Cargando…
Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests
The Xpert(®) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 and Xpert(®) Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV tests were rapidly developed and widely used during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. In response to emerging genetic variability, a new SARS-CoV-2 target (RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase) has...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36611325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010034 |
_version_ | 1784865099154980864 |
---|---|
author | Noble, Lara Dominique Scott, Lesley Erica Munir, Riffat Du Plessis, Mignon Steegen, Kim Hans, Lucia Marokane, Puleng Da Silva, Pedro Stevens, Wendy Susan |
author_facet | Noble, Lara Dominique Scott, Lesley Erica Munir, Riffat Du Plessis, Mignon Steegen, Kim Hans, Lucia Marokane, Puleng Da Silva, Pedro Stevens, Wendy Susan |
author_sort | Noble, Lara Dominique |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Xpert(®) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 and Xpert(®) Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV tests were rapidly developed and widely used during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. In response to emerging genetic variability, a new SARS-CoV-2 target (RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase) has been added to both tests: Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test. A rapid evaluation of both tests was performed in South Africa, using residual respiratory specimens. Residual respiratory specimens (n = 125) were used to evaluate the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus test and included 50 genotyped specimens. The Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test was assessed using 45 genotyped SARS-CoV-2 specimens, 10 influenza A, 10 influenza B and 20 respiratory syncytial virus specimens. Results were compared to in-country standard-of-care tests. Genotyped specimens tested the performance of the test under pressure from circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Reference material was included to assess the test limits and linearity. The Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus test performance compared to reference results across residual respiratory specimens was good (positive percentage agreement (PPA) = 95.2%, negative percentage agreement (NPA) = 95.0%) The Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test showed good performance across all residual respiratory specimens (PPA = 100%, NPA = 98.3%). All genotyped variants of concern were detected by both tests. The Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus tests can be used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2, and to diagnose and differentiate SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B and respiratory syncytial virus, respectively. The NPA was lower than the recommended 99%, but was influenced by the low number of negative specimens tested. The variants of concern assessed did not affect test performance. It is recommended that sites perform their own assessments compared to in-country standard-of-care tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9818900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98189002023-01-07 Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests Noble, Lara Dominique Scott, Lesley Erica Munir, Riffat Du Plessis, Mignon Steegen, Kim Hans, Lucia Marokane, Puleng Da Silva, Pedro Stevens, Wendy Susan Diagnostics (Basel) Article The Xpert(®) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 and Xpert(®) Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV tests were rapidly developed and widely used during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. In response to emerging genetic variability, a new SARS-CoV-2 target (RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase) has been added to both tests: Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test. A rapid evaluation of both tests was performed in South Africa, using residual respiratory specimens. Residual respiratory specimens (n = 125) were used to evaluate the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus test and included 50 genotyped specimens. The Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test was assessed using 45 genotyped SARS-CoV-2 specimens, 10 influenza A, 10 influenza B and 20 respiratory syncytial virus specimens. Results were compared to in-country standard-of-care tests. Genotyped specimens tested the performance of the test under pressure from circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Reference material was included to assess the test limits and linearity. The Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus test performance compared to reference results across residual respiratory specimens was good (positive percentage agreement (PPA) = 95.2%, negative percentage agreement (NPA) = 95.0%) The Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test showed good performance across all residual respiratory specimens (PPA = 100%, NPA = 98.3%). All genotyped variants of concern were detected by both tests. The Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus tests can be used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2, and to diagnose and differentiate SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B and respiratory syncytial virus, respectively. The NPA was lower than the recommended 99%, but was influenced by the low number of negative specimens tested. The variants of concern assessed did not affect test performance. It is recommended that sites perform their own assessments compared to in-country standard-of-care tests. MDPI 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9818900/ /pubmed/36611325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010034 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Noble, Lara Dominique Scott, Lesley Erica Munir, Riffat Du Plessis, Mignon Steegen, Kim Hans, Lucia Marokane, Puleng Da Silva, Pedro Stevens, Wendy Susan Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests |
title | Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests |
title_full | Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests |
title_fullStr | Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests |
title_short | Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert(®) Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests |
title_sort | rapid evaluation of the xpert(®) xpress cov-2 plus and xpert(®) xpress cov-2/flu/rsv plus tests |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36611325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noblelaradominique rapidevaluationofthexpertxpresscov2plusandxpertxpresscov2flursvplustests AT scottlesleyerica rapidevaluationofthexpertxpresscov2plusandxpertxpresscov2flursvplustests AT munirriffat rapidevaluationofthexpertxpresscov2plusandxpertxpresscov2flursvplustests AT duplessismignon rapidevaluationofthexpertxpresscov2plusandxpertxpresscov2flursvplustests AT steegenkim rapidevaluationofthexpertxpresscov2plusandxpertxpresscov2flursvplustests AT hanslucia rapidevaluationofthexpertxpresscov2plusandxpertxpresscov2flursvplustests AT marokanepuleng rapidevaluationofthexpertxpresscov2plusandxpertxpresscov2flursvplustests AT dasilvapedro rapidevaluationofthexpertxpresscov2plusandxpertxpresscov2flursvplustests AT stevenswendysusan rapidevaluationofthexpertxpresscov2plusandxpertxpresscov2flursvplustests |