Cargando…

Differences in Tumor Growth and Differentiation in NSG and Humanized-BLT Mice; Analysis of Human vs. Humanized-BLT-Derived NK Expansion and Functions

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Cancer biologists have used NSG mice for many years as preclinical model to study the biology and the success of therapeutic modalities for cancer. Although these mice are easy to use for the implantation of tumors, they do not fully represent the human disease, since they do not hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Kawaljit, Jewett, Anahid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010112
_version_ 1784864871485014016
author Kaur, Kawaljit
Jewett, Anahid
author_facet Kaur, Kawaljit
Jewett, Anahid
author_sort Kaur, Kawaljit
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Cancer biologists have used NSG mice for many years as preclinical model to study the biology and the success of therapeutic modalities for cancer. Although these mice are easy to use for the implantation of tumors, they do not fully represent the human disease, since they do not have the key immune effectors that control the growth and expansion of tumors. In contrast, humanized-BLT mice have these key immune effectors, and they resemble humans in their immune cells, with some differences. We compared the growth, expansion, and infiltration of immune cells in tumors and their function in tumors implanted in these two types of mice. We also studied the immune cells from humanized-BLT mice and compared these to human immune cells. Our studies show that humanized-BLT mice is an appropriate model to study human cancer, especially for studies of Natural Killer cells. ABSTRACT: There is significant interest and debate regarding the best mouse model of human disease, since studies in wild-type mice may not always recapitulate human diseases. The NSG mouse model has been one of the most commonly used mouse models to study cancer; however, this mouse model, even though it has several advantages in regard to the ease of tumor implantation and financial feasibility, does not represent human disease due to the immunodeficient nature of this model. In this study, we performed oral and pancreatic tumor studies in NSG and hu-BLT mice and found several distinguishing features that make hu-BLT model more suitable for studying human cancer. In addition, we compared the immune function of humans to hu-BLT mice to understand the differences and similarities of the models. Oral and pancreatic cancer stem cells were implanted in NSG and hu-BLT mice. Both tumors grew robustly in NSG mice and killed them within a short period of time. On the contrary, unlike NSG mice, tumor-bearing hu-BLT mice survived longer, grew smaller tumors, and the grown tumors exhibited lower rates of expansion, with a higher surface expression of MHC-class I and lower NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity that was previously shown to have more of a differentiated phenotype. Although the peripheral blood of hu-BLT mice in comparison to that of humans had lower percentages of NK cells and cytotoxic function, it mediated a higher secretion of IFN-γ, likely contributing to the differentiation of the tumor cells and subsequent decrease in the tumor size in the hu-BLT mice in comparison to the NSG mice. Spleen-derived hu-BLT mouse NK cells were able to expand in the presence of autologous osteoclasts and substantially increase both cytotoxicity and secretion of IFN-γ, similar to those seen in peripheral blood-derived human NK cells, indicating that NK cells from hu-BLT mice are capable of expansion and functional activation when activating signals are given. Thus, the many similarities between human and hu-BLT mouse immune systems make this mouse model more appropriate to study human cancer. In particular, it is well-suited for studies of allogeneic NK cell-based immunotherapy in cancer treatment. The advantages and challenges of hu-BLT mice in cancer studies are also discussed in this report.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9817973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98179732023-01-07 Differences in Tumor Growth and Differentiation in NSG and Humanized-BLT Mice; Analysis of Human vs. Humanized-BLT-Derived NK Expansion and Functions Kaur, Kawaljit Jewett, Anahid Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Cancer biologists have used NSG mice for many years as preclinical model to study the biology and the success of therapeutic modalities for cancer. Although these mice are easy to use for the implantation of tumors, they do not fully represent the human disease, since they do not have the key immune effectors that control the growth and expansion of tumors. In contrast, humanized-BLT mice have these key immune effectors, and they resemble humans in their immune cells, with some differences. We compared the growth, expansion, and infiltration of immune cells in tumors and their function in tumors implanted in these two types of mice. We also studied the immune cells from humanized-BLT mice and compared these to human immune cells. Our studies show that humanized-BLT mice is an appropriate model to study human cancer, especially for studies of Natural Killer cells. ABSTRACT: There is significant interest and debate regarding the best mouse model of human disease, since studies in wild-type mice may not always recapitulate human diseases. The NSG mouse model has been one of the most commonly used mouse models to study cancer; however, this mouse model, even though it has several advantages in regard to the ease of tumor implantation and financial feasibility, does not represent human disease due to the immunodeficient nature of this model. In this study, we performed oral and pancreatic tumor studies in NSG and hu-BLT mice and found several distinguishing features that make hu-BLT model more suitable for studying human cancer. In addition, we compared the immune function of humans to hu-BLT mice to understand the differences and similarities of the models. Oral and pancreatic cancer stem cells were implanted in NSG and hu-BLT mice. Both tumors grew robustly in NSG mice and killed them within a short period of time. On the contrary, unlike NSG mice, tumor-bearing hu-BLT mice survived longer, grew smaller tumors, and the grown tumors exhibited lower rates of expansion, with a higher surface expression of MHC-class I and lower NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity that was previously shown to have more of a differentiated phenotype. Although the peripheral blood of hu-BLT mice in comparison to that of humans had lower percentages of NK cells and cytotoxic function, it mediated a higher secretion of IFN-γ, likely contributing to the differentiation of the tumor cells and subsequent decrease in the tumor size in the hu-BLT mice in comparison to the NSG mice. Spleen-derived hu-BLT mouse NK cells were able to expand in the presence of autologous osteoclasts and substantially increase both cytotoxicity and secretion of IFN-γ, similar to those seen in peripheral blood-derived human NK cells, indicating that NK cells from hu-BLT mice are capable of expansion and functional activation when activating signals are given. Thus, the many similarities between human and hu-BLT mouse immune systems make this mouse model more appropriate to study human cancer. In particular, it is well-suited for studies of allogeneic NK cell-based immunotherapy in cancer treatment. The advantages and challenges of hu-BLT mice in cancer studies are also discussed in this report. MDPI 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9817973/ /pubmed/36612108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010112 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kaur, Kawaljit
Jewett, Anahid
Differences in Tumor Growth and Differentiation in NSG and Humanized-BLT Mice; Analysis of Human vs. Humanized-BLT-Derived NK Expansion and Functions
title Differences in Tumor Growth and Differentiation in NSG and Humanized-BLT Mice; Analysis of Human vs. Humanized-BLT-Derived NK Expansion and Functions
title_full Differences in Tumor Growth and Differentiation in NSG and Humanized-BLT Mice; Analysis of Human vs. Humanized-BLT-Derived NK Expansion and Functions
title_fullStr Differences in Tumor Growth and Differentiation in NSG and Humanized-BLT Mice; Analysis of Human vs. Humanized-BLT-Derived NK Expansion and Functions
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Tumor Growth and Differentiation in NSG and Humanized-BLT Mice; Analysis of Human vs. Humanized-BLT-Derived NK Expansion and Functions
title_short Differences in Tumor Growth and Differentiation in NSG and Humanized-BLT Mice; Analysis of Human vs. Humanized-BLT-Derived NK Expansion and Functions
title_sort differences in tumor growth and differentiation in nsg and humanized-blt mice; analysis of human vs. humanized-blt-derived nk expansion and functions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010112
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurkawaljit differencesintumorgrowthanddifferentiationinnsgandhumanizedbltmiceanalysisofhumanvshumanizedbltderivednkexpansionandfunctions
AT jewettanahid differencesintumorgrowthanddifferentiationinnsgandhumanizedbltmiceanalysisofhumanvshumanizedbltderivednkexpansionandfunctions