Cargando…
Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Myopia is a global public health problem affecting quality of life and work productivity. Data is scarce regarding the effects of near work on myopia. Providing a larger meta-analysis with life-long perspective, including adults and occupational exposure seemed needed. Methods: We search...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36613196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010875 |
_version_ | 1784865438702764032 |
---|---|
author | Dutheil, Frédéric Oueslati, Tharwa Delamarre, Louis Castanon, Joris Maurin, Caroline Chiambaretta, Frédéric Baker, Julien S. Ugbolue, Ukadike C. Zak, Marek Lakbar, Ines Pereira, Bruno Navel, Valentin |
author_facet | Dutheil, Frédéric Oueslati, Tharwa Delamarre, Louis Castanon, Joris Maurin, Caroline Chiambaretta, Frédéric Baker, Julien S. Ugbolue, Ukadike C. Zak, Marek Lakbar, Ines Pereira, Bruno Navel, Valentin |
author_sort | Dutheil, Frédéric |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Myopia is a global public health problem affecting quality of life and work productivity. Data is scarce regarding the effects of near work on myopia. Providing a larger meta-analysis with life-long perspective, including adults and occupational exposure seemed needed. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Science Direct for studies reporting myopia prevalence in near work. Myopia was defined as a mean spherical equivalent ≤ −0.50 diopter. We performed a meta-analysis using random-effects model on myopia prevalence, myopia progression per year, and odds ratio (OR) of myopia in near work, completed by subgroup analyses and meta-regressions on patients’ characteristics, type of work in adults, geographic zones, time and characteristics of near work. Results: We included 78 studies, representing a total of 254,037 participants, aged from 6 to 39 years. The global prevalence of myopia in near work was 35% (95% CI: 30 to 41%), with a prevalence of 31% (95% CI: 26 to 37%) in children and 46% (95% CI: 30 to 62%) in adults. Myopia progression was −0.39 diopters per year (−0.53 to −0.24 D/year), ranging from −0.44 (−0.57 to −0.31) in children to −0.25 D/year (−0.56 to 0.06) in adults. The odds of myopia in workers exposed vs. non-exposed to near work were increased by 26% (18 to 34%), by 31% (21 to 42%) in children and 21% (6 to 35%) in adults. Prevalence of myopia was higher in adults compared to children (Coefficient 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.27). Conclusions: Near work conditions, including occupational exposure in adults, could be associated with myopia. Targeted prevention should be implemented in the workplace. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9820324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98203242023-01-07 Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Dutheil, Frédéric Oueslati, Tharwa Delamarre, Louis Castanon, Joris Maurin, Caroline Chiambaretta, Frédéric Baker, Julien S. Ugbolue, Ukadike C. Zak, Marek Lakbar, Ines Pereira, Bruno Navel, Valentin Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Background: Myopia is a global public health problem affecting quality of life and work productivity. Data is scarce regarding the effects of near work on myopia. Providing a larger meta-analysis with life-long perspective, including adults and occupational exposure seemed needed. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Science Direct for studies reporting myopia prevalence in near work. Myopia was defined as a mean spherical equivalent ≤ −0.50 diopter. We performed a meta-analysis using random-effects model on myopia prevalence, myopia progression per year, and odds ratio (OR) of myopia in near work, completed by subgroup analyses and meta-regressions on patients’ characteristics, type of work in adults, geographic zones, time and characteristics of near work. Results: We included 78 studies, representing a total of 254,037 participants, aged from 6 to 39 years. The global prevalence of myopia in near work was 35% (95% CI: 30 to 41%), with a prevalence of 31% (95% CI: 26 to 37%) in children and 46% (95% CI: 30 to 62%) in adults. Myopia progression was −0.39 diopters per year (−0.53 to −0.24 D/year), ranging from −0.44 (−0.57 to −0.31) in children to −0.25 D/year (−0.56 to 0.06) in adults. The odds of myopia in workers exposed vs. non-exposed to near work were increased by 26% (18 to 34%), by 31% (21 to 42%) in children and 21% (6 to 35%) in adults. Prevalence of myopia was higher in adults compared to children (Coefficient 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.27). Conclusions: Near work conditions, including occupational exposure in adults, could be associated with myopia. Targeted prevention should be implemented in the workplace. MDPI 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9820324/ /pubmed/36613196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010875 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Dutheil, Frédéric Oueslati, Tharwa Delamarre, Louis Castanon, Joris Maurin, Caroline Chiambaretta, Frédéric Baker, Julien S. Ugbolue, Ukadike C. Zak, Marek Lakbar, Ines Pereira, Bruno Navel, Valentin Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | myopia and near work: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36613196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010875 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dutheilfrederic myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT oueslatitharwa myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT delamarrelouis myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT castanonjoris myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maurincaroline myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chiambarettafrederic myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bakerjuliens myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ugbolueukadikec myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zakmarek myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lakbarines myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pereirabruno myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT navelvalentin myopiaandnearworkasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |