Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading causes of death among infectious diseases worldwide. Early screening and diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is crucial in TB control, and tend to benefit from artificial intelligence. Here, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a variety...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615102 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010303 |
_version_ | 1784865579643961344 |
---|---|
author | Zhan, Yuejuan Wang, Yuqi Zhang, Wendi Ying, Binwu Wang, Chengdi |
author_facet | Zhan, Yuejuan Wang, Yuqi Zhang, Wendi Ying, Binwu Wang, Chengdi |
author_sort | Zhan, Yuejuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading causes of death among infectious diseases worldwide. Early screening and diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is crucial in TB control, and tend to benefit from artificial intelligence. Here, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a variety of artificial intelligence methods in medical imaging for PTB. We searched MEDLINE and Embase with the OVID platform to identify trials published update to November 2022 that evaluated the effectiveness of artificial-intelligence-based software in medical imaging of patients with PTB. After data extraction, the quality of studies was assessed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using a bivariate random-effects model. In total, 3987 references were initially identified and 61 studies were finally included, covering a wide range of 124,959 individuals. The pooled sensitivity and the specificity were 91% (95% confidence interval (CI), 89–93%) and 65% (54–75%), respectively, in clinical trials, and 94% (89–96%) and 95% (91–97%), respectively, in model-development studies. These findings have demonstrated that artificial-intelligence-based software could serve as an accurate tool to diagnose PTB in medical imaging. However, standardized reporting guidance regarding AI-specific trials and multicenter clinical trials is urgently needed to truly transform this cutting-edge technology into clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9820940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98209402023-01-07 Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhan, Yuejuan Wang, Yuqi Zhang, Wendi Ying, Binwu Wang, Chengdi J Clin Med Systematic Review Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading causes of death among infectious diseases worldwide. Early screening and diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is crucial in TB control, and tend to benefit from artificial intelligence. Here, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a variety of artificial intelligence methods in medical imaging for PTB. We searched MEDLINE and Embase with the OVID platform to identify trials published update to November 2022 that evaluated the effectiveness of artificial-intelligence-based software in medical imaging of patients with PTB. After data extraction, the quality of studies was assessed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using a bivariate random-effects model. In total, 3987 references were initially identified and 61 studies were finally included, covering a wide range of 124,959 individuals. The pooled sensitivity and the specificity were 91% (95% confidence interval (CI), 89–93%) and 65% (54–75%), respectively, in clinical trials, and 94% (89–96%) and 95% (91–97%), respectively, in model-development studies. These findings have demonstrated that artificial-intelligence-based software could serve as an accurate tool to diagnose PTB in medical imaging. However, standardized reporting guidance regarding AI-specific trials and multicenter clinical trials is urgently needed to truly transform this cutting-edge technology into clinical practice. MDPI 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9820940/ /pubmed/36615102 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010303 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Zhan, Yuejuan Wang, Yuqi Zhang, Wendi Ying, Binwu Wang, Chengdi Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of the artificial intelligence methods in medical imaging for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615102 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanyuejuan diagnosticaccuracyoftheartificialintelligencemethodsinmedicalimagingforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyuqi diagnosticaccuracyoftheartificialintelligencemethodsinmedicalimagingforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangwendi diagnosticaccuracyoftheartificialintelligencemethodsinmedicalimagingforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yingbinwu diagnosticaccuracyoftheartificialintelligencemethodsinmedicalimagingforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangchengdi diagnosticaccuracyoftheartificialintelligencemethodsinmedicalimagingforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |