Cargando…

BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, one of the reference therapies for the treatment of mutated BRAF metastatic melanoma is based on the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Although many trials have compared BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapies, there is no evidence of superiority in the use of one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garutti, Mattia, Bergnach, Melissa, Polesel, Jerry, Palmero, Lorenza, Pizzichetta, Maria Antonietta, Puglisi, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010141
_version_ 1784864883506937856
author Garutti, Mattia
Bergnach, Melissa
Polesel, Jerry
Palmero, Lorenza
Pizzichetta, Maria Antonietta
Puglisi, Fabio
author_facet Garutti, Mattia
Bergnach, Melissa
Polesel, Jerry
Palmero, Lorenza
Pizzichetta, Maria Antonietta
Puglisi, Fabio
author_sort Garutti, Mattia
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, one of the reference therapies for the treatment of mutated BRAF metastatic melanoma is based on the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Although many trials have compared BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapies, there is no evidence of superiority in the use of one of the three combinations over the others. Furthermore, comparative data on safety are scarce. To help clinicians tailor patients’ treatment using the most appropriate BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations, we performed a meta-analysis of adverse events associated with each treatment combination. ABSTRACT: Purpose: This meta-analysis summarizes the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) of BRAFi and MEKi. Methods: A systematic search of Medline/PubMed was conducted to identify suitable articles published in English up to 31 December 2021. The primary outcomes were profiles for all-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs, and the analysis of single side effects belonging to both categories. Results: The overall incidence of treatment-related all-grade Aes was 99% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.97–1.00) and 97% for Trametinib (95% CI: 0.92–0.99; I(2) = 66%) and Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.94–0.99; I(2) = 0%). In combined therapies, the rate was 98% for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.96–0.99; I(2) = 77%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.96–1.00). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 69% of cases for Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.50–0.84; I(2) = 71%), 68% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.61–0.74), and 72% for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.65–0.79; I(2) = 84%). The most common grade 1–2 AEs were pyrexia (43%) and fatigue (28%) for Dabrafenib + Trametinib and diarrhea for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (52%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (34%). The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were pyrexia, rash, and hypertension for Dabrafenib + Trametinib (6%), rash and hypertension for Encorafenib + Binimetinib (6%), and increased AST and ALT for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (10%). Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive data on treatment-related adverse events of BRAFi and MEKi combination therapies, showing related toxicity profiles to offer a helpful tool for clinicians in the choice of therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9818023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98180232023-01-07 BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis Garutti, Mattia Bergnach, Melissa Polesel, Jerry Palmero, Lorenza Pizzichetta, Maria Antonietta Puglisi, Fabio Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, one of the reference therapies for the treatment of mutated BRAF metastatic melanoma is based on the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Although many trials have compared BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapies, there is no evidence of superiority in the use of one of the three combinations over the others. Furthermore, comparative data on safety are scarce. To help clinicians tailor patients’ treatment using the most appropriate BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations, we performed a meta-analysis of adverse events associated with each treatment combination. ABSTRACT: Purpose: This meta-analysis summarizes the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) of BRAFi and MEKi. Methods: A systematic search of Medline/PubMed was conducted to identify suitable articles published in English up to 31 December 2021. The primary outcomes were profiles for all-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs, and the analysis of single side effects belonging to both categories. Results: The overall incidence of treatment-related all-grade Aes was 99% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.97–1.00) and 97% for Trametinib (95% CI: 0.92–0.99; I(2) = 66%) and Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.94–0.99; I(2) = 0%). In combined therapies, the rate was 98% for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.96–0.99; I(2) = 77%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.96–1.00). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 69% of cases for Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.50–0.84; I(2) = 71%), 68% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.61–0.74), and 72% for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.65–0.79; I(2) = 84%). The most common grade 1–2 AEs were pyrexia (43%) and fatigue (28%) for Dabrafenib + Trametinib and diarrhea for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (52%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (34%). The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were pyrexia, rash, and hypertension for Dabrafenib + Trametinib (6%), rash and hypertension for Encorafenib + Binimetinib (6%), and increased AST and ALT for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (10%). Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive data on treatment-related adverse events of BRAFi and MEKi combination therapies, showing related toxicity profiles to offer a helpful tool for clinicians in the choice of therapy. MDPI 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9818023/ /pubmed/36612138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010141 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Garutti, Mattia
Bergnach, Melissa
Polesel, Jerry
Palmero, Lorenza
Pizzichetta, Maria Antonietta
Puglisi, Fabio
BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis
title BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis
title_full BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis
title_short BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort braf and mek inhibitors and their toxicities: a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010141
work_keys_str_mv AT garuttimattia brafandmekinhibitorsandtheirtoxicitiesametaanalysis
AT bergnachmelissa brafandmekinhibitorsandtheirtoxicitiesametaanalysis
AT poleseljerry brafandmekinhibitorsandtheirtoxicitiesametaanalysis
AT palmerolorenza brafandmekinhibitorsandtheirtoxicitiesametaanalysis
AT pizzichettamariaantonietta brafandmekinhibitorsandtheirtoxicitiesametaanalysis
AT puglisifabio brafandmekinhibitorsandtheirtoxicitiesametaanalysis