Cargando…

Automated photographic analysis of inferior oblique overaction based on deep learning

BACKGROUND: Inferior oblique overaction (IOOA) is a common ocular motility disorder. This study aimed to propose a novel deep learning-based approach to automatically evaluate the amount of IOOA. METHODS: This prospective study included 106 eyes of 72 consecutive patients attending the strabismus cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lou, Lixia, Huang, Xingru, Sun, Yiming, Cao, Jing, Wang, Yaqi, Zhang, Qianni, Tang, Xiajing, Ye, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620142
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-467
_version_ 1784864602160365568
author Lou, Lixia
Huang, Xingru
Sun, Yiming
Cao, Jing
Wang, Yaqi
Zhang, Qianni
Tang, Xiajing
Ye, Juan
author_facet Lou, Lixia
Huang, Xingru
Sun, Yiming
Cao, Jing
Wang, Yaqi
Zhang, Qianni
Tang, Xiajing
Ye, Juan
author_sort Lou, Lixia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inferior oblique overaction (IOOA) is a common ocular motility disorder. This study aimed to propose a novel deep learning-based approach to automatically evaluate the amount of IOOA. METHODS: This prospective study included 106 eyes of 72 consecutive patients attending the strabismus clinic in a tertiary referral hospital. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with IOOA. IOOA was clinically graded from +1 to +4. Based on photograph in the adducted position, the height difference between the inferior corneal limbus of both eyes was manually measured using ImageJ and automatically measured by our deep learning-based image analysis system with human supervision. Correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots and mean absolute deviation (MAD) were analyzed between two different measurements of evaluating IOOA. RESULTS: There were significant correlations between automated photographic measurements and clinical gradings (Kendall’s tau: 0.721; 95% confidence interval: 0.652 to 0.779; P<0.001), between automated and manual photographic measurements [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs): 0.975; 95% confidence interval: 0.963 to 0.983; P<0.001], and between two-repeated automated photographic measurements (ICCs: 0.998; 95% confidence interval: 0.997 to 0.999; P<0.001). The biases and MADs were 0.10 [95% limits of agreement (LoA): −0.45 to 0.64] mm and 0.26±0.14 mm between automated and manual photographic measurements, and 0.01 (95% LoA: −0.14 to 0.16) mm and 0.07±0.04 mm between two-repeated automated photographic measurements, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The automated photographic measurements of IOOA using deep learning technique were in excellent agreement with manual photographic measurements and clinical gradings. This new approach allows objective, accurate and repeatable measurement of IOOA and could be easily implemented in clinical practice using only photographs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9816726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98167262023-01-07 Automated photographic analysis of inferior oblique overaction based on deep learning Lou, Lixia Huang, Xingru Sun, Yiming Cao, Jing Wang, Yaqi Zhang, Qianni Tang, Xiajing Ye, Juan Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Inferior oblique overaction (IOOA) is a common ocular motility disorder. This study aimed to propose a novel deep learning-based approach to automatically evaluate the amount of IOOA. METHODS: This prospective study included 106 eyes of 72 consecutive patients attending the strabismus clinic in a tertiary referral hospital. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with IOOA. IOOA was clinically graded from +1 to +4. Based on photograph in the adducted position, the height difference between the inferior corneal limbus of both eyes was manually measured using ImageJ and automatically measured by our deep learning-based image analysis system with human supervision. Correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots and mean absolute deviation (MAD) were analyzed between two different measurements of evaluating IOOA. RESULTS: There were significant correlations between automated photographic measurements and clinical gradings (Kendall’s tau: 0.721; 95% confidence interval: 0.652 to 0.779; P<0.001), between automated and manual photographic measurements [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs): 0.975; 95% confidence interval: 0.963 to 0.983; P<0.001], and between two-repeated automated photographic measurements (ICCs: 0.998; 95% confidence interval: 0.997 to 0.999; P<0.001). The biases and MADs were 0.10 [95% limits of agreement (LoA): −0.45 to 0.64] mm and 0.26±0.14 mm between automated and manual photographic measurements, and 0.01 (95% LoA: −0.14 to 0.16) mm and 0.07±0.04 mm between two-repeated automated photographic measurements, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The automated photographic measurements of IOOA using deep learning technique were in excellent agreement with manual photographic measurements and clinical gradings. This new approach allows objective, accurate and repeatable measurement of IOOA and could be easily implemented in clinical practice using only photographs. AME Publishing Company 2022-10-28 2023-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9816726/ /pubmed/36620142 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-467 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lou, Lixia
Huang, Xingru
Sun, Yiming
Cao, Jing
Wang, Yaqi
Zhang, Qianni
Tang, Xiajing
Ye, Juan
Automated photographic analysis of inferior oblique overaction based on deep learning
title Automated photographic analysis of inferior oblique overaction based on deep learning
title_full Automated photographic analysis of inferior oblique overaction based on deep learning
title_fullStr Automated photographic analysis of inferior oblique overaction based on deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Automated photographic analysis of inferior oblique overaction based on deep learning
title_short Automated photographic analysis of inferior oblique overaction based on deep learning
title_sort automated photographic analysis of inferior oblique overaction based on deep learning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620142
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-467
work_keys_str_mv AT loulixia automatedphotographicanalysisofinferiorobliqueoveractionbasedondeeplearning
AT huangxingru automatedphotographicanalysisofinferiorobliqueoveractionbasedondeeplearning
AT sunyiming automatedphotographicanalysisofinferiorobliqueoveractionbasedondeeplearning
AT caojing automatedphotographicanalysisofinferiorobliqueoveractionbasedondeeplearning
AT wangyaqi automatedphotographicanalysisofinferiorobliqueoveractionbasedondeeplearning
AT zhangqianni automatedphotographicanalysisofinferiorobliqueoveractionbasedondeeplearning
AT tangxiajing automatedphotographicanalysisofinferiorobliqueoveractionbasedondeeplearning
AT yejuan automatedphotographicanalysisofinferiorobliqueoveractionbasedondeeplearning