Cargando…
Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography
The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the differences in corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FLEx surgery using an acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography system (ARF-OCE) and to analyze the effect of the corneal cap on the integrity of corneal biomechanical proper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010181 |
_version_ | 1784866136724078592 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Yanzhi Zhu, Yirui Wang, Yongbo Yang, Hongwei He, Xingdao Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas Gomez Li, Yingjie Huang, Guofu |
author_facet | Zhao, Yanzhi Zhu, Yirui Wang, Yongbo Yang, Hongwei He, Xingdao Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas Gomez Li, Yingjie Huang, Guofu |
author_sort | Zhao, Yanzhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the differences in corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FLEx surgery using an acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography system (ARF-OCE) and to analyze the effect of the corneal cap on the integrity of corneal biomechanical properties. A custom ring array ultrasound transducer is used to excite corneal tissue to produce Lamb waves. Depth-resolved elastic modulus images of the in vivo cornea after refractive surgery were obtained based on the phase velocity of the Lamb wave. After refractive surgery, the average elastic modulus of the corneal flap decreased (71.7 ± 24.6 kPa), while the elastic modulus of the corneal cap increased (219.5 ± 54.9 kPa). The average elastic modulus of residual stromal bed (RSB) was increased after surgery, and the value after FLEx (305.8 ± 48.5 kPa) was significantly higher than that of SMILE (221.3 ± 43.2 kPa). Compared with FLEx, SMILE preserved most of the anterior stroma with less change in corneal biomechanics, which indicated that SMILE has an advantage in preserving the integrity of the corneal biomechanical properties. Therefore, the biomechanical properties of the cornea obtained by the ARF-OCE system may be one of the essential indicators for evaluating the safety of refractive surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9823345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98233452023-01-08 Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography Zhao, Yanzhi Zhu, Yirui Wang, Yongbo Yang, Hongwei He, Xingdao Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas Gomez Li, Yingjie Huang, Guofu Sensors (Basel) Article The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the differences in corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FLEx surgery using an acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography system (ARF-OCE) and to analyze the effect of the corneal cap on the integrity of corneal biomechanical properties. A custom ring array ultrasound transducer is used to excite corneal tissue to produce Lamb waves. Depth-resolved elastic modulus images of the in vivo cornea after refractive surgery were obtained based on the phase velocity of the Lamb wave. After refractive surgery, the average elastic modulus of the corneal flap decreased (71.7 ± 24.6 kPa), while the elastic modulus of the corneal cap increased (219.5 ± 54.9 kPa). The average elastic modulus of residual stromal bed (RSB) was increased after surgery, and the value after FLEx (305.8 ± 48.5 kPa) was significantly higher than that of SMILE (221.3 ± 43.2 kPa). Compared with FLEx, SMILE preserved most of the anterior stroma with less change in corneal biomechanics, which indicated that SMILE has an advantage in preserving the integrity of the corneal biomechanical properties. Therefore, the biomechanical properties of the cornea obtained by the ARF-OCE system may be one of the essential indicators for evaluating the safety of refractive surgery. MDPI 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9823345/ /pubmed/36616779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010181 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhao, Yanzhi Zhu, Yirui Wang, Yongbo Yang, Hongwei He, Xingdao Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas Gomez Li, Yingjie Huang, Guofu Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography |
title | Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography |
title_full | Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography |
title_short | Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography |
title_sort | quantitative evaluation of in vivo corneal biomechanical properties after smile and flex surgery by acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoyanzhi quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography AT zhuyirui quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography AT wangyongbo quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography AT yanghongwei quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography AT hexingdao quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography AT alvarezarenastomasgomez quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography AT liyingjie quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography AT huangguofu quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography |