Cargando…

Genomic investigation refutes record of most diverged avian hybrid

The most diverged avian hybrid that has been documented (Numida meleagris × Penelope superciliaris) was reported in 1957. This identification has yet to be confirmed, and like most contemporary studies of hybridization, the identification was based on phenotype, which can be misleading. In this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alfieri, James M., Johnson, Taryn, Linderholm, Anna, Blackmon, Heath, Athrey, Giridhar N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9689
_version_ 1784864704152207360
author Alfieri, James M.
Johnson, Taryn
Linderholm, Anna
Blackmon, Heath
Athrey, Giridhar N.
author_facet Alfieri, James M.
Johnson, Taryn
Linderholm, Anna
Blackmon, Heath
Athrey, Giridhar N.
author_sort Alfieri, James M.
collection PubMed
description The most diverged avian hybrid that has been documented (Numida meleagris × Penelope superciliaris) was reported in 1957. This identification has yet to be confirmed, and like most contemporary studies of hybridization, the identification was based on phenotype, which can be misleading. In this study, we sequenced the specimen in question and performed analyses to validate the specimen's parentage. We extracted DNA from the specimen in a dedicated ancient DNA facility and performed whole‐genome short‐read sequencing. We used BLAST to find Galliformes sequences similar to the hybrid specimen reads. We found that the proportion of BLAST hits mapped overwhelmingly to two species, N. meleagris and Gallus gallus. Additionally, we constructed phylogenies using avian orthologs and parsed the species placed as sister to the hybrid. Again, the hybrid specimen was placed as a sister to N. meleagris and G. gallus. Despite not being a hybrid between N. meleagris and P. superciliaris, the hybrid still represents the most diverged avian hybrid confirmed with genetic data. In addition to correcting the “record” of the most diverged avian hybrid, these findings support recent assertions that morphological and behavioral‐based identifications of avian hybrids can be error‐prone. Consequently, this study serves as a cautionary tale to researchers of hybridization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9817184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98171842023-01-06 Genomic investigation refutes record of most diverged avian hybrid Alfieri, James M. Johnson, Taryn Linderholm, Anna Blackmon, Heath Athrey, Giridhar N. Ecol Evol Nature Notes The most diverged avian hybrid that has been documented (Numida meleagris × Penelope superciliaris) was reported in 1957. This identification has yet to be confirmed, and like most contemporary studies of hybridization, the identification was based on phenotype, which can be misleading. In this study, we sequenced the specimen in question and performed analyses to validate the specimen's parentage. We extracted DNA from the specimen in a dedicated ancient DNA facility and performed whole‐genome short‐read sequencing. We used BLAST to find Galliformes sequences similar to the hybrid specimen reads. We found that the proportion of BLAST hits mapped overwhelmingly to two species, N. meleagris and Gallus gallus. Additionally, we constructed phylogenies using avian orthologs and parsed the species placed as sister to the hybrid. Again, the hybrid specimen was placed as a sister to N. meleagris and G. gallus. Despite not being a hybrid between N. meleagris and P. superciliaris, the hybrid still represents the most diverged avian hybrid confirmed with genetic data. In addition to correcting the “record” of the most diverged avian hybrid, these findings support recent assertions that morphological and behavioral‐based identifications of avian hybrids can be error‐prone. Consequently, this study serves as a cautionary tale to researchers of hybridization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9817184/ /pubmed/36620416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9689 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nature Notes
Alfieri, James M.
Johnson, Taryn
Linderholm, Anna
Blackmon, Heath
Athrey, Giridhar N.
Genomic investigation refutes record of most diverged avian hybrid
title Genomic investigation refutes record of most diverged avian hybrid
title_full Genomic investigation refutes record of most diverged avian hybrid
title_fullStr Genomic investigation refutes record of most diverged avian hybrid
title_full_unstemmed Genomic investigation refutes record of most diverged avian hybrid
title_short Genomic investigation refutes record of most diverged avian hybrid
title_sort genomic investigation refutes record of most diverged avian hybrid
topic Nature Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9689
work_keys_str_mv AT alfierijamesm genomicinvestigationrefutesrecordofmostdivergedavianhybrid
AT johnsontaryn genomicinvestigationrefutesrecordofmostdivergedavianhybrid
AT linderholmanna genomicinvestigationrefutesrecordofmostdivergedavianhybrid
AT blackmonheath genomicinvestigationrefutesrecordofmostdivergedavianhybrid
AT athreygiridharn genomicinvestigationrefutesrecordofmostdivergedavianhybrid