 0.004) per vertebra than group R. Seven patients developed C5 nerve root palsy and recovered by 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both surgical procedures are safe and effective in correcting congenital cervical scoliosis. But concave-side distraction technique has less blood loss and time-consuming during surgery, which provides a better option for the treatment of congenital cervical scoliosis. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2022-12 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9816581/ /pubmed/36397249 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244554.277 Text en Copyright © 2022 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cao, Shuo Chen, Xin Pan, Shengfa Diao, Yinze Zhao, Yanbin Xia, Tian Li, Weishi Zhou, Feifei Sun, Yu Evaluation and Comparation of a Novel Surgical Technique and Hemivertebra Resection to the Correction of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis in Lower Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine |
title | Evaluation and Comparation of a Novel Surgical Technique and Hemivertebra Resection to the Correction of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis in Lower Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine |
title_full | Evaluation and Comparation of a Novel Surgical Technique and Hemivertebra Resection to the Correction of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis in Lower Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine |
title_fullStr | Evaluation and Comparation of a Novel Surgical Technique and Hemivertebra Resection to the Correction of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis in Lower Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and Comparation of a Novel Surgical Technique and Hemivertebra Resection to the Correction of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis in Lower Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine |
title_short | Evaluation and Comparation of a Novel Surgical Technique and Hemivertebra Resection to the Correction of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis in Lower Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine |
title_sort | evaluation and comparation of a novel surgical technique and hemivertebra resection to the correction of congenital cervical scoliosis in lower cervical and cervicothoracic spine |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397249 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244554.277 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoshuo evaluationandcomparationofanovelsurgicaltechniqueandhemivertebraresectiontothecorrectionofcongenitalcervicalscoliosisinlowercervicalandcervicothoracicspine AT chenxin evaluationandcomparationofanovelsurgicaltechniqueandhemivertebraresectiontothecorrectionofcongenitalcervicalscoliosisinlowercervicalandcervicothoracicspine AT panshengfa evaluationandcomparationofanovelsurgicaltechniqueandhemivertebraresectiontothecorrectionofcongenitalcervicalscoliosisinlowercervicalandcervicothoracicspine AT diaoyinze evaluationandcomparationofanovelsurgicaltechniqueandhemivertebraresectiontothecorrectionofcongenitalcervicalscoliosisinlowercervicalandcervicothoracicspine AT zhaoyanbin evaluationandcomparationofanovelsurgicaltechniqueandhemivertebraresectiontothecorrectionofcongenitalcervicalscoliosisinlowercervicalandcervicothoracicspine AT xiatian evaluationandcomparationofanovelsurgicaltechniqueandhemivertebraresectiontothecorrectionofcongenitalcervicalscoliosisinlowercervicalandcervicothoracicspine AT liweishi evaluationandcomparationofanovelsurgicaltechniqueandhemivertebraresectiontothecorrectionofcongenitalcervicalscoliosisinlowercervicalandcervicothoracicspine AT zhoufeifei evaluationandcomparationofanovelsurgicaltechniqueandhemivertebraresectiontothecorrectionofcongenitalcervicalscoliosisinlowercervicalandcervicothoracicspine AT sunyu evaluationandcomparationofanovelsurgicaltechniqueandhemivertebraresectiontothecorrectionofcongenitalcervicalscoliosisinlowercervicalandcervicothoracicspine |