Cargando…

The Dynamic Evaluation Model of Health Sustainability under MCDM Benchmarking Health Indicator Standards

The coronavirus pandemic causing millions of deaths around the world has raised awareness of the importance of healthcare in a city, especially its efficiency in the city’s system. Although the health dimension is found to have critical effects on sustainable development in addition to the existing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritmak, Nutthawut, Rattanawong, Wanchai, Vongmanee, Varin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9819518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010259
_version_ 1784865247364907008
author Ritmak, Nutthawut
Rattanawong, Wanchai
Vongmanee, Varin
author_facet Ritmak, Nutthawut
Rattanawong, Wanchai
Vongmanee, Varin
author_sort Ritmak, Nutthawut
collection PubMed
description The coronavirus pandemic causing millions of deaths around the world has raised awareness of the importance of healthcare in a city, especially its efficiency in the city’s system. Although the health dimension is found to have critical effects on sustainable development in addition to the existing three dimensions, the majority of sustainability assessments that are developed based on the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) do not define standards for each indicator. On the contrary, an effective assessment model should be dynamic and suitable to the context of each city by referring to standardized criteria, such as those in a health indicator standard (HIS), instead of comparing with other cities. Hence, this research presents a new sustainability assessment model that integrates the health dimension (HEDm) with the other three dimensions generally used in studies of sustainable development (STD) and develops an assessment method to evaluate real data with references to the HIS from reliable organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), for the SDGs. By using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with the framework obtained from literature reviews, ISO Standards (ISO37120, ISO37122, ISO37123) and U4SSC, the researchers formed indicators in four dimensions with a total of 15 elements and 45 indicators. Afterwards, the weight of each indicator was determined with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) conducted in each dimension and element, resulting in a four-dimensional sustainability assessment model based on HIS value that limits the need to compare with other cities. The results from Khon Kaen province have shown the weaknesses and strengths of the target city that policymakers can reference to formulate a policy and strategy to improve HIS values in each dimension to meet standards, elevate city capacity and raise quality of life for the people living in the area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9819518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98195182023-01-07 The Dynamic Evaluation Model of Health Sustainability under MCDM Benchmarking Health Indicator Standards Ritmak, Nutthawut Rattanawong, Wanchai Vongmanee, Varin Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The coronavirus pandemic causing millions of deaths around the world has raised awareness of the importance of healthcare in a city, especially its efficiency in the city’s system. Although the health dimension is found to have critical effects on sustainable development in addition to the existing three dimensions, the majority of sustainability assessments that are developed based on the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) do not define standards for each indicator. On the contrary, an effective assessment model should be dynamic and suitable to the context of each city by referring to standardized criteria, such as those in a health indicator standard (HIS), instead of comparing with other cities. Hence, this research presents a new sustainability assessment model that integrates the health dimension (HEDm) with the other three dimensions generally used in studies of sustainable development (STD) and develops an assessment method to evaluate real data with references to the HIS from reliable organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN), for the SDGs. By using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with the framework obtained from literature reviews, ISO Standards (ISO37120, ISO37122, ISO37123) and U4SSC, the researchers formed indicators in four dimensions with a total of 15 elements and 45 indicators. Afterwards, the weight of each indicator was determined with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) conducted in each dimension and element, resulting in a four-dimensional sustainability assessment model based on HIS value that limits the need to compare with other cities. The results from Khon Kaen province have shown the weaknesses and strengths of the target city that policymakers can reference to formulate a policy and strategy to improve HIS values in each dimension to meet standards, elevate city capacity and raise quality of life for the people living in the area. MDPI 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9819518/ /pubmed/36612581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010259 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ritmak, Nutthawut
Rattanawong, Wanchai
Vongmanee, Varin
The Dynamic Evaluation Model of Health Sustainability under MCDM Benchmarking Health Indicator Standards
title The Dynamic Evaluation Model of Health Sustainability under MCDM Benchmarking Health Indicator Standards
title_full The Dynamic Evaluation Model of Health Sustainability under MCDM Benchmarking Health Indicator Standards
title_fullStr The Dynamic Evaluation Model of Health Sustainability under MCDM Benchmarking Health Indicator Standards
title_full_unstemmed The Dynamic Evaluation Model of Health Sustainability under MCDM Benchmarking Health Indicator Standards
title_short The Dynamic Evaluation Model of Health Sustainability under MCDM Benchmarking Health Indicator Standards
title_sort dynamic evaluation model of health sustainability under mcdm benchmarking health indicator standards
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9819518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010259
work_keys_str_mv AT ritmaknutthawut thedynamicevaluationmodelofhealthsustainabilityundermcdmbenchmarkinghealthindicatorstandards
AT rattanawongwanchai thedynamicevaluationmodelofhealthsustainabilityundermcdmbenchmarkinghealthindicatorstandards
AT vongmaneevarin thedynamicevaluationmodelofhealthsustainabilityundermcdmbenchmarkinghealthindicatorstandards
AT ritmaknutthawut dynamicevaluationmodelofhealthsustainabilityundermcdmbenchmarkinghealthindicatorstandards
AT rattanawongwanchai dynamicevaluationmodelofhealthsustainabilityundermcdmbenchmarkinghealthindicatorstandards
AT vongmaneevarin dynamicevaluationmodelofhealthsustainabilityundermcdmbenchmarkinghealthindicatorstandards