Cargando…

A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women. Prehabilitation may offer improvements in physical and psychological wellbeing among participants prior to treatment. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of prehabilitation in participants diagnosed with breast canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toohey, Kellie, Hunter, Maddison, McKinnon, Karen, Casey, Tamara, Turner, Murray, Taylor, Suzanne, Paterson, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1
_version_ 1784866068093730816
author Toohey, Kellie
Hunter, Maddison
McKinnon, Karen
Casey, Tamara
Turner, Murray
Taylor, Suzanne
Paterson, Catherine
author_facet Toohey, Kellie
Hunter, Maddison
McKinnon, Karen
Casey, Tamara
Turner, Murray
Taylor, Suzanne
Paterson, Catherine
author_sort Toohey, Kellie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women. Prehabilitation may offer improvements in physical and psychological wellbeing among participants prior to treatment. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of prehabilitation in participants diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Studies exploring the impact of prehabilitation in participants with breast cancer were included. Studies were assessed independently according to pre-eligibility criteria, with data extraction and methodological quality assessed in parallel. RESULTS: 3184 records were identified according to our search criteria, and 14 articles were included. Articles comprised of quantitative randomised controlled trials (n = 7), quantitative non-randomised studies (n = 5), a qualitative study (n = 1), and a mixed-method study (n = 1). The majority of selected studies completed exercise programs (n = 4) or had exercise components (n = 2), with two focusing on upper-limb exercise. Five articles reported complementary and alternative therapies (n = 5). Two articles reported smoking cessation (n = 2), with a single study reporting multi-modal prehabilitation (n = 1). Mostly, prehabilitation improved outcomes including physical function, quality of life, and psychosocial variables (P < 0.05). The qualitative data identified preferences for multimodal prehabilitation, compared to unimodal with  an interest in receiving support for longer. CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation for patients with breast cancer is an emerging research area that appears to improve outcomes, however, ensuring that adequate intervention timeframes, follow-up, and population groups should be considered for future investigations. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The implementation of prehabilitation interventions for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer should be utilised by multidisciplinary teams to provide holistic care to patients as it has the potential to improve outcomes across the cancer care trajectory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9823038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98230382023-01-08 A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer Toohey, Kellie Hunter, Maddison McKinnon, Karen Casey, Tamara Turner, Murray Taylor, Suzanne Paterson, Catherine Breast Cancer Res Treat Review PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women. Prehabilitation may offer improvements in physical and psychological wellbeing among participants prior to treatment. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of prehabilitation in participants diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Studies exploring the impact of prehabilitation in participants with breast cancer were included. Studies were assessed independently according to pre-eligibility criteria, with data extraction and methodological quality assessed in parallel. RESULTS: 3184 records were identified according to our search criteria, and 14 articles were included. Articles comprised of quantitative randomised controlled trials (n = 7), quantitative non-randomised studies (n = 5), a qualitative study (n = 1), and a mixed-method study (n = 1). The majority of selected studies completed exercise programs (n = 4) or had exercise components (n = 2), with two focusing on upper-limb exercise. Five articles reported complementary and alternative therapies (n = 5). Two articles reported smoking cessation (n = 2), with a single study reporting multi-modal prehabilitation (n = 1). Mostly, prehabilitation improved outcomes including physical function, quality of life, and psychosocial variables (P < 0.05). The qualitative data identified preferences for multimodal prehabilitation, compared to unimodal with  an interest in receiving support for longer. CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation for patients with breast cancer is an emerging research area that appears to improve outcomes, however, ensuring that adequate intervention timeframes, follow-up, and population groups should be considered for future investigations. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The implementation of prehabilitation interventions for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer should be utilised by multidisciplinary teams to provide holistic care to patients as it has the potential to improve outcomes across the cancer care trajectory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1. Springer US 2022-10-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9823038/ /pubmed/36269525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Toohey, Kellie
Hunter, Maddison
McKinnon, Karen
Casey, Tamara
Turner, Murray
Taylor, Suzanne
Paterson, Catherine
A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer
title A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer
title_full A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer
title_fullStr A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer
title_short A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer
title_sort systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tooheykellie asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT huntermaddison asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT mckinnonkaren asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT caseytamara asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT turnermurray asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT taylorsuzanne asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT patersoncatherine asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT tooheykellie systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT huntermaddison systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT mckinnonkaren systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT caseytamara systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT turnermurray systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT taylorsuzanne systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer
AT patersoncatherine systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer