Cargando…

The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens

Antiestrogens (AEs) are used to treat all stages of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen have tissue-specific partial agonist activity, while selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as fulvestrant (ICI182,780) display a more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vallet, Amandine, El Ezzy, Mohamed, Diennet, Marine, Haidar, Salwa, Bouvier, Michel, Mader, Sylvie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102757
_version_ 1784866088336490496
author Vallet, Amandine
El Ezzy, Mohamed
Diennet, Marine
Haidar, Salwa
Bouvier, Michel
Mader, Sylvie
author_facet Vallet, Amandine
El Ezzy, Mohamed
Diennet, Marine
Haidar, Salwa
Bouvier, Michel
Mader, Sylvie
author_sort Vallet, Amandine
collection PubMed
description Antiestrogens (AEs) are used to treat all stages of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen have tissue-specific partial agonist activity, while selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as fulvestrant (ICI182,780) display a more complete antiestrogenic profile. We have previously observed that fulvestrant-induced ERα SUMOylation contributes to transcriptional suppression, but whether this effect is seen with other AEs and is specific to ERα is unclear. Here we show that several AEs induce SUMOylation of ERα, but not ERβ, at different levels. Swapping domains between ERα and ERβ indicates that the ERα identity of the ligand-binding domain helices 3 and 4 (H3-H4 region), which contribute to the static part of the activation function-2 (AF-2) cofactor binding groove, is sufficient to confer fulvestrant-induced SUMOylation to ERβ. This region does not contain lysine residues unique to ERα, suggesting that ERα-specific residues in H3-H4 determine the capacity of the AE-bound ERα ligand-binding domain to recruit the SUMOylation machinery. We also show that the SUMO E3 ligase protein inhibitor of activated STAT 1 increases SUMOylation of ERα and of ERβ containing the H3-H4 region of ERα, but not of ERβ. Together, these results shed new light on the molecular basis for the differential capacity of selective estrogen receptor modulators and selective estrogen receptor downregulators to suppress transcription by ERα.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9823126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98231262023-01-09 The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens Vallet, Amandine El Ezzy, Mohamed Diennet, Marine Haidar, Salwa Bouvier, Michel Mader, Sylvie J Biol Chem Research Article Antiestrogens (AEs) are used to treat all stages of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen have tissue-specific partial agonist activity, while selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as fulvestrant (ICI182,780) display a more complete antiestrogenic profile. We have previously observed that fulvestrant-induced ERα SUMOylation contributes to transcriptional suppression, but whether this effect is seen with other AEs and is specific to ERα is unclear. Here we show that several AEs induce SUMOylation of ERα, but not ERβ, at different levels. Swapping domains between ERα and ERβ indicates that the ERα identity of the ligand-binding domain helices 3 and 4 (H3-H4 region), which contribute to the static part of the activation function-2 (AF-2) cofactor binding groove, is sufficient to confer fulvestrant-induced SUMOylation to ERβ. This region does not contain lysine residues unique to ERα, suggesting that ERα-specific residues in H3-H4 determine the capacity of the AE-bound ERα ligand-binding domain to recruit the SUMOylation machinery. We also show that the SUMO E3 ligase protein inhibitor of activated STAT 1 increases SUMOylation of ERα and of ERβ containing the H3-H4 region of ERα, but not of ERβ. Together, these results shed new light on the molecular basis for the differential capacity of selective estrogen receptor modulators and selective estrogen receptor downregulators to suppress transcription by ERα. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9823126/ /pubmed/36460099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102757 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Vallet, Amandine
El Ezzy, Mohamed
Diennet, Marine
Haidar, Salwa
Bouvier, Michel
Mader, Sylvie
The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens
title The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens
title_full The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens
title_fullStr The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens
title_full_unstemmed The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens
title_short The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens
title_sort af-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective sumoylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102757
work_keys_str_mv AT valletamandine theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT elezzymohamed theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT diennetmarine theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT haidarsalwa theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT bouviermichel theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT madersylvie theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT valletamandine af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT elezzymohamed af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT diennetmarine af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT haidarsalwa af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT bouviermichel af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens
AT madersylvie af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens