Cargando…

Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study

(1) Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility of measuring the intrapelvic pressure (IPP) during flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) with a PressureWire and to optimize safety by assessing IPP during surgery. (2) Methods: Patients undergoing f-URS for different treatments were recruited. A PressureWir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sierra, Alba, Corrales, Mariela, Kolvatzis, Merkourios, Doizi, Steeve, Traxer, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010147
_version_ 1784865600715096064
author Sierra, Alba
Corrales, Mariela
Kolvatzis, Merkourios
Doizi, Steeve
Traxer, Olivier
author_facet Sierra, Alba
Corrales, Mariela
Kolvatzis, Merkourios
Doizi, Steeve
Traxer, Olivier
author_sort Sierra, Alba
collection PubMed
description (1) Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility of measuring the intrapelvic pressure (IPP) during flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) with a PressureWire and to optimize safety by assessing IPP during surgery. (2) Methods: Patients undergoing f-URS for different treatments were recruited. A PressureWire (0.014”, St. Jude Medical, Little Canada, MN, USA) was placed into the renal cavities to measure IPP. Gravity irrigation at 40 cmH(2)O over the patient and a hand-assisted irrigation system were used. Pressures were monitored in real time and recorded for analysis. Fluid balance and postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) were documented. (3) Results: Twenty patients undergoing f-URS were included with successful IPP monitoring. The median baseline IPP was 13.6 (6.8–47.6) cmH(2)O. After the placement of the UAS, the median IPP was 17 (8–44.6) cmH(2)O. With irrigation pressure set at 40 cmH(2)O without forced irrigation, the median IPP was 34 (19–81.6) cmH(2)O. Median IPP during laser lithotripsy, with and without the use of on-demand forced irrigation, was 61.2 (27.2–149.5) cmH(2)O. The maximum pressure peaks recorded during forced irrigation ranged from 54.4 to 236.6 cmH(2)O. After the surgery, 3 patients (15%) presented UTI; 2 of them had a positive preoperative urine culture, previously treated, and a positive fluid balance observed after the surgery. (4) Conclusion: Based on our experience, continuous monitoring of IPP with a wire is easy to reproduce, effective, and safe. In addition, it allows us to identify and avoid high IPPs, which may affect surgery-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9821029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98210292023-01-07 Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study Sierra, Alba Corrales, Mariela Kolvatzis, Merkourios Doizi, Steeve Traxer, Olivier J Clin Med Article (1) Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility of measuring the intrapelvic pressure (IPP) during flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) with a PressureWire and to optimize safety by assessing IPP during surgery. (2) Methods: Patients undergoing f-URS for different treatments were recruited. A PressureWire (0.014”, St. Jude Medical, Little Canada, MN, USA) was placed into the renal cavities to measure IPP. Gravity irrigation at 40 cmH(2)O over the patient and a hand-assisted irrigation system were used. Pressures were monitored in real time and recorded for analysis. Fluid balance and postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) were documented. (3) Results: Twenty patients undergoing f-URS were included with successful IPP monitoring. The median baseline IPP was 13.6 (6.8–47.6) cmH(2)O. After the placement of the UAS, the median IPP was 17 (8–44.6) cmH(2)O. With irrigation pressure set at 40 cmH(2)O without forced irrigation, the median IPP was 34 (19–81.6) cmH(2)O. Median IPP during laser lithotripsy, with and without the use of on-demand forced irrigation, was 61.2 (27.2–149.5) cmH(2)O. The maximum pressure peaks recorded during forced irrigation ranged from 54.4 to 236.6 cmH(2)O. After the surgery, 3 patients (15%) presented UTI; 2 of them had a positive preoperative urine culture, previously treated, and a positive fluid balance observed after the surgery. (4) Conclusion: Based on our experience, continuous monitoring of IPP with a wire is easy to reproduce, effective, and safe. In addition, it allows us to identify and avoid high IPPs, which may affect surgery-related complications. MDPI 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9821029/ /pubmed/36614947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010147 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sierra, Alba
Corrales, Mariela
Kolvatzis, Merkourios
Doizi, Steeve
Traxer, Olivier
Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study
title Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study
title_full Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study
title_fullStr Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study
title_short Real Time Intrarenal Pressure Control during Flexible Ureterorrenscopy Using a Vascular PressureWire: Pilot Study
title_sort real time intrarenal pressure control during flexible ureterorrenscopy using a vascular pressurewire: pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010147
work_keys_str_mv AT sierraalba realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy
AT corralesmariela realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy
AT kolvatzismerkourios realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy
AT doizisteeve realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy
AT traxerolivier realtimeintrarenalpressurecontrolduringflexibleureterorrenscopyusingavascularpressurewirepilotstudy