Cargando…

Evaluation of the Australian first few X household transmission project for COVID-19

BACKGROUND: The Australian First Few X (FFX) Household Transmission Project for COVID-19 was the first prospective, multi-jurisdictional study of its kind in Australia. The project was undertaken as a partnership between federal and state health departments and the Australian Partnership for Prepare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcato, Adrian J., Smith, Miranda Z., Fielding, James E., Massey, Peter D., McVernon, Jodie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-14979-3
_version_ 1784864711882309632
author Marcato, Adrian J.
Smith, Miranda Z.
Fielding, James E.
Massey, Peter D.
McVernon, Jodie
author_facet Marcato, Adrian J.
Smith, Miranda Z.
Fielding, James E.
Massey, Peter D.
McVernon, Jodie
author_sort Marcato, Adrian J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Australian First Few X (FFX) Household Transmission Project for COVID-19 was the first prospective, multi-jurisdictional study of its kind in Australia. The project was undertaken as a partnership between federal and state health departments and the Australian Partnership for Preparedness Research on Infectious Disease Emergencies (APPRISE) and was active from April to October 2020. METHODS: We aimed to identify and explore the challenges and strengths of the Australian FFX Project to inform future FFX study development and integration into pandemic preparedness plans. We asked key stakeholders and partners involved with implementation to identify and rank factors relating to the strengths and challenges of project implementation in two rounds of modified Delphi surveys. Key representatives from jurisdictional health departments were then interviewed to contextualise findings within public health processes and information needs to develop a final set of recommendations for FFX study development in Australia. RESULTS: Four clear recommendations emerged from the evaluation. Future preparedness planning should aim to formalise and embed partnerships between health departments and researchers to help better integrate project data collection into core public health surveillance activities. The development of functional, adaptable protocols with pre-established ethics and governance approvals and investment in national data infrastructure were additional priority areas noted by evaluation participants. CONCLUSION: The evaluation provided a great opportunity to consolidate lessons learnt from the Australian FFX Household Transmission Project. The developed recommendations should be incorporated into future pandemic preparedness plans in Australia to enable effective implementation and increase local utility and value of the FFX platform within emergency public health response. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-14979-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9817235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98172352023-01-06 Evaluation of the Australian first few X household transmission project for COVID-19 Marcato, Adrian J. Smith, Miranda Z. Fielding, James E. Massey, Peter D. McVernon, Jodie BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: The Australian First Few X (FFX) Household Transmission Project for COVID-19 was the first prospective, multi-jurisdictional study of its kind in Australia. The project was undertaken as a partnership between federal and state health departments and the Australian Partnership for Preparedness Research on Infectious Disease Emergencies (APPRISE) and was active from April to October 2020. METHODS: We aimed to identify and explore the challenges and strengths of the Australian FFX Project to inform future FFX study development and integration into pandemic preparedness plans. We asked key stakeholders and partners involved with implementation to identify and rank factors relating to the strengths and challenges of project implementation in two rounds of modified Delphi surveys. Key representatives from jurisdictional health departments were then interviewed to contextualise findings within public health processes and information needs to develop a final set of recommendations for FFX study development in Australia. RESULTS: Four clear recommendations emerged from the evaluation. Future preparedness planning should aim to formalise and embed partnerships between health departments and researchers to help better integrate project data collection into core public health surveillance activities. The development of functional, adaptable protocols with pre-established ethics and governance approvals and investment in national data infrastructure were additional priority areas noted by evaluation participants. CONCLUSION: The evaluation provided a great opportunity to consolidate lessons learnt from the Australian FFX Household Transmission Project. The developed recommendations should be incorporated into future pandemic preparedness plans in Australia to enable effective implementation and increase local utility and value of the FFX platform within emergency public health response. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-14979-3. BioMed Central 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9817235/ /pubmed/36609291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-14979-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Marcato, Adrian J.
Smith, Miranda Z.
Fielding, James E.
Massey, Peter D.
McVernon, Jodie
Evaluation of the Australian first few X household transmission project for COVID-19
title Evaluation of the Australian first few X household transmission project for COVID-19
title_full Evaluation of the Australian first few X household transmission project for COVID-19
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Australian first few X household transmission project for COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Australian first few X household transmission project for COVID-19
title_short Evaluation of the Australian first few X household transmission project for COVID-19
title_sort evaluation of the australian first few x household transmission project for covid-19
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-14979-3
work_keys_str_mv AT marcatoadrianj evaluationoftheaustralianfirstfewxhouseholdtransmissionprojectforcovid19
AT smithmirandaz evaluationoftheaustralianfirstfewxhouseholdtransmissionprojectforcovid19
AT fieldingjamese evaluationoftheaustralianfirstfewxhouseholdtransmissionprojectforcovid19
AT masseypeterd evaluationoftheaustralianfirstfewxhouseholdtransmissionprojectforcovid19
AT mcvernonjodie evaluationoftheaustralianfirstfewxhouseholdtransmissionprojectforcovid19