Cargando…

Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection

Japanese people experienced the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings, the Japan Nuclear Fuel Conversion Co. criticality accident, it was found that many human resources are needed to respond to residents’ concerns about disaster exposure in the event of a radiation disaster. Medical radiologic tec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yashima, Sachiko, Chida, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9819470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612833
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010497
_version_ 1784865235596738560
author Yashima, Sachiko
Chida, Koichi
author_facet Yashima, Sachiko
Chida, Koichi
author_sort Yashima, Sachiko
collection PubMed
description Japanese people experienced the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings, the Japan Nuclear Fuel Conversion Co. criticality accident, it was found that many human resources are needed to respond to residents’ concerns about disaster exposure in the event of a radiation disaster. Medical radiologic technologists learn about radiation from the time of their training, and are engaged in routine radiographic work, examination explanations, medical exposure counseling, and radiation protection of staff. By learning about nuclear disasters and counseling, we believe they can address residents’ concerns. In order to identify items needed for training, we examined the perceptions of medical radiologic technologists in the case of different specialties, modalities and radiation doses. In 2016, 5 years after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, we conducted a survey of 57 medical radiologic technologists at two medical facilities with different specialties and work contents to investigate their attitudes toward radiation. 42 participants answered questions regarding sex, age group, presence of children, health effects of radiation exposure, radiation control, generation of X rays by diagnostic X ray equipment, and radiation related units. In a comparison of 38 items other than demographic data, 14 showed no significant differences and 24 showed significant differences. This study found that perceptions of radiation were different among radiology technologists at facilities with different specialties. The survey suggested the possibility of identifying needed training items and providing effective training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9819470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98194702023-01-07 Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection Yashima, Sachiko Chida, Koichi Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Japanese people experienced the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings, the Japan Nuclear Fuel Conversion Co. criticality accident, it was found that many human resources are needed to respond to residents’ concerns about disaster exposure in the event of a radiation disaster. Medical radiologic technologists learn about radiation from the time of their training, and are engaged in routine radiographic work, examination explanations, medical exposure counseling, and radiation protection of staff. By learning about nuclear disasters and counseling, we believe they can address residents’ concerns. In order to identify items needed for training, we examined the perceptions of medical radiologic technologists in the case of different specialties, modalities and radiation doses. In 2016, 5 years after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, we conducted a survey of 57 medical radiologic technologists at two medical facilities with different specialties and work contents to investigate their attitudes toward radiation. 42 participants answered questions regarding sex, age group, presence of children, health effects of radiation exposure, radiation control, generation of X rays by diagnostic X ray equipment, and radiation related units. In a comparison of 38 items other than demographic data, 14 showed no significant differences and 24 showed significant differences. This study found that perceptions of radiation were different among radiology technologists at facilities with different specialties. The survey suggested the possibility of identifying needed training items and providing effective training. MDPI 2022-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9819470/ /pubmed/36612833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010497 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yashima, Sachiko
Chida, Koichi
Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection
title Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection
title_full Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection
title_fullStr Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection
title_full_unstemmed Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection
title_short Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection
title_sort awareness of medical radiologic technologists of ionizing radiation and radiation protection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9819470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612833
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010497
work_keys_str_mv AT yashimasachiko awarenessofmedicalradiologictechnologistsofionizingradiationandradiationprotection
AT chidakoichi awarenessofmedicalradiologictechnologistsofionizingradiationandradiationprotection