Cargando…
Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study
(1) Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility of measuring the intrapelvic pressure (IPP) during flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) with a PressureWire and to optimize safety by assessing IPP during surgery. (2) Methods: Patients undergoing f-URS for different treatments were recruited. A PressureWir...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010147 |
_version_ | 1784865600715096064 |
---|---|
author | Sierra, Alba Corrales, Mariela Kolvatzis, Merkourios Doizi, Steeve Traxer, Olivier |
author_facet | Sierra, Alba Corrales, Mariela Kolvatzis, Merkourios Doizi, Steeve Traxer, Olivier |
author_sort | Sierra, Alba |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility of measuring the intrapelvic pressure (IPP) during flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) with a PressureWire and to optimize safety by assessing IPP during surgery. (2) Methods: Patients undergoing f-URS for different treatments were recruited. A PressureWire (0.014”, St. Jude Medical, Little Canada, MN, USA) was placed into the renal cavities to measure IPP. Gravity irrigation at 40 cmH(2)O over the patient and a hand-assisted irrigation system were used. Pressures were monitored in real time and recorded for analysis. Fluid balance and postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) were documented. (3) Results: Twenty patients undergoing f-URS were included with successful IPP monitoring. The median baseline IPP was 13.6 (6.8–47.6) cmH(2)O. After the placement of the UAS, the median IPP was 17 (8–44.6) cmH(2)O. With irrigation pressure set at 40 cmH(2)O without forced irrigation, the median IPP was 34 (19–81.6) cmH(2)O. Median IPP during laser lithotripsy, with and without the use of on-demand forced irrigation, was 61.2 (27.2–149.5) cmH(2)O. The maximum pressure peaks recorded during forced irrigation ranged from 54.4 to 236.6 cmH(2)O. After the surgery, 3 patients (15%) presented UTI; 2 of them had a positive preoperative urine culture, previously treated, and a positive fluid balance observed after the surgery. (4) Conclusion: Based on our experience, continuous monitoring of IPP with a wire is easy to reproduce, effective, and safe. In addition, it allows us to identify and avoid high IPPs, which may affect surgery-related complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9821029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98210292023-01-07 Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study Sierra, Alba Corrales, Mariela Kolvatzis, Merkourios Doizi, Steeve Traxer, Olivier J Clin Med Article (1) Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility of measuring the intrapelvic pressure (IPP) during flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) with a PressureWire and to optimize safety by assessing IPP during surgery. (2) Methods: Patients undergoing f-URS for different treatments were recruited. A PressureWire (0.014”, St. Jude Medical, Little Canada, MN, USA) was placed into the renal cavities to measure IPP. Gravity irrigation at 40 cmH(2)O over the patient and a hand-assisted irrigation system were used. Pressures were monitored in real time and recorded for analysis. Fluid balance and postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) were documented. (3) Results: Twenty patients undergoing f-URS were included with successful IPP monitoring. The median baseline IPP was 13.6 (6.8–47.6) cmH(2)O. After the placement of the UAS, the median IPP was 17 (8–44.6) cmH(2)O. With irrigation pressure set at 40 cmH(2)O without forced irrigation, the median IPP was 34 (19–81.6) cmH(2)O. Median IPP during laser lithotripsy, with and without the use of on-demand forced irrigation, was 61.2 (27.2–149.5) cmH(2)O. The maximum pressure peaks recorded during forced irrigation ranged from 54.4 to 236.6 cmH(2)O. After the surgery, 3 patients (15%) presented UTI; 2 of them had a positive preoperative urine culture, previously treated, and a positive fluid balance observed after the surgery. (4) Conclusion: Based on our experience, continuous monitoring of IPP with a wire is easy to reproduce, effective, and safe. In addition, it allows us to identify and avoid high IPPs, which may affect surgery-related complications. MDPI 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9821029/ /pubmed/36614947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010147 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sierra, Alba Corrales, Mariela Kolvatzis, Merkourios Doizi, Steeve Traxer, Olivier Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study |
title | Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study |
title_full | Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study |
title_short | Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study |
title_sort | real time intrarenal pressure control during flexible ureterorrenscopy using a vascular pressurewire: pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sierraalba realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy AT corralesmariela realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy AT kolvatzismerkourios realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy AT doizisteeve realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy AT traxerolivier realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy |