Cargando…

Evaluation and Improvement of the Current CRCP Pavement Design Method

Continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) is a representative type of concrete pavement constructed with continuous steel bars without intermediate transverse expansions. With reference to pavement conditions, CRCP is an exceptional type of concrete pavement according to the Highway Pavement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moharekpour, Milad, Liu, Pengfei, Oeser, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9822430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16010358
_version_ 1784865944164630528
author Moharekpour, Milad
Liu, Pengfei
Oeser, Markus
author_facet Moharekpour, Milad
Liu, Pengfei
Oeser, Markus
author_sort Moharekpour, Milad
collection PubMed
description Continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) is a representative type of concrete pavement constructed with continuous steel bars without intermediate transverse expansions. With reference to pavement conditions, CRCP is an exceptional type of concrete pavement according to the Highway Pavement Condition Index (HPCI) and International Roughness Index (IRI). The two main design methods for CRCP are AASHTO 86/93 and the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). Because of limitations of the AASHTO 86/93 design method, the MEPDG method is more reliable. While incorporating the interactions among geometrics, pavement structure layers, material properties, subgrade, traffic, and environmental conditions, and the prediction values according to the MEPDG method, it matched the measured results of crack spacing and crack width. The MEPDG punchout, crack width and spacing, and load transfer efficiency (LTE) models were evaluated, and results were compared with the test sections in three European countries consisting of different construction details, which were investigated and recorded between 2019 and 2021. In this sense, a calculation tool was developed to consider the influence of different parameters in design process. In addition, sensitivity analyses were executed for the development of punchout, considering various input parameters. The track surveying and the evaluation of the results indicated that the design process can be improved with consideration of some criteria such as crack formation time or adjustment of the correlation between crack width and crack spacing. Due to the very important function of erosion and resulting pumping in the deterioration of CRCP, it is advisable to include the influence of the base layer and the influence of different shoulder type and heavy traffic volume or effect of deflection in the calculations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9822430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98224302023-01-07 Evaluation and Improvement of the Current CRCP Pavement Design Method Moharekpour, Milad Liu, Pengfei Oeser, Markus Materials (Basel) Article Continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) is a representative type of concrete pavement constructed with continuous steel bars without intermediate transverse expansions. With reference to pavement conditions, CRCP is an exceptional type of concrete pavement according to the Highway Pavement Condition Index (HPCI) and International Roughness Index (IRI). The two main design methods for CRCP are AASHTO 86/93 and the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). Because of limitations of the AASHTO 86/93 design method, the MEPDG method is more reliable. While incorporating the interactions among geometrics, pavement structure layers, material properties, subgrade, traffic, and environmental conditions, and the prediction values according to the MEPDG method, it matched the measured results of crack spacing and crack width. The MEPDG punchout, crack width and spacing, and load transfer efficiency (LTE) models were evaluated, and results were compared with the test sections in three European countries consisting of different construction details, which were investigated and recorded between 2019 and 2021. In this sense, a calculation tool was developed to consider the influence of different parameters in design process. In addition, sensitivity analyses were executed for the development of punchout, considering various input parameters. The track surveying and the evaluation of the results indicated that the design process can be improved with consideration of some criteria such as crack formation time or adjustment of the correlation between crack width and crack spacing. Due to the very important function of erosion and resulting pumping in the deterioration of CRCP, it is advisable to include the influence of the base layer and the influence of different shoulder type and heavy traffic volume or effect of deflection in the calculations. MDPI 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9822430/ /pubmed/36614697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16010358 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moharekpour, Milad
Liu, Pengfei
Oeser, Markus
Evaluation and Improvement of the Current CRCP Pavement Design Method
title Evaluation and Improvement of the Current CRCP Pavement Design Method
title_full Evaluation and Improvement of the Current CRCP Pavement Design Method
title_fullStr Evaluation and Improvement of the Current CRCP Pavement Design Method
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Improvement of the Current CRCP Pavement Design Method
title_short Evaluation and Improvement of the Current CRCP Pavement Design Method
title_sort evaluation and improvement of the current crcp pavement design method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9822430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36614697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16010358
work_keys_str_mv AT moharekpourmilad evaluationandimprovementofthecurrentcrcppavementdesignmethod
AT liupengfei evaluationandimprovementofthecurrentcrcppavementdesignmethod
AT oesermarkus evaluationandimprovementofthecurrentcrcppavementdesignmethod