Cargando…

Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda

The literature reports some experiences regarding the design of integrated healthcare Performance Evaluation Systems (PES) applied in Low- and Middle-income Countries (LMIC). This study describes the design of an integrated and bottom-up PES aimed at evaluating healthcare services delivery in rural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belardi, Paolo, Corazza, Ilaria, Bonciani, Manila, Manenti, Fabio, Vainieri, Milena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9819807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010041
_version_ 1784865318799147008
author Belardi, Paolo
Corazza, Ilaria
Bonciani, Manila
Manenti, Fabio
Vainieri, Milena
author_facet Belardi, Paolo
Corazza, Ilaria
Bonciani, Manila
Manenti, Fabio
Vainieri, Milena
author_sort Belardi, Paolo
collection PubMed
description The literature reports some experiences regarding the design of integrated healthcare Performance Evaluation Systems (PES) applied in Low- and Middle-income Countries (LMIC). This study describes the design of an integrated and bottom-up PES aimed at evaluating healthcare services delivery in rural settings. The analysis involved four hospitals and their relative health districts in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda. The evaluation process was undertaken for those indicators that could be evaluated using the same reference standard. The evaluation scores were determined through the international standards identified in the literature or through benchmarking assessment. Both administrative and health data were extracted from the hospitals’ registers and District Health Information Systems (DHIS) from 2017 to 2020. We defined 128 indicators: 88 were calculated at the hospital level and 40 at the health district level. The evaluation process was undertaken for 48 indicators. The evaluated indicators are represented using effective graphical tools. In settings characterised by multiple healthcare providers, this framework may contribute to achieving good governance through performance evaluation, benchmarking, and accountability. It may promote evidence-based decision-making in the planning and allocation of resources, thus ultimately fostering quality improvement processes and practices, both at the hospital and health district level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9819807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98198072023-01-07 Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda Belardi, Paolo Corazza, Ilaria Bonciani, Manila Manenti, Fabio Vainieri, Milena Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The literature reports some experiences regarding the design of integrated healthcare Performance Evaluation Systems (PES) applied in Low- and Middle-income Countries (LMIC). This study describes the design of an integrated and bottom-up PES aimed at evaluating healthcare services delivery in rural settings. The analysis involved four hospitals and their relative health districts in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda. The evaluation process was undertaken for those indicators that could be evaluated using the same reference standard. The evaluation scores were determined through the international standards identified in the literature or through benchmarking assessment. Both administrative and health data were extracted from the hospitals’ registers and District Health Information Systems (DHIS) from 2017 to 2020. We defined 128 indicators: 88 were calculated at the hospital level and 40 at the health district level. The evaluation process was undertaken for 48 indicators. The evaluated indicators are represented using effective graphical tools. In settings characterised by multiple healthcare providers, this framework may contribute to achieving good governance through performance evaluation, benchmarking, and accountability. It may promote evidence-based decision-making in the planning and allocation of resources, thus ultimately fostering quality improvement processes and practices, both at the hospital and health district level. MDPI 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9819807/ /pubmed/36612364 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010041 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Belardi, Paolo
Corazza, Ilaria
Bonciani, Manila
Manenti, Fabio
Vainieri, Milena
Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda
title Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda
title_full Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda
title_fullStr Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda
title_short Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda
title_sort evaluating healthcare performance in low- and middle-income countries: a pilot study on selected settings in ethiopia, tanzania, and uganda
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9819807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010041
work_keys_str_mv AT belardipaolo evaluatinghealthcareperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesapilotstudyonselectedsettingsinethiopiatanzaniaanduganda
AT corazzailaria evaluatinghealthcareperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesapilotstudyonselectedsettingsinethiopiatanzaniaanduganda
AT boncianimanila evaluatinghealthcareperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesapilotstudyonselectedsettingsinethiopiatanzaniaanduganda
AT manentifabio evaluatinghealthcareperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesapilotstudyonselectedsettingsinethiopiatanzaniaanduganda
AT vainierimilena evaluatinghealthcareperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesapilotstudyonselectedsettingsinethiopiatanzaniaanduganda