Cargando…
The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Several studies have demonstrated the value of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in breast cancer diagnosis. The systematic review of AI applications in breast cancer diagnosis includes several studies that compare breast cancer diagnosis and AI. However, they lack systematization, and each...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36611337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010045 |
_version_ | 1784865092847796224 |
---|---|
author | Uzun Ozsahin, Dilber Ikechukwu Emegano, Declan Uzun, Berna Ozsahin, Ilker |
author_facet | Uzun Ozsahin, Dilber Ikechukwu Emegano, Declan Uzun, Berna Ozsahin, Ilker |
author_sort | Uzun Ozsahin, Dilber |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several studies have demonstrated the value of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in breast cancer diagnosis. The systematic review of AI applications in breast cancer diagnosis includes several studies that compare breast cancer diagnosis and AI. However, they lack systematization, and each study appears to be conducted uniquely. The purpose and contributions of this study are to offer elaborative knowledge on the applications of AI in the diagnosis of breast cancer through citation analysis in order to categorize the main area of specialization that attracts the attention of the academic community, as well as thematic issue analysis to identify the species being researched in each category. In this study, a total number of 17,900 studies addressing breast cancer and AI published between 2012 and 2022 were obtained from these databases: IEEE, Embase: Excerpta Medica Database Guide-Ovid, PubMed, Springer, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We applied inclusion and exclusion criteria to the search; 36 studies were identified. The vast majority of AI applications used classification models for the prediction of breast cancer. Howbeit, accuracy (99%) has the highest number of performance metrics, followed by specificity (98%) and area under the curve (0.95). Additionally, the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was the best model of choice in several studies. This study shows that the quantity and caliber of studies that use AI applications in breast cancer diagnosis will continue to rise annually. As a result, AI-based applications are viewed as a supplement to doctors’ clinical reasoning, with the ultimate goal of providing quality healthcare that is both affordable and accessible to everyone worldwide. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9818874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98188742023-01-07 The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis Uzun Ozsahin, Dilber Ikechukwu Emegano, Declan Uzun, Berna Ozsahin, Ilker Diagnostics (Basel) Review Several studies have demonstrated the value of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in breast cancer diagnosis. The systematic review of AI applications in breast cancer diagnosis includes several studies that compare breast cancer diagnosis and AI. However, they lack systematization, and each study appears to be conducted uniquely. The purpose and contributions of this study are to offer elaborative knowledge on the applications of AI in the diagnosis of breast cancer through citation analysis in order to categorize the main area of specialization that attracts the attention of the academic community, as well as thematic issue analysis to identify the species being researched in each category. In this study, a total number of 17,900 studies addressing breast cancer and AI published between 2012 and 2022 were obtained from these databases: IEEE, Embase: Excerpta Medica Database Guide-Ovid, PubMed, Springer, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We applied inclusion and exclusion criteria to the search; 36 studies were identified. The vast majority of AI applications used classification models for the prediction of breast cancer. Howbeit, accuracy (99%) has the highest number of performance metrics, followed by specificity (98%) and area under the curve (0.95). Additionally, the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was the best model of choice in several studies. This study shows that the quantity and caliber of studies that use AI applications in breast cancer diagnosis will continue to rise annually. As a result, AI-based applications are viewed as a supplement to doctors’ clinical reasoning, with the ultimate goal of providing quality healthcare that is both affordable and accessible to everyone worldwide. MDPI 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9818874/ /pubmed/36611337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010045 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Uzun Ozsahin, Dilber Ikechukwu Emegano, Declan Uzun, Berna Ozsahin, Ilker The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
title | The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
title_full | The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
title_fullStr | The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
title_short | The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis |
title_sort | systematic review of artificial intelligence applications in breast cancer diagnosis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36611337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uzunozsahindilber thesystematicreviewofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinbreastcancerdiagnosis AT ikechukwuemeganodeclan thesystematicreviewofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinbreastcancerdiagnosis AT uzunberna thesystematicreviewofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinbreastcancerdiagnosis AT ozsahinilker thesystematicreviewofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinbreastcancerdiagnosis AT uzunozsahindilber systematicreviewofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinbreastcancerdiagnosis AT ikechukwuemeganodeclan systematicreviewofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinbreastcancerdiagnosis AT uzunberna systematicreviewofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinbreastcancerdiagnosis AT ozsahinilker systematicreviewofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinbreastcancerdiagnosis |