Cargando…

A comparative study about attitudes towards the efficiency, effectiveness, and atmosphere of offline and online learning among medical students

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, the mode of education has changed, and online learning via the Internet has gradually entered the medical education system. During the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, online learning rapidly became one of the main learning methods for medical students, this has impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiao, Zhiqiao, Yang, Yongjie, Zhang, Shuai, Xu, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36618795
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5112
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In recent decades, the mode of education has changed, and online learning via the Internet has gradually entered the medical education system. During the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, online learning rapidly became one of the main learning methods for medical students, this has impacted medical undergraduates and postgraduates to varying degrees; however, currently, little is known about its effectiveness as a learning mode. METHODS: This study included undergraduates and postgraduates in medical schools at some universities in China. The student participants were asked to complete a questionnaire survey in which they self-evaluated the learning effectiveness, learning efficiency, learning atmosphere, and other issues associated with online and offline learning. SPSSAU was used to analyze the acquired data. RESULTS: Most medical students expressed the view that offline learning was superior to online learning in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and atmosphere. However, online learning was better in terms of the acquisition of learning resources and flexibility. The attitudes of medical undergraduates and postgraduates participating in this research were largely similar (P>0.05); however, undergraduates placed a higher value on offline learning than postgraduates (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both online and offline learning have advantages and disadvantages. The differences between undergraduates and postgraduates may be related to subtle differences in the training objectives at these 2 levels of medical education. Combining the advantages of online and offline learning may improve the learning of medical students.