Cargando…

The Efficacy of Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A 15-Year Mono-Institutional Study

The histological diagnosis of sarcoma can be difficult as it sometimes requires the combination of morphological and immunophenotypic analyses with molecular tests. A total of 2705 tissue samples of sarcoma consecutively collected from 2006 until 2020 that had undergone molecular analysis were asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benini, Stefania, Gamberi, Gabriella, Cocchi, Stefania, Magagnoli, Giovanna, Fortunato, Angela Rosa, Sciulli, Enrica, Righi, Alberto, Gambarotti, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010632
_version_ 1784865532812460032
author Benini, Stefania
Gamberi, Gabriella
Cocchi, Stefania
Magagnoli, Giovanna
Fortunato, Angela Rosa
Sciulli, Enrica
Righi, Alberto
Gambarotti, Marco
author_facet Benini, Stefania
Gamberi, Gabriella
Cocchi, Stefania
Magagnoli, Giovanna
Fortunato, Angela Rosa
Sciulli, Enrica
Righi, Alberto
Gambarotti, Marco
author_sort Benini, Stefania
collection PubMed
description The histological diagnosis of sarcoma can be difficult as it sometimes requires the combination of morphological and immunophenotypic analyses with molecular tests. A total of 2705 tissue samples of sarcoma consecutively collected from 2006 until 2020 that had undergone molecular analysis were assessed to evaluate their diagnostic utility compared with histological assessments. A total of 3051 molecular analyses were performed, including 1484 gene fusions tested by c/qRT–PCR, 992 gene rearrangements analysed by FISH, 433 analyses of the gene status of MDM2, 126 mutational analyses and 16 NGS analysis. Of the samples analysed, 68% were from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue and 32% were from frozen tissue. C/qRT–PCR and FISH analyses were conclusive on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in 74% and 76% of samples, respectively, but the combination of the two methods gave us conclusive results in 96% and 89% of frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, respectively. We demonstrate the utility of c/qRT–PCR and FISH for sarcoma diagnosis and that each has advantages in specific contexts. We conclude that it is possible to accurately predict the sarcoma subtype using a panel of different subtype-specific FISH probes and c/qRT–PCR assays, thereby greatly facilitating the differential diagnosis of these tumours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9820733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98207332023-01-07 The Efficacy of Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A 15-Year Mono-Institutional Study Benini, Stefania Gamberi, Gabriella Cocchi, Stefania Magagnoli, Giovanna Fortunato, Angela Rosa Sciulli, Enrica Righi, Alberto Gambarotti, Marco Int J Mol Sci Article The histological diagnosis of sarcoma can be difficult as it sometimes requires the combination of morphological and immunophenotypic analyses with molecular tests. A total of 2705 tissue samples of sarcoma consecutively collected from 2006 until 2020 that had undergone molecular analysis were assessed to evaluate their diagnostic utility compared with histological assessments. A total of 3051 molecular analyses were performed, including 1484 gene fusions tested by c/qRT–PCR, 992 gene rearrangements analysed by FISH, 433 analyses of the gene status of MDM2, 126 mutational analyses and 16 NGS analysis. Of the samples analysed, 68% were from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue and 32% were from frozen tissue. C/qRT–PCR and FISH analyses were conclusive on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in 74% and 76% of samples, respectively, but the combination of the two methods gave us conclusive results in 96% and 89% of frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, respectively. We demonstrate the utility of c/qRT–PCR and FISH for sarcoma diagnosis and that each has advantages in specific contexts. We conclude that it is possible to accurately predict the sarcoma subtype using a panel of different subtype-specific FISH probes and c/qRT–PCR assays, thereby greatly facilitating the differential diagnosis of these tumours. MDPI 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9820733/ /pubmed/36614077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010632 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Benini, Stefania
Gamberi, Gabriella
Cocchi, Stefania
Magagnoli, Giovanna
Fortunato, Angela Rosa
Sciulli, Enrica
Righi, Alberto
Gambarotti, Marco
The Efficacy of Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A 15-Year Mono-Institutional Study
title The Efficacy of Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A 15-Year Mono-Institutional Study
title_full The Efficacy of Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A 15-Year Mono-Institutional Study
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A 15-Year Mono-Institutional Study
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A 15-Year Mono-Institutional Study
title_short The Efficacy of Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A 15-Year Mono-Institutional Study
title_sort efficacy of molecular analysis in the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a 15-year mono-institutional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010632
work_keys_str_mv AT beninistefania theefficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT gamberigabriella theefficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT cocchistefania theefficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT magagnoligiovanna theefficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT fortunatoangelarosa theefficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT sciullienrica theefficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT righialberto theefficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT gambarottimarco theefficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT beninistefania efficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT gamberigabriella efficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT cocchistefania efficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT magagnoligiovanna efficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT fortunatoangelarosa efficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT sciullienrica efficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT righialberto efficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy
AT gambarottimarco efficacyofmolecularanalysisinthediagnosisofboneandsofttissuesarcomaa15yearmonoinstitutionalstudy