Cargando…
Treatment of De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients With Calcineurin Inhibitor–free, Belatacept Plus Everolimus–based Immunosuppression
Compared with calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppression, belatacept (BELA)-based treatment has been associated with better renal function but higher acute rejection rates. This phase 2 study (NCT02137239) compared the antirejection efficacy of BELA plus everolimus (EVL) with tacrolimus (TAC) plu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001419 |
_version_ | 1784865545367060480 |
---|---|
author | Peddi, V. Ram Marder, Bradley Gaite, Luis Oberholzer, Jose Goldberg, Ryan Pearson, Thomas Yang, Harold Allamassey, Lisa Polinsky, Martin Formica, Richard N. |
author_facet | Peddi, V. Ram Marder, Bradley Gaite, Luis Oberholzer, Jose Goldberg, Ryan Pearson, Thomas Yang, Harold Allamassey, Lisa Polinsky, Martin Formica, Richard N. |
author_sort | Peddi, V. Ram |
collection | PubMed |
description | Compared with calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppression, belatacept (BELA)-based treatment has been associated with better renal function but higher acute rejection rates. This phase 2 study (NCT02137239) compared the antirejection efficacy of BELA plus everolimus (EVL) with tacrolimus (TAC) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), each following lymphocyte-depleting induction and rapid corticosteroid withdrawal. METHODS. Patients who were de novo renal transplant recipients seropositive for Epstein-Barr virus were randomized to receive BELA+EVL or TAC+MMF maintenance therapy after rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction and up to 7 d of corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection at month 6. RESULTS. Because of an unanticipated BELA supply constraint, enrollment was prematurely terminated at 68 patients, of whom 58 were randomized and transplanted (intention-to-treat [ITT] population: n = 26, BELA+EVL; n = 32, TAC+MMF). However, 25 patients received BELA+EVL‚ and 33 received TAC+MMF (modified ITT population). In the ITT population, the 6-mo biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 7.7% versus 9.4% in the BELA+EVL versus TAC+MMF group. The corresponding 24-mo biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 19.2% versus 12.5% in the ITT population and 16.0% versus 15.2% in the mITT population; all events were Banff severity grade ≤IIA and similar between groups. One patient in each group experienced graft loss unrelated to acute rejection. The 24-mo mean unadjusted estimated glomerular filtration rates were 71.8 versus 68.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the BELA+EVL versus TAC+MMF groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was reported for 1 patient in each group. No deaths or unexpected adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS. A steroid-free maintenance regimen of BELA+EVL may be associated with biopsy-proven acute rejection rates comparable to TAC+MMF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9820789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98207892023-01-24 Treatment of De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients With Calcineurin Inhibitor–free, Belatacept Plus Everolimus–based Immunosuppression Peddi, V. Ram Marder, Bradley Gaite, Luis Oberholzer, Jose Goldberg, Ryan Pearson, Thomas Yang, Harold Allamassey, Lisa Polinsky, Martin Formica, Richard N. Transplant Direct Kidney Transplantation Compared with calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppression, belatacept (BELA)-based treatment has been associated with better renal function but higher acute rejection rates. This phase 2 study (NCT02137239) compared the antirejection efficacy of BELA plus everolimus (EVL) with tacrolimus (TAC) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), each following lymphocyte-depleting induction and rapid corticosteroid withdrawal. METHODS. Patients who were de novo renal transplant recipients seropositive for Epstein-Barr virus were randomized to receive BELA+EVL or TAC+MMF maintenance therapy after rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction and up to 7 d of corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection at month 6. RESULTS. Because of an unanticipated BELA supply constraint, enrollment was prematurely terminated at 68 patients, of whom 58 were randomized and transplanted (intention-to-treat [ITT] population: n = 26, BELA+EVL; n = 32, TAC+MMF). However, 25 patients received BELA+EVL‚ and 33 received TAC+MMF (modified ITT population). In the ITT population, the 6-mo biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 7.7% versus 9.4% in the BELA+EVL versus TAC+MMF group. The corresponding 24-mo biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 19.2% versus 12.5% in the ITT population and 16.0% versus 15.2% in the mITT population; all events were Banff severity grade ≤IIA and similar between groups. One patient in each group experienced graft loss unrelated to acute rejection. The 24-mo mean unadjusted estimated glomerular filtration rates were 71.8 versus 68.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the BELA+EVL versus TAC+MMF groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was reported for 1 patient in each group. No deaths or unexpected adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS. A steroid-free maintenance regimen of BELA+EVL may be associated with biopsy-proven acute rejection rates comparable to TAC+MMF. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9820789/ /pubmed/36700062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001419 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Kidney Transplantation Peddi, V. Ram Marder, Bradley Gaite, Luis Oberholzer, Jose Goldberg, Ryan Pearson, Thomas Yang, Harold Allamassey, Lisa Polinsky, Martin Formica, Richard N. Treatment of De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients With Calcineurin Inhibitor–free, Belatacept Plus Everolimus–based Immunosuppression |
title | Treatment of De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients With Calcineurin Inhibitor–free, Belatacept Plus Everolimus–based Immunosuppression |
title_full | Treatment of De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients With Calcineurin Inhibitor–free, Belatacept Plus Everolimus–based Immunosuppression |
title_fullStr | Treatment of De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients With Calcineurin Inhibitor–free, Belatacept Plus Everolimus–based Immunosuppression |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients With Calcineurin Inhibitor–free, Belatacept Plus Everolimus–based Immunosuppression |
title_short | Treatment of De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients With Calcineurin Inhibitor–free, Belatacept Plus Everolimus–based Immunosuppression |
title_sort | treatment of de novo renal transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor–free, belatacept plus everolimus–based immunosuppression |
topic | Kidney Transplantation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001419 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peddivram treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression AT marderbradley treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression AT gaiteluis treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression AT oberholzerjose treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression AT goldbergryan treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression AT pearsonthomas treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression AT yangharold treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression AT allamasseylisa treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression AT polinskymartin treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression AT formicarichardn treatmentofdenovorenaltransplantrecipientswithcalcineurininhibitorfreebelataceptpluseverolimusbasedimmunosuppression |