Cargando…

Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies

Hemorrhagic shock (HS) management is based on a timely, rapid, definitive source control of bleeding/s and on blood loss replacement. Stopping the hemorrhage from progressing from any named and visible vessel is the main stem fundamental praxis of efficacy and effectiveness and an essential, obligat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bonanno, Fabrizio G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010260
_version_ 1784865598620041216
author Bonanno, Fabrizio G.
author_facet Bonanno, Fabrizio G.
author_sort Bonanno, Fabrizio G.
collection PubMed
description Hemorrhagic shock (HS) management is based on a timely, rapid, definitive source control of bleeding/s and on blood loss replacement. Stopping the hemorrhage from progressing from any named and visible vessel is the main stem fundamental praxis of efficacy and effectiveness and an essential, obligatory, life-saving step. Blood loss replacement serves the purpose of preventing ischemia/reperfusion toxemia and optimizing tissue oxygenation and microcirculation dynamics. The “physiological classification of HS” dictates the timely management and suits the ‘titrated hypotensive resuscitation’ tactics and the ‘damage control surgery’ strategy. In any hypotensive but not yet critical shock, the body’s response to a fluid load test determines the cut-off point between compensation and progression between the time for adopting conservative treatment and preparing for surgery or rushing to the theater for rapid bleeding source control. Up to 20% of the total blood volume is given to refill the unstressed venous return volume. In any critical level of shock where, ab initio, the patient manifests signs indicating critical physiology and impending cardiac arrest or cardiovascular accident, the balance between the life-saving reflexes stretched to the maximum and the insufficient distal perfusion (blood, oxygen, and substrates) remains in a liable and delicate equilibrium, susceptible to any minimal change or interfering variable. In a cardiac arrest by exsanguination, the core of the physiological issue remains the rapid restoration of a sufficient venous return, allowing the heart to pump it back into systemic circulation either by open massage via sternotomy or anterolateral thoracotomy or spontaneously after aorta clamping in the chest or in the abdomen at the epigastrium under extracorporeal resuscitation and induced hypothermia. This is the only way to prevent ischemic damage to the brain and the heart. This is accomplishable rapidly and efficiently only by a direct approach, which is a crush laparotomy if the bleeding is coming from an abdominal +/− lower limb site or rapid sternotomy/anterolateral thoracotomy if the bleeding is coming from a chest +/− upper limbs site. Without first stopping the bleeding and refilling the heart, any further exercise is doomed to failure. Direct source control via laparotomy/thoracotomy, with the concomitant or soon following venous refilling, are the two essential, initial life-saving steps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9821021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98210212023-01-07 Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies Bonanno, Fabrizio G. J Clin Med Review Hemorrhagic shock (HS) management is based on a timely, rapid, definitive source control of bleeding/s and on blood loss replacement. Stopping the hemorrhage from progressing from any named and visible vessel is the main stem fundamental praxis of efficacy and effectiveness and an essential, obligatory, life-saving step. Blood loss replacement serves the purpose of preventing ischemia/reperfusion toxemia and optimizing tissue oxygenation and microcirculation dynamics. The “physiological classification of HS” dictates the timely management and suits the ‘titrated hypotensive resuscitation’ tactics and the ‘damage control surgery’ strategy. In any hypotensive but not yet critical shock, the body’s response to a fluid load test determines the cut-off point between compensation and progression between the time for adopting conservative treatment and preparing for surgery or rushing to the theater for rapid bleeding source control. Up to 20% of the total blood volume is given to refill the unstressed venous return volume. In any critical level of shock where, ab initio, the patient manifests signs indicating critical physiology and impending cardiac arrest or cardiovascular accident, the balance between the life-saving reflexes stretched to the maximum and the insufficient distal perfusion (blood, oxygen, and substrates) remains in a liable and delicate equilibrium, susceptible to any minimal change or interfering variable. In a cardiac arrest by exsanguination, the core of the physiological issue remains the rapid restoration of a sufficient venous return, allowing the heart to pump it back into systemic circulation either by open massage via sternotomy or anterolateral thoracotomy or spontaneously after aorta clamping in the chest or in the abdomen at the epigastrium under extracorporeal resuscitation and induced hypothermia. This is the only way to prevent ischemic damage to the brain and the heart. This is accomplishable rapidly and efficiently only by a direct approach, which is a crush laparotomy if the bleeding is coming from an abdominal +/− lower limb site or rapid sternotomy/anterolateral thoracotomy if the bleeding is coming from a chest +/− upper limbs site. Without first stopping the bleeding and refilling the heart, any further exercise is doomed to failure. Direct source control via laparotomy/thoracotomy, with the concomitant or soon following venous refilling, are the two essential, initial life-saving steps. MDPI 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9821021/ /pubmed/36615060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010260 Text en © 2022 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bonanno, Fabrizio G.
Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies
title Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies
title_full Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies
title_fullStr Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies
title_short Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies
title_sort management of hemorrhagic shock: physiology approach, timing and strategies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010260
work_keys_str_mv AT bonannofabriziog managementofhemorrhagicshockphysiologyapproachtimingandstrategies