Cargando…

Validation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements using a fully automated body composition analysis neural network versus a semi-automatic reference program with human correction in patients with lung cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To validate skeletal muscle and adipose tissues cross sectional area (CSA) and densities between a fully automated neural network (test program) and a semi-automated program requiring human correction (reference program) for lumbar 1 (L1) and lumbar 2 (L2) CT scans in patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byrne, Cecily A., Zhang, Yanyu, Fantuzzi, Giamila, Geesey, Thomas, Shah, Palmi, Gomez, Sandra L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12536
_version_ 1784864660386742272
author Byrne, Cecily A.
Zhang, Yanyu
Fantuzzi, Giamila
Geesey, Thomas
Shah, Palmi
Gomez, Sandra L.
author_facet Byrne, Cecily A.
Zhang, Yanyu
Fantuzzi, Giamila
Geesey, Thomas
Shah, Palmi
Gomez, Sandra L.
author_sort Byrne, Cecily A.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To validate skeletal muscle and adipose tissues cross sectional area (CSA) and densities between a fully automated neural network (test program) and a semi-automated program requiring human correction (reference program) for lumbar 1 (L1) and lumbar 2 (L2) CT scans in patients with lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Agreement between the reference and test programs was measured using Dice-similarity coefficient (DSC) and Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement within 1.96 standard deviation. RESULTS: A total of 49 L1 and 47 L2 images were analyzed from patients with lung cancer (mean age = 70.51 ± 9.48 years; mean BMI = 27.45 ± 6.06 kg/m(2); 71% female, 55% self-identified as Black and 96% as non-Hispanic ethnicity). The DSC indicates excellent overlap (>0.944) or agreement between the two measurement methods for muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) CSA and all tissue densities at L1 and L2. The DSC was lowest for intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) CSA at L1 (0.889) and L2 (0.919). CONCLUSION: The use of a fully automated neural network to analyze body composition at L1 and L2 in patients with lung cancer is valid for measuring skeletal muscle and adipose tissue CSA and densities when compared to a reference program. Further validation in a more diverse sample and in different disease and health states is warranted to increase the generalizability of the test program at L1 and L2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9816970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98169702023-01-07 Validation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements using a fully automated body composition analysis neural network versus a semi-automatic reference program with human correction in patients with lung cancer Byrne, Cecily A. Zhang, Yanyu Fantuzzi, Giamila Geesey, Thomas Shah, Palmi Gomez, Sandra L. Heliyon Research Article RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To validate skeletal muscle and adipose tissues cross sectional area (CSA) and densities between a fully automated neural network (test program) and a semi-automated program requiring human correction (reference program) for lumbar 1 (L1) and lumbar 2 (L2) CT scans in patients with lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Agreement between the reference and test programs was measured using Dice-similarity coefficient (DSC) and Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement within 1.96 standard deviation. RESULTS: A total of 49 L1 and 47 L2 images were analyzed from patients with lung cancer (mean age = 70.51 ± 9.48 years; mean BMI = 27.45 ± 6.06 kg/m(2); 71% female, 55% self-identified as Black and 96% as non-Hispanic ethnicity). The DSC indicates excellent overlap (>0.944) or agreement between the two measurement methods for muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) CSA and all tissue densities at L1 and L2. The DSC was lowest for intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) CSA at L1 (0.889) and L2 (0.919). CONCLUSION: The use of a fully automated neural network to analyze body composition at L1 and L2 in patients with lung cancer is valid for measuring skeletal muscle and adipose tissue CSA and densities when compared to a reference program. Further validation in a more diverse sample and in different disease and health states is warranted to increase the generalizability of the test program at L1 and L2. Elsevier 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9816970/ /pubmed/36619471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12536 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Byrne, Cecily A.
Zhang, Yanyu
Fantuzzi, Giamila
Geesey, Thomas
Shah, Palmi
Gomez, Sandra L.
Validation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements using a fully automated body composition analysis neural network versus a semi-automatic reference program with human correction in patients with lung cancer
title Validation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements using a fully automated body composition analysis neural network versus a semi-automatic reference program with human correction in patients with lung cancer
title_full Validation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements using a fully automated body composition analysis neural network versus a semi-automatic reference program with human correction in patients with lung cancer
title_fullStr Validation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements using a fully automated body composition analysis neural network versus a semi-automatic reference program with human correction in patients with lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Validation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements using a fully automated body composition analysis neural network versus a semi-automatic reference program with human correction in patients with lung cancer
title_short Validation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements using a fully automated body composition analysis neural network versus a semi-automatic reference program with human correction in patients with lung cancer
title_sort validation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements using a fully automated body composition analysis neural network versus a semi-automatic reference program with human correction in patients with lung cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12536
work_keys_str_mv AT byrnececilya validationofskeletalmuscleandadiposetissuemeasurementsusingafullyautomatedbodycompositionanalysisneuralnetworkversusasemiautomaticreferenceprogramwithhumancorrectioninpatientswithlungcancer
AT zhangyanyu validationofskeletalmuscleandadiposetissuemeasurementsusingafullyautomatedbodycompositionanalysisneuralnetworkversusasemiautomaticreferenceprogramwithhumancorrectioninpatientswithlungcancer
AT fantuzzigiamila validationofskeletalmuscleandadiposetissuemeasurementsusingafullyautomatedbodycompositionanalysisneuralnetworkversusasemiautomaticreferenceprogramwithhumancorrectioninpatientswithlungcancer
AT geeseythomas validationofskeletalmuscleandadiposetissuemeasurementsusingafullyautomatedbodycompositionanalysisneuralnetworkversusasemiautomaticreferenceprogramwithhumancorrectioninpatientswithlungcancer
AT shahpalmi validationofskeletalmuscleandadiposetissuemeasurementsusingafullyautomatedbodycompositionanalysisneuralnetworkversusasemiautomaticreferenceprogramwithhumancorrectioninpatientswithlungcancer
AT gomezsandral validationofskeletalmuscleandadiposetissuemeasurementsusingafullyautomatedbodycompositionanalysisneuralnetworkversusasemiautomaticreferenceprogramwithhumancorrectioninpatientswithlungcancer