Cargando…

Blinatumomab in Relapsed/Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: 20–40% of patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) have relapsing or refractory (r/r) disease, and standard treatment for such patients is poorly established. An unexplored treatment option is the bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab, as used for the treatment of r/r and minimal residua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bohler, Jeanne, Bacher, Ulrike, Banz, Yara, Stadelmann, Raphael, Medinger, Michael, Zander, Thilo, Pabst, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010044
_version_ 1784864868974723072
author Bohler, Jeanne
Bacher, Ulrike
Banz, Yara
Stadelmann, Raphael
Medinger, Michael
Zander, Thilo
Pabst, Thomas
author_facet Bohler, Jeanne
Bacher, Ulrike
Banz, Yara
Stadelmann, Raphael
Medinger, Michael
Zander, Thilo
Pabst, Thomas
author_sort Bohler, Jeanne
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: 20–40% of patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) have relapsing or refractory (r/r) disease, and standard treatment for such patients is poorly established. An unexplored treatment option is the bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab, as used for the treatment of r/r and minimal residual disease (MRD) positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). So far, data on the use of blinatumomab in r/r BL are limited. In this retrospective multi-center case series, we investigated blinatumomab treatment in nine patients with r/r BL after 1–3 previous therapy lines. Data on safety and efficacy were collected. No high-grade (≥grade 3) adverse effects (AEs) occurred, and use of blinatumomab was found to be safe. The best response to blinatumomab and survival data varied considerably among patients, but with five from nine patients responding, blinatumomab seems to have activity in patients with r/r BL. Our data suggest that blinatumomab could be further explored in r/r BL. ABSTRACT: In patients with relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma (r/r BL), overall survival (OS) is poor, and effective therapies and evidence for the best therapy are lacking. The monoclonal antibody blinatumomab may represent a novel option. However, only limited data on the use of blinatumomab in r/r BL are so far available. This multi-center, retrospective case series investigated nine patients with r/r BL treated with blinatumomab. The safety of blinatumomab was assessed with respect to frequency and severity of adverse effects (AEs) infections, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS), OS and overall response rate (ORR) were analyzed to assess efficacy. No AEs > grade 2 occurred, and AEs were generally treatable and fully reversible. The best response to blinatumomab was complete remission in 3/9 patients and partial remission in 2/9, whilst 4/9 presented with progressive disease. Median PFS and OS were 2 and 6 months, respectively, ranging from 5 days to 32 months and 11 days to 32 months, respectively. Blinatumomab treatment was a successful bridging treatment to stem cell transplantation in 3/9 patients. The response to blinatumomab varied widely, and only one patient survived longer term, but activity in patients with r/r BL was evident in some patients, with its use being safe, warranting its prospective investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9817963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98179632023-01-07 Blinatumomab in Relapsed/Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma Bohler, Jeanne Bacher, Ulrike Banz, Yara Stadelmann, Raphael Medinger, Michael Zander, Thilo Pabst, Thomas Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: 20–40% of patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) have relapsing or refractory (r/r) disease, and standard treatment for such patients is poorly established. An unexplored treatment option is the bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab, as used for the treatment of r/r and minimal residual disease (MRD) positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). So far, data on the use of blinatumomab in r/r BL are limited. In this retrospective multi-center case series, we investigated blinatumomab treatment in nine patients with r/r BL after 1–3 previous therapy lines. Data on safety and efficacy were collected. No high-grade (≥grade 3) adverse effects (AEs) occurred, and use of blinatumomab was found to be safe. The best response to blinatumomab and survival data varied considerably among patients, but with five from nine patients responding, blinatumomab seems to have activity in patients with r/r BL. Our data suggest that blinatumomab could be further explored in r/r BL. ABSTRACT: In patients with relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma (r/r BL), overall survival (OS) is poor, and effective therapies and evidence for the best therapy are lacking. The monoclonal antibody blinatumomab may represent a novel option. However, only limited data on the use of blinatumomab in r/r BL are so far available. This multi-center, retrospective case series investigated nine patients with r/r BL treated with blinatumomab. The safety of blinatumomab was assessed with respect to frequency and severity of adverse effects (AEs) infections, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS), OS and overall response rate (ORR) were analyzed to assess efficacy. No AEs > grade 2 occurred, and AEs were generally treatable and fully reversible. The best response to blinatumomab was complete remission in 3/9 patients and partial remission in 2/9, whilst 4/9 presented with progressive disease. Median PFS and OS were 2 and 6 months, respectively, ranging from 5 days to 32 months and 11 days to 32 months, respectively. Blinatumomab treatment was a successful bridging treatment to stem cell transplantation in 3/9 patients. The response to blinatumomab varied widely, and only one patient survived longer term, but activity in patients with r/r BL was evident in some patients, with its use being safe, warranting its prospective investigation. MDPI 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9817963/ /pubmed/36612039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010044 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bohler, Jeanne
Bacher, Ulrike
Banz, Yara
Stadelmann, Raphael
Medinger, Michael
Zander, Thilo
Pabst, Thomas
Blinatumomab in Relapsed/Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma
title Blinatumomab in Relapsed/Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma
title_full Blinatumomab in Relapsed/Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma
title_fullStr Blinatumomab in Relapsed/Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Blinatumomab in Relapsed/Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma
title_short Blinatumomab in Relapsed/Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma
title_sort blinatumomab in relapsed/refractory burkitt lymphoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010044
work_keys_str_mv AT bohlerjeanne blinatumomabinrelapsedrefractoryburkittlymphoma
AT bacherulrike blinatumomabinrelapsedrefractoryburkittlymphoma
AT banzyara blinatumomabinrelapsedrefractoryburkittlymphoma
AT stadelmannraphael blinatumomabinrelapsedrefractoryburkittlymphoma
AT medingermichael blinatumomabinrelapsedrefractoryburkittlymphoma
AT zanderthilo blinatumomabinrelapsedrefractoryburkittlymphoma
AT pabstthomas blinatumomabinrelapsedrefractoryburkittlymphoma