Cargando…

Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China

Generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures have been used for estimating utility value, which is then used for calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). HRQoL measures may not capture many of the relevant and important non-health aspects of quality of life. The well-being of olde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Runhua, Mao, Zhuxin, Yang, Zhihao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9819892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612595
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010277
_version_ 1784865339468677120
author Liu, Runhua
Mao, Zhuxin
Yang, Zhihao
author_facet Liu, Runhua
Mao, Zhuxin
Yang, Zhihao
author_sort Liu, Runhua
collection PubMed
description Generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures have been used for estimating utility value, which is then used for calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). HRQoL measures may not capture many of the relevant and important non-health aspects of quality of life. The well-being of older people (WOOP) instrument was first developed in the Netherlands. This study aimed to validate this new instrument among older people in China. WOOP was first translated into simplified Chinese (for use in Mainland China) by two experienced translators. From July to August 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenience sample of 500 older people in Southwestern China. Older people who provided consent reported their demographic information and completed the simplified Chinese version of the WOOP instrument using a pencil and paper. The feasibility of WOOP was determined by the percentage of missing responses. Then, using the data without any missing responses, we examined the item response distributions, pairwise Spearman correlations, underlying factors, and known-group validity of WOOP. Among the nine items of WOOP, three had more than 10% missing responses. The response distributions of the nine items were overall good without signs of ceiling and floor effects. The correlations among the WOOP items were low. A two-factor exploratory factor analysis model suggested that the WOOP items can be categorized into either internal or external well-being items. Good known-group validity results were found. Some WOOP items may not be easily understood by a small proportion of rural residents. However, other results have suggested WOOP to be a valid instrument for measuring the well-being of the elderly in China. The availability of WOOP enables the measurement of well-being-related utility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9819892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98198922023-01-07 Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China Liu, Runhua Mao, Zhuxin Yang, Zhihao Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures have been used for estimating utility value, which is then used for calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). HRQoL measures may not capture many of the relevant and important non-health aspects of quality of life. The well-being of older people (WOOP) instrument was first developed in the Netherlands. This study aimed to validate this new instrument among older people in China. WOOP was first translated into simplified Chinese (for use in Mainland China) by two experienced translators. From July to August 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenience sample of 500 older people in Southwestern China. Older people who provided consent reported their demographic information and completed the simplified Chinese version of the WOOP instrument using a pencil and paper. The feasibility of WOOP was determined by the percentage of missing responses. Then, using the data without any missing responses, we examined the item response distributions, pairwise Spearman correlations, underlying factors, and known-group validity of WOOP. Among the nine items of WOOP, three had more than 10% missing responses. The response distributions of the nine items were overall good without signs of ceiling and floor effects. The correlations among the WOOP items were low. A two-factor exploratory factor analysis model suggested that the WOOP items can be categorized into either internal or external well-being items. Good known-group validity results were found. Some WOOP items may not be easily understood by a small proportion of rural residents. However, other results have suggested WOOP to be a valid instrument for measuring the well-being of the elderly in China. The availability of WOOP enables the measurement of well-being-related utility. MDPI 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9819892/ /pubmed/36612595 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010277 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Runhua
Mao, Zhuxin
Yang, Zhihao
Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China
title Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China
title_full Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China
title_fullStr Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China
title_full_unstemmed Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China
title_short Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China
title_sort validating the well-being of older people (woop) instrument in china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9819892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36612595
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010277
work_keys_str_mv AT liurunhua validatingthewellbeingofolderpeoplewoopinstrumentinchina
AT maozhuxin validatingthewellbeingofolderpeoplewoopinstrumentinchina
AT yangzhihao validatingthewellbeingofolderpeoplewoopinstrumentinchina