Cargando…
The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens
Antiestrogens (AEs) are used to treat all stages of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen have tissue-specific partial agonist activity, while selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as fulvestrant (ICI182,780) display a more...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102757 |
_version_ | 1784866088336490496 |
---|---|
author | Vallet, Amandine El Ezzy, Mohamed Diennet, Marine Haidar, Salwa Bouvier, Michel Mader, Sylvie |
author_facet | Vallet, Amandine El Ezzy, Mohamed Diennet, Marine Haidar, Salwa Bouvier, Michel Mader, Sylvie |
author_sort | Vallet, Amandine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antiestrogens (AEs) are used to treat all stages of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen have tissue-specific partial agonist activity, while selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as fulvestrant (ICI182,780) display a more complete antiestrogenic profile. We have previously observed that fulvestrant-induced ERα SUMOylation contributes to transcriptional suppression, but whether this effect is seen with other AEs and is specific to ERα is unclear. Here we show that several AEs induce SUMOylation of ERα, but not ERβ, at different levels. Swapping domains between ERα and ERβ indicates that the ERα identity of the ligand-binding domain helices 3 and 4 (H3-H4 region), which contribute to the static part of the activation function-2 (AF-2) cofactor binding groove, is sufficient to confer fulvestrant-induced SUMOylation to ERβ. This region does not contain lysine residues unique to ERα, suggesting that ERα-specific residues in H3-H4 determine the capacity of the AE-bound ERα ligand-binding domain to recruit the SUMOylation machinery. We also show that the SUMO E3 ligase protein inhibitor of activated STAT 1 increases SUMOylation of ERα and of ERβ containing the H3-H4 region of ERα, but not of ERβ. Together, these results shed new light on the molecular basis for the differential capacity of selective estrogen receptor modulators and selective estrogen receptor downregulators to suppress transcription by ERα. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9823126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98231262023-01-09 The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens Vallet, Amandine El Ezzy, Mohamed Diennet, Marine Haidar, Salwa Bouvier, Michel Mader, Sylvie J Biol Chem Research Article Antiestrogens (AEs) are used to treat all stages of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen have tissue-specific partial agonist activity, while selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as fulvestrant (ICI182,780) display a more complete antiestrogenic profile. We have previously observed that fulvestrant-induced ERα SUMOylation contributes to transcriptional suppression, but whether this effect is seen with other AEs and is specific to ERα is unclear. Here we show that several AEs induce SUMOylation of ERα, but not ERβ, at different levels. Swapping domains between ERα and ERβ indicates that the ERα identity of the ligand-binding domain helices 3 and 4 (H3-H4 region), which contribute to the static part of the activation function-2 (AF-2) cofactor binding groove, is sufficient to confer fulvestrant-induced SUMOylation to ERβ. This region does not contain lysine residues unique to ERα, suggesting that ERα-specific residues in H3-H4 determine the capacity of the AE-bound ERα ligand-binding domain to recruit the SUMOylation machinery. We also show that the SUMO E3 ligase protein inhibitor of activated STAT 1 increases SUMOylation of ERα and of ERβ containing the H3-H4 region of ERα, but not of ERβ. Together, these results shed new light on the molecular basis for the differential capacity of selective estrogen receptor modulators and selective estrogen receptor downregulators to suppress transcription by ERα. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9823126/ /pubmed/36460099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102757 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vallet, Amandine El Ezzy, Mohamed Diennet, Marine Haidar, Salwa Bouvier, Michel Mader, Sylvie The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens |
title | The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens |
title_full | The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens |
title_fullStr | The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens |
title_full_unstemmed | The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens |
title_short | The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens |
title_sort | af-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective sumoylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102757 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valletamandine theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT elezzymohamed theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT diennetmarine theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT haidarsalwa theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT bouviermichel theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT madersylvie theaf2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT valletamandine af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT elezzymohamed af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT diennetmarine af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT haidarsalwa af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT bouviermichel af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens AT madersylvie af2cofactorbindingregioniskeyfortheselectivesumoylationofestrogenreceptoralphabyantiestrogens |