Cargando…

Tunneling of Mesh during Ventral Rectopexy: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Functional Results

Avoiding the extensive damage of pelvic structures during ventral rectopexy could minimize secondary disfunctions. The objective of our observational study is to assess the safety and functional efficacy of a modified ventral rectopexy. In the modified ventral rectopexy, a retroperitoneal tunnel was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campennì, Paola, Marra, Angelo Alessandro, De Simone, Veronica, Litta, Francesco, Parello, Angelo, Ratto, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010294
_version_ 1784865728876249088
author Campennì, Paola
Marra, Angelo Alessandro
De Simone, Veronica
Litta, Francesco
Parello, Angelo
Ratto, Carlo
author_facet Campennì, Paola
Marra, Angelo Alessandro
De Simone, Veronica
Litta, Francesco
Parello, Angelo
Ratto, Carlo
author_sort Campennì, Paola
collection PubMed
description Avoiding the extensive damage of pelvic structures during ventral rectopexy could minimize secondary disfunctions. The objective of our observational study is to assess the safety and functional efficacy of a modified ventral rectopexy. In the modified ventral rectopexy, a retroperitoneal tunnel was created along the right side of rectum, connecting two peritoneal mini-incisions at the Douglas pouch and sacral promontory. The proximal edge of a polypropylene mesh, sutured over the ventral rectum, was pulled up through the retroperitoneal tunnel and fixed to the sacral promontory. In all patients, radiopaque clips were placed on the mesh, making it radiographically “visible”. Before surgery and at follow up visits, Altomare, Longo, CCSS, PAC-SYM, and CCFI scores were collected. From March 2010 to September 2021, 117 patients underwent VR. Modified ventral rectopexy was performed in 65 patients, while the standard ventral rectopexy was performed in 52 patients. The open approach was used in 97 cases (55 and 42 patients in modified and standard VR, respectively), while MI surgery was used in 20 cases (10 and 10 patients in modified and standard VR, respectively). A slightly shorter operative time and hospital stay were observed following modified ventral rectopexy (though this was not statistically significant). Similar overall complication rates were registered in the modified vs. standard ventral rectopexies (4.6% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.779). At follow-up, the Longo score (14.0 ± 8.6 vs. 11.0 ± 8.2, p = 0.042) and “delta” values of Altomare (9.2 ± 6.1 vs. 5.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.008) and CCSS (8.4 ± 6.3 vs. 6.1 ± 6.1, p = 0.037) scores were significantly improved in the modified ventral rectopexy group. A similar occurrence of symptoms recurrence was diagnosed in the two groups. Radiopaque clips helped to accurately diagnose mesh detachment/dislocation. The proposed modified VR seems to be feasible and safe. Marking the mesh intraoperatively seems useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9821569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98215692023-01-07 Tunneling of Mesh during Ventral Rectopexy: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Functional Results Campennì, Paola Marra, Angelo Alessandro De Simone, Veronica Litta, Francesco Parello, Angelo Ratto, Carlo J Clin Med Article Avoiding the extensive damage of pelvic structures during ventral rectopexy could minimize secondary disfunctions. The objective of our observational study is to assess the safety and functional efficacy of a modified ventral rectopexy. In the modified ventral rectopexy, a retroperitoneal tunnel was created along the right side of rectum, connecting two peritoneal mini-incisions at the Douglas pouch and sacral promontory. The proximal edge of a polypropylene mesh, sutured over the ventral rectum, was pulled up through the retroperitoneal tunnel and fixed to the sacral promontory. In all patients, radiopaque clips were placed on the mesh, making it radiographically “visible”. Before surgery and at follow up visits, Altomare, Longo, CCSS, PAC-SYM, and CCFI scores were collected. From March 2010 to September 2021, 117 patients underwent VR. Modified ventral rectopexy was performed in 65 patients, while the standard ventral rectopexy was performed in 52 patients. The open approach was used in 97 cases (55 and 42 patients in modified and standard VR, respectively), while MI surgery was used in 20 cases (10 and 10 patients in modified and standard VR, respectively). A slightly shorter operative time and hospital stay were observed following modified ventral rectopexy (though this was not statistically significant). Similar overall complication rates were registered in the modified vs. standard ventral rectopexies (4.6% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.779). At follow-up, the Longo score (14.0 ± 8.6 vs. 11.0 ± 8.2, p = 0.042) and “delta” values of Altomare (9.2 ± 6.1 vs. 5.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.008) and CCSS (8.4 ± 6.3 vs. 6.1 ± 6.1, p = 0.037) scores were significantly improved in the modified ventral rectopexy group. A similar occurrence of symptoms recurrence was diagnosed in the two groups. Radiopaque clips helped to accurately diagnose mesh detachment/dislocation. The proposed modified VR seems to be feasible and safe. Marking the mesh intraoperatively seems useful. MDPI 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9821569/ /pubmed/36615094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010294 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Campennì, Paola
Marra, Angelo Alessandro
De Simone, Veronica
Litta, Francesco
Parello, Angelo
Ratto, Carlo
Tunneling of Mesh during Ventral Rectopexy: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Functional Results
title Tunneling of Mesh during Ventral Rectopexy: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Functional Results
title_full Tunneling of Mesh during Ventral Rectopexy: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Functional Results
title_fullStr Tunneling of Mesh during Ventral Rectopexy: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Functional Results
title_full_unstemmed Tunneling of Mesh during Ventral Rectopexy: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Functional Results
title_short Tunneling of Mesh during Ventral Rectopexy: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Functional Results
title_sort tunneling of mesh during ventral rectopexy: technical aspects and long-term functional results
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9821569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010294
work_keys_str_mv AT campennipaola tunnelingofmeshduringventralrectopexytechnicalaspectsandlongtermfunctionalresults
AT marraangeloalessandro tunnelingofmeshduringventralrectopexytechnicalaspectsandlongtermfunctionalresults
AT desimoneveronica tunnelingofmeshduringventralrectopexytechnicalaspectsandlongtermfunctionalresults
AT littafrancesco tunnelingofmeshduringventralrectopexytechnicalaspectsandlongtermfunctionalresults
AT parelloangelo tunnelingofmeshduringventralrectopexytechnicalaspectsandlongtermfunctionalresults
AT rattocarlo tunnelingofmeshduringventralrectopexytechnicalaspectsandlongtermfunctionalresults