Cargando…

Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The study aimed to compare the consistency of MRI interpretation of endolymphatic hydrops qualitative assessment of inner ear structures performed by independent observers. MRI with a delayed post-contrast 3D-FLAIR sequence was performed to visualize EH in patients suspected of having or diagnosed w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wnuk, Emilia, Lachowska, Magdalena, Jasińska-Nowacka, Agnieszka, Maj, Edyta, Niemczyk, Kazimierz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010202
_version_ 1784865597059760128
author Wnuk, Emilia
Lachowska, Magdalena
Jasińska-Nowacka, Agnieszka
Maj, Edyta
Niemczyk, Kazimierz
author_facet Wnuk, Emilia
Lachowska, Magdalena
Jasińska-Nowacka, Agnieszka
Maj, Edyta
Niemczyk, Kazimierz
author_sort Wnuk, Emilia
collection PubMed
description The study aimed to compare the consistency of MRI interpretation of endolymphatic hydrops qualitative assessment of inner ear structures performed by independent observers. MRI with a delayed post-contrast 3D-FLAIR sequence was performed to visualize EH in patients suspected of having or diagnosed with MD. The scans were analyzed independently by three observers. In total, 220 ears were evaluated and, of these, 75 had definite MD, five probable MD, 67 with other Menieriform symptoms, and 73 were asymptomatic. Significant differences in cochlear endolymphatic hydrops (CoEH) grading between all observers were observed. On the Barath scale of vestibular endolymphatic hydrops (VEH), differences were found between the radiologists and otorhinolaryngologist in grading. No differences were noted in VEH on the Bernaerts scale and increased perilymphatic enhancement. Our study showed that evaluation of vestibular endolymphatic hydrops is repeatable between observers and easy to learn. It proved that Bernaerts’ modification increased the sensitivity of EH diagnosis. Both parameters, CoEH and VEH, may serve as a differentiation method of EH from normal ears. The distinction between normal and hydropic ears is much easier to perform than EH grading. Therefore, it may be used to diagnose MD rather than EH staging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9821015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98210152023-01-07 Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Wnuk, Emilia Lachowska, Magdalena Jasińska-Nowacka, Agnieszka Maj, Edyta Niemczyk, Kazimierz J Clin Med Article The study aimed to compare the consistency of MRI interpretation of endolymphatic hydrops qualitative assessment of inner ear structures performed by independent observers. MRI with a delayed post-contrast 3D-FLAIR sequence was performed to visualize EH in patients suspected of having or diagnosed with MD. The scans were analyzed independently by three observers. In total, 220 ears were evaluated and, of these, 75 had definite MD, five probable MD, 67 with other Menieriform symptoms, and 73 were asymptomatic. Significant differences in cochlear endolymphatic hydrops (CoEH) grading between all observers were observed. On the Barath scale of vestibular endolymphatic hydrops (VEH), differences were found between the radiologists and otorhinolaryngologist in grading. No differences were noted in VEH on the Bernaerts scale and increased perilymphatic enhancement. Our study showed that evaluation of vestibular endolymphatic hydrops is repeatable between observers and easy to learn. It proved that Bernaerts’ modification increased the sensitivity of EH diagnosis. Both parameters, CoEH and VEH, may serve as a differentiation method of EH from normal ears. The distinction between normal and hydropic ears is much easier to perform than EH grading. Therefore, it may be used to diagnose MD rather than EH staging. MDPI 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9821015/ /pubmed/36615003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010202 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wnuk, Emilia
Lachowska, Magdalena
Jasińska-Nowacka, Agnieszka
Maj, Edyta
Niemczyk, Kazimierz
Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort reliability of endolymphatic hydrops qualitative assessment in magnetic resonance imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010202
work_keys_str_mv AT wnukemilia reliabilityofendolymphatichydropsqualitativeassessmentinmagneticresonanceimaging
AT lachowskamagdalena reliabilityofendolymphatichydropsqualitativeassessmentinmagneticresonanceimaging
AT jasinskanowackaagnieszka reliabilityofendolymphatichydropsqualitativeassessmentinmagneticresonanceimaging
AT majedyta reliabilityofendolymphatichydropsqualitativeassessmentinmagneticresonanceimaging
AT niemczykkazimierz reliabilityofendolymphatichydropsqualitativeassessmentinmagneticresonanceimaging