Cargando…

Modeling Analysis of a Polygeneration Plant Using a CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) Chemical Looping

In the current context of complexity between climate change, environmental sustainability, resource scarcity, and geopolitical aspects of energy resources, a polygenerative system with a circular approach is considered to generate energy (thermal, electrical, and fuel), contributing to the control o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magnolia, Greta, Santarelli, Massimo, Ferrero, Domenico, Papurello, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9822425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16010315
_version_ 1784865942940942336
author Magnolia, Greta
Santarelli, Massimo
Ferrero, Domenico
Papurello, Davide
author_facet Magnolia, Greta
Santarelli, Massimo
Ferrero, Domenico
Papurello, Davide
author_sort Magnolia, Greta
collection PubMed
description In the current context of complexity between climate change, environmental sustainability, resource scarcity, and geopolitical aspects of energy resources, a polygenerative system with a circular approach is considered to generate energy (thermal, electrical, and fuel), contributing to the control of CO(2) emissions. A plant for the multiple productions of electrical energy, thermal heat, DME, syngas, and methanol is discussed and analyzed, integrating a chemical cycle for CO(2)/H(2)O splitting driven using concentrated solar energy and biomethane. Two-stage chemical looping is the central part of the plant, operating with the CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) redox couple and operating at 1.2 bar and 900 °C. The system is coupled to biomethane reforming. The chemical loop generates fuel for the plant’s secondary units: a DME synthesis and distillation unit and a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). The DME synthesis and distillation unit are integrated with a biomethane reforming reactor powered by concentrated solar energy to produce syngas at 800 °C. The technical feasibility in terms of performance is presented in this paper, both with and without solar irradiation, with the following results, respectively: overall efficiencies of 62.56% and 59.08%, electricity production of 6.17 MWe and 28.96 MWe, and heat production of 111.97 MWt and 35.82 MWt. The fuel production, which occurs only at high irradiance, is 0.71 kg/s methanol, 6.18 kg/s DME, and 19.68 kg/s for the syngas. The increase in plant productivity is studied by decoupling the operation of the chemical looping with a biomethane reformer from intermittent solar energy using the heat from the SOFC unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9822425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98224252023-01-07 Modeling Analysis of a Polygeneration Plant Using a CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) Chemical Looping Magnolia, Greta Santarelli, Massimo Ferrero, Domenico Papurello, Davide Materials (Basel) Article In the current context of complexity between climate change, environmental sustainability, resource scarcity, and geopolitical aspects of energy resources, a polygenerative system with a circular approach is considered to generate energy (thermal, electrical, and fuel), contributing to the control of CO(2) emissions. A plant for the multiple productions of electrical energy, thermal heat, DME, syngas, and methanol is discussed and analyzed, integrating a chemical cycle for CO(2)/H(2)O splitting driven using concentrated solar energy and biomethane. Two-stage chemical looping is the central part of the plant, operating with the CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) redox couple and operating at 1.2 bar and 900 °C. The system is coupled to biomethane reforming. The chemical loop generates fuel for the plant’s secondary units: a DME synthesis and distillation unit and a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). The DME synthesis and distillation unit are integrated with a biomethane reforming reactor powered by concentrated solar energy to produce syngas at 800 °C. The technical feasibility in terms of performance is presented in this paper, both with and without solar irradiation, with the following results, respectively: overall efficiencies of 62.56% and 59.08%, electricity production of 6.17 MWe and 28.96 MWe, and heat production of 111.97 MWt and 35.82 MWt. The fuel production, which occurs only at high irradiance, is 0.71 kg/s methanol, 6.18 kg/s DME, and 19.68 kg/s for the syngas. The increase in plant productivity is studied by decoupling the operation of the chemical looping with a biomethane reformer from intermittent solar energy using the heat from the SOFC unit. MDPI 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9822425/ /pubmed/36614653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16010315 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Magnolia, Greta
Santarelli, Massimo
Ferrero, Domenico
Papurello, Davide
Modeling Analysis of a Polygeneration Plant Using a CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) Chemical Looping
title Modeling Analysis of a Polygeneration Plant Using a CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) Chemical Looping
title_full Modeling Analysis of a Polygeneration Plant Using a CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) Chemical Looping
title_fullStr Modeling Analysis of a Polygeneration Plant Using a CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) Chemical Looping
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Analysis of a Polygeneration Plant Using a CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) Chemical Looping
title_short Modeling Analysis of a Polygeneration Plant Using a CeO(2)/Ce(2)O(3) Chemical Looping
title_sort modeling analysis of a polygeneration plant using a ceo(2)/ce(2)o(3) chemical looping
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9822425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16010315
work_keys_str_mv AT magnoliagreta modelinganalysisofapolygenerationplantusingaceo2ce2o3chemicallooping
AT santarellimassimo modelinganalysisofapolygenerationplantusingaceo2ce2o3chemicallooping
AT ferrerodomenico modelinganalysisofapolygenerationplantusingaceo2ce2o3chemicallooping
AT papurellodavide modelinganalysisofapolygenerationplantusingaceo2ce2o3chemicallooping