Cargando…
Low-dose ionizing radiation and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Ionizing radiation is a human carcinogen, and there is evidence that exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation increases the risk of adverse birth outcomes. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the research of maternal and paternal exposure to low-dose r...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01911-2 |
_version_ | 1784866066826002432 |
---|---|
author | Frangione, Brianna Hinton, Patrick Villeneuve, Paul J. |
author_facet | Frangione, Brianna Hinton, Patrick Villeneuve, Paul J. |
author_sort | Frangione, Brianna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Ionizing radiation is a human carcinogen, and there is evidence that exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation increases the risk of adverse birth outcomes. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the research of maternal and paternal exposure to low-dose radiation on low birth weight, miscarriage, pre-term delivery, and stillbirth. Our literature search used four databases (PubMed, Environmental Index, GeoBASE, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature). We included study populations exposed to occupational and medical sources of radiation, nuclear disasters, and those living near nuclear power plants. We considered papers published between January 1st, 1990, and June 30th, 2021. The quality of the studies was assessed, and we performed meta-analysis using random effects models to generate summary measures of association. Forest plots were created to assess the heterogeneity in these measures, and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Overall, 26 studies were identified, and these yielded measures of association from 10, 11, and 8 studies for low birth weight, miscarriage, and stillbirth outcomes, respectively. It was not possible to perform meta-analyses for pre-term delivery due to a small number of studies. The meta-analysis summary relative risk (RR) of having a low-birth-weight infant among those ever exposed to radiation relative to those unexposed, after adjusting for publication bias, was 1.29 (95% CI 0.97–1.73). The corresponding risk estimates for miscarriage and stillbirth were 1.15 (95% CI 1.02–1.30), and 1.19 (95% CI 0.98–1.45), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ionizing radiation increases the risk of adverse birth outcomes. Future work should strive to provide data needed to better understand the shape of the exposure–response curve. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01911-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9823032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98230322023-01-08 Low-dose ionizing radiation and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Frangione, Brianna Hinton, Patrick Villeneuve, Paul J. Int Arch Occup Environ Health Review Article OBJECTIVE: Ionizing radiation is a human carcinogen, and there is evidence that exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation increases the risk of adverse birth outcomes. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the research of maternal and paternal exposure to low-dose radiation on low birth weight, miscarriage, pre-term delivery, and stillbirth. Our literature search used four databases (PubMed, Environmental Index, GeoBASE, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature). We included study populations exposed to occupational and medical sources of radiation, nuclear disasters, and those living near nuclear power plants. We considered papers published between January 1st, 1990, and June 30th, 2021. The quality of the studies was assessed, and we performed meta-analysis using random effects models to generate summary measures of association. Forest plots were created to assess the heterogeneity in these measures, and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Overall, 26 studies were identified, and these yielded measures of association from 10, 11, and 8 studies for low birth weight, miscarriage, and stillbirth outcomes, respectively. It was not possible to perform meta-analyses for pre-term delivery due to a small number of studies. The meta-analysis summary relative risk (RR) of having a low-birth-weight infant among those ever exposed to radiation relative to those unexposed, after adjusting for publication bias, was 1.29 (95% CI 0.97–1.73). The corresponding risk estimates for miscarriage and stillbirth were 1.15 (95% CI 1.02–1.30), and 1.19 (95% CI 0.98–1.45), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ionizing radiation increases the risk of adverse birth outcomes. Future work should strive to provide data needed to better understand the shape of the exposure–response curve. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01911-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9823032/ /pubmed/35913560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01911-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Frangione, Brianna Hinton, Patrick Villeneuve, Paul J. Low-dose ionizing radiation and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Low-dose ionizing radiation and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Low-dose ionizing radiation and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Low-dose ionizing radiation and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-dose ionizing radiation and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Low-dose ionizing radiation and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | low-dose ionizing radiation and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01911-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frangionebrianna lowdoseionizingradiationandadversebirthoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hintonpatrick lowdoseionizingradiationandadversebirthoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT villeneuvepaulj lowdoseionizingradiationandadversebirthoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |