Cargando…
A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer
PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women. Prehabilitation may offer improvements in physical and psychological wellbeing among participants prior to treatment. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of prehabilitation in participants diagnosed with breast canc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1 |
_version_ | 1784866068093730816 |
---|---|
author | Toohey, Kellie Hunter, Maddison McKinnon, Karen Casey, Tamara Turner, Murray Taylor, Suzanne Paterson, Catherine |
author_facet | Toohey, Kellie Hunter, Maddison McKinnon, Karen Casey, Tamara Turner, Murray Taylor, Suzanne Paterson, Catherine |
author_sort | Toohey, Kellie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women. Prehabilitation may offer improvements in physical and psychological wellbeing among participants prior to treatment. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of prehabilitation in participants diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Studies exploring the impact of prehabilitation in participants with breast cancer were included. Studies were assessed independently according to pre-eligibility criteria, with data extraction and methodological quality assessed in parallel. RESULTS: 3184 records were identified according to our search criteria, and 14 articles were included. Articles comprised of quantitative randomised controlled trials (n = 7), quantitative non-randomised studies (n = 5), a qualitative study (n = 1), and a mixed-method study (n = 1). The majority of selected studies completed exercise programs (n = 4) or had exercise components (n = 2), with two focusing on upper-limb exercise. Five articles reported complementary and alternative therapies (n = 5). Two articles reported smoking cessation (n = 2), with a single study reporting multi-modal prehabilitation (n = 1). Mostly, prehabilitation improved outcomes including physical function, quality of life, and psychosocial variables (P < 0.05). The qualitative data identified preferences for multimodal prehabilitation, compared to unimodal with an interest in receiving support for longer. CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation for patients with breast cancer is an emerging research area that appears to improve outcomes, however, ensuring that adequate intervention timeframes, follow-up, and population groups should be considered for future investigations. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The implementation of prehabilitation interventions for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer should be utilised by multidisciplinary teams to provide holistic care to patients as it has the potential to improve outcomes across the cancer care trajectory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9823038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98230382023-01-08 A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer Toohey, Kellie Hunter, Maddison McKinnon, Karen Casey, Tamara Turner, Murray Taylor, Suzanne Paterson, Catherine Breast Cancer Res Treat Review PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women. Prehabilitation may offer improvements in physical and psychological wellbeing among participants prior to treatment. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of prehabilitation in participants diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Studies exploring the impact of prehabilitation in participants with breast cancer were included. Studies were assessed independently according to pre-eligibility criteria, with data extraction and methodological quality assessed in parallel. RESULTS: 3184 records were identified according to our search criteria, and 14 articles were included. Articles comprised of quantitative randomised controlled trials (n = 7), quantitative non-randomised studies (n = 5), a qualitative study (n = 1), and a mixed-method study (n = 1). The majority of selected studies completed exercise programs (n = 4) or had exercise components (n = 2), with two focusing on upper-limb exercise. Five articles reported complementary and alternative therapies (n = 5). Two articles reported smoking cessation (n = 2), with a single study reporting multi-modal prehabilitation (n = 1). Mostly, prehabilitation improved outcomes including physical function, quality of life, and psychosocial variables (P < 0.05). The qualitative data identified preferences for multimodal prehabilitation, compared to unimodal with an interest in receiving support for longer. CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation for patients with breast cancer is an emerging research area that appears to improve outcomes, however, ensuring that adequate intervention timeframes, follow-up, and population groups should be considered for future investigations. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The implementation of prehabilitation interventions for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer should be utilised by multidisciplinary teams to provide holistic care to patients as it has the potential to improve outcomes across the cancer care trajectory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1. Springer US 2022-10-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9823038/ /pubmed/36269525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Toohey, Kellie Hunter, Maddison McKinnon, Karen Casey, Tamara Turner, Murray Taylor, Suzanne Paterson, Catherine A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer |
title | A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer |
title_full | A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer |
title_short | A systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer |
title_sort | systematic review of multimodal prehabilitation in breast cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06759-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tooheykellie asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT huntermaddison asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT mckinnonkaren asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT caseytamara asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT turnermurray asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT taylorsuzanne asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT patersoncatherine asystematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT tooheykellie systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT huntermaddison systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT mckinnonkaren systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT caseytamara systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT turnermurray systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT taylorsuzanne systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer AT patersoncatherine systematicreviewofmultimodalprehabilitationinbreastcancer |