Cargando…
Comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome
BACKGROUND: Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS). The purpose of this study was to compare the results of metaphyseal and diaphyseal USO. METHODS: This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes and complications...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06070-6 |
_version_ | 1784864729713344512 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Haoyu Qi, Weiya Zhang, Fei Zhang, Qian Liu, Yuzhou Lu, Zhengfeng Mi, Jingyi Zhao, Gang |
author_facet | Yang, Haoyu Qi, Weiya Zhang, Fei Zhang, Qian Liu, Yuzhou Lu, Zhengfeng Mi, Jingyi Zhao, Gang |
author_sort | Yang, Haoyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS). The purpose of this study was to compare the results of metaphyseal and diaphyseal USO. METHODS: This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes and complications of 32 patients who underwent diaphyseal step-cut USO (n = 10), diaphyseal oblique USO (n = 12), or metaphyseal USO (n = 10). RESULTS: Patient characteristics, ulnar variance, wrist range of motion, preoperative pain, grip strength, and functional scores (quick disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand and patient-rated wrist evaluation) were comparable. Both operation time (79.5 vs. 138/139 min) and incision length (7.80 vs. 9.67/13.00 cm) were shorter in the metaphyseal USO than in the diaphyseal oblique/step-cut USO. Compared with diaphyseal oblique/step-cut USO, metaphyseal osteotomies were associated with greater improvement in the pain on postoperative day 3 and shorter bone healing time. The requirements for implant removal were the same among the three groups. No complications were observed in any group. CONCLUSION: Compared with diaphyseal USO, metaphyseal USO has advantages for operation time and incision length, early postoperative pain, bone healing in UIS management. The results suggested that metaphyseal USO could be widely applied to the surgical treatment of UIS. However, the long-term outcomes of these techniques still require further evaluation using more large-scale, randomized clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9817322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98173222023-01-07 Comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome Yang, Haoyu Qi, Weiya Zhang, Fei Zhang, Qian Liu, Yuzhou Lu, Zhengfeng Mi, Jingyi Zhao, Gang BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS). The purpose of this study was to compare the results of metaphyseal and diaphyseal USO. METHODS: This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes and complications of 32 patients who underwent diaphyseal step-cut USO (n = 10), diaphyseal oblique USO (n = 12), or metaphyseal USO (n = 10). RESULTS: Patient characteristics, ulnar variance, wrist range of motion, preoperative pain, grip strength, and functional scores (quick disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand and patient-rated wrist evaluation) were comparable. Both operation time (79.5 vs. 138/139 min) and incision length (7.80 vs. 9.67/13.00 cm) were shorter in the metaphyseal USO than in the diaphyseal oblique/step-cut USO. Compared with diaphyseal oblique/step-cut USO, metaphyseal osteotomies were associated with greater improvement in the pain on postoperative day 3 and shorter bone healing time. The requirements for implant removal were the same among the three groups. No complications were observed in any group. CONCLUSION: Compared with diaphyseal USO, metaphyseal USO has advantages for operation time and incision length, early postoperative pain, bone healing in UIS management. The results suggested that metaphyseal USO could be widely applied to the surgical treatment of UIS. However, the long-term outcomes of these techniques still require further evaluation using more large-scale, randomized clinical trials. BioMed Central 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9817322/ /pubmed/36609310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06070-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Yang, Haoyu Qi, Weiya Zhang, Fei Zhang, Qian Liu, Yuzhou Lu, Zhengfeng Mi, Jingyi Zhao, Gang Comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome |
title | Comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome |
title_full | Comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome |
title_fullStr | Comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome |
title_short | Comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome |
title_sort | comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06070-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanghaoyu comparisonofdiaphysealandmetaphysealulnarshorteningosteotomiesforthetreatmentofulnarimpactionsyndrome AT qiweiya comparisonofdiaphysealandmetaphysealulnarshorteningosteotomiesforthetreatmentofulnarimpactionsyndrome AT zhangfei comparisonofdiaphysealandmetaphysealulnarshorteningosteotomiesforthetreatmentofulnarimpactionsyndrome AT zhangqian comparisonofdiaphysealandmetaphysealulnarshorteningosteotomiesforthetreatmentofulnarimpactionsyndrome AT liuyuzhou comparisonofdiaphysealandmetaphysealulnarshorteningosteotomiesforthetreatmentofulnarimpactionsyndrome AT luzhengfeng comparisonofdiaphysealandmetaphysealulnarshorteningosteotomiesforthetreatmentofulnarimpactionsyndrome AT mijingyi comparisonofdiaphysealandmetaphysealulnarshorteningosteotomiesforthetreatmentofulnarimpactionsyndrome AT zhaogang comparisonofdiaphysealandmetaphysealulnarshorteningosteotomiesforthetreatmentofulnarimpactionsyndrome |