Cargando…
Which Surgery for Stage II–III Empyema Patients? Observational Single-Center Cohort Study of 719 Consecutive Patients †
Objective: Recent guidelines support the use of thoracoscopic surgery in stage II-III empyema; however, there is still debate regarding the best surgical approach. The aim of our study is to compare postoperative outcomes of VATS and open surgical approaches for the treatment of post-pneumonic empye...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010136 |
_version_ | 1784865648018456576 |
---|---|
author | Ricciardi, Sara Giovanniello, Delia Carleo, Francesco Di Martino, Marco Jaus, Massimo O. Mantovani, Sara Treggiari, Stefano Tritapepe, Luigi Cardillo, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Ricciardi, Sara Giovanniello, Delia Carleo, Francesco Di Martino, Marco Jaus, Massimo O. Mantovani, Sara Treggiari, Stefano Tritapepe, Luigi Cardillo, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Ricciardi, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Recent guidelines support the use of thoracoscopic surgery in stage II-III empyema; however, there is still debate regarding the best surgical approach. The aim of our study is to compare postoperative outcomes of VATS and open surgical approaches for the treatment of post-pneumonic empyema. Methods: Observational cohort study on prospectively collected cases of post-pneumonic empyema surgically treated in a single center (2000–2020). Patients were divided into an open group (OT, posterolateral muscle sparing thoracotomy) and VATS group (VT, 2 or 3 port ± utility incision). The primary outcome of the study was empyema resolution, assessed by the recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were mortality, complications, pain and return to daily life. All patients were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery in the outpatient clinic with a chest radiograph/CT scan. Results: In total, 719 consecutive patients were surgically treated for stage II–III empyema, with 644 belonging to the VT group and 75 to the OT group. All patients had a clinical history of pneumonia lasting no more than 6 months before surgery, and 553 (76.9%) had stage II empyema. Operative time was 92.7 ± 6.8 min for the OT group and 112.2 ± 7.4 for the VT group. The conversion rate was 8.4% (46/545) for stage II and 19.2% (19/99) for stage III. Twelve patients (1.86%) in the VT group and four patients (5.3%) in the OT group underwent additional surgery for bleeding. Postoperative mortality was 1.25% (9/719): 5.3% (4/75) in OT and 0.77% (5/644) in VT. Postoperative stay was 10 ± 6.5 days in OT and 8 ± 2.4 in VT. Overall morbidity was 14.7% (106/719): 21.3% (16/75) in OT and 13.9% (90/644) in VT. In VT, six patients (0.93%) showed recurrent empyema: five were treated with chest drainage and one with additional open surgery. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the VATS approach, showing a 99% success rate, shorter length of stay and lower postoperative morbidity, should be considered the treatment of choice for thoracic empyema. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9821231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98212312023-01-07 Which Surgery for Stage II–III Empyema Patients? Observational Single-Center Cohort Study of 719 Consecutive Patients † Ricciardi, Sara Giovanniello, Delia Carleo, Francesco Di Martino, Marco Jaus, Massimo O. Mantovani, Sara Treggiari, Stefano Tritapepe, Luigi Cardillo, Giuseppe J Clin Med Article Objective: Recent guidelines support the use of thoracoscopic surgery in stage II-III empyema; however, there is still debate regarding the best surgical approach. The aim of our study is to compare postoperative outcomes of VATS and open surgical approaches for the treatment of post-pneumonic empyema. Methods: Observational cohort study on prospectively collected cases of post-pneumonic empyema surgically treated in a single center (2000–2020). Patients were divided into an open group (OT, posterolateral muscle sparing thoracotomy) and VATS group (VT, 2 or 3 port ± utility incision). The primary outcome of the study was empyema resolution, assessed by the recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were mortality, complications, pain and return to daily life. All patients were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery in the outpatient clinic with a chest radiograph/CT scan. Results: In total, 719 consecutive patients were surgically treated for stage II–III empyema, with 644 belonging to the VT group and 75 to the OT group. All patients had a clinical history of pneumonia lasting no more than 6 months before surgery, and 553 (76.9%) had stage II empyema. Operative time was 92.7 ± 6.8 min for the OT group and 112.2 ± 7.4 for the VT group. The conversion rate was 8.4% (46/545) for stage II and 19.2% (19/99) for stage III. Twelve patients (1.86%) in the VT group and four patients (5.3%) in the OT group underwent additional surgery for bleeding. Postoperative mortality was 1.25% (9/719): 5.3% (4/75) in OT and 0.77% (5/644) in VT. Postoperative stay was 10 ± 6.5 days in OT and 8 ± 2.4 in VT. Overall morbidity was 14.7% (106/719): 21.3% (16/75) in OT and 13.9% (90/644) in VT. In VT, six patients (0.93%) showed recurrent empyema: five were treated with chest drainage and one with additional open surgery. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the VATS approach, showing a 99% success rate, shorter length of stay and lower postoperative morbidity, should be considered the treatment of choice for thoracic empyema. MDPI 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9821231/ /pubmed/36614937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010136 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ricciardi, Sara Giovanniello, Delia Carleo, Francesco Di Martino, Marco Jaus, Massimo O. Mantovani, Sara Treggiari, Stefano Tritapepe, Luigi Cardillo, Giuseppe Which Surgery for Stage II–III Empyema Patients? Observational Single-Center Cohort Study of 719 Consecutive Patients † |
title | Which Surgery for Stage II–III Empyema Patients? Observational Single-Center Cohort Study of 719 Consecutive Patients † |
title_full | Which Surgery for Stage II–III Empyema Patients? Observational Single-Center Cohort Study of 719 Consecutive Patients † |
title_fullStr | Which Surgery for Stage II–III Empyema Patients? Observational Single-Center Cohort Study of 719 Consecutive Patients † |
title_full_unstemmed | Which Surgery for Stage II–III Empyema Patients? Observational Single-Center Cohort Study of 719 Consecutive Patients † |
title_short | Which Surgery for Stage II–III Empyema Patients? Observational Single-Center Cohort Study of 719 Consecutive Patients † |
title_sort | which surgery for stage ii–iii empyema patients? observational single-center cohort study of 719 consecutive patients † |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ricciardisara whichsurgeryforstageiiiiiempyemapatientsobservationalsinglecentercohortstudyof719consecutivepatients AT giovanniellodelia whichsurgeryforstageiiiiiempyemapatientsobservationalsinglecentercohortstudyof719consecutivepatients AT carleofrancesco whichsurgeryforstageiiiiiempyemapatientsobservationalsinglecentercohortstudyof719consecutivepatients AT dimartinomarco whichsurgeryforstageiiiiiempyemapatientsobservationalsinglecentercohortstudyof719consecutivepatients AT jausmassimoo whichsurgeryforstageiiiiiempyemapatientsobservationalsinglecentercohortstudyof719consecutivepatients AT mantovanisara whichsurgeryforstageiiiiiempyemapatientsobservationalsinglecentercohortstudyof719consecutivepatients AT treggiaristefano whichsurgeryforstageiiiiiempyemapatientsobservationalsinglecentercohortstudyof719consecutivepatients AT tritapepeluigi whichsurgeryforstageiiiiiempyemapatientsobservationalsinglecentercohortstudyof719consecutivepatients AT cardillogiuseppe whichsurgeryforstageiiiiiempyemapatientsobservationalsinglecentercohortstudyof719consecutivepatients |