Cargando…

Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography

The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the differences in corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FLEx surgery using an acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography system (ARF-OCE) and to analyze the effect of the corneal cap on the integrity of corneal biomechanical proper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yanzhi, Zhu, Yirui, Wang, Yongbo, Yang, Hongwei, He, Xingdao, Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas Gomez, Li, Yingjie, Huang, Guofu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010181
_version_ 1784866136724078592
author Zhao, Yanzhi
Zhu, Yirui
Wang, Yongbo
Yang, Hongwei
He, Xingdao
Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas Gomez
Li, Yingjie
Huang, Guofu
author_facet Zhao, Yanzhi
Zhu, Yirui
Wang, Yongbo
Yang, Hongwei
He, Xingdao
Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas Gomez
Li, Yingjie
Huang, Guofu
author_sort Zhao, Yanzhi
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the differences in corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FLEx surgery using an acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography system (ARF-OCE) and to analyze the effect of the corneal cap on the integrity of corneal biomechanical properties. A custom ring array ultrasound transducer is used to excite corneal tissue to produce Lamb waves. Depth-resolved elastic modulus images of the in vivo cornea after refractive surgery were obtained based on the phase velocity of the Lamb wave. After refractive surgery, the average elastic modulus of the corneal flap decreased (71.7 ± 24.6 kPa), while the elastic modulus of the corneal cap increased (219.5 ± 54.9 kPa). The average elastic modulus of residual stromal bed (RSB) was increased after surgery, and the value after FLEx (305.8 ± 48.5 kPa) was significantly higher than that of SMILE (221.3 ± 43.2 kPa). Compared with FLEx, SMILE preserved most of the anterior stroma with less change in corneal biomechanics, which indicated that SMILE has an advantage in preserving the integrity of the corneal biomechanical properties. Therefore, the biomechanical properties of the cornea obtained by the ARF-OCE system may be one of the essential indicators for evaluating the safety of refractive surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9823345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98233452023-01-08 Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography Zhao, Yanzhi Zhu, Yirui Wang, Yongbo Yang, Hongwei He, Xingdao Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas Gomez Li, Yingjie Huang, Guofu Sensors (Basel) Article The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the differences in corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FLEx surgery using an acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography system (ARF-OCE) and to analyze the effect of the corneal cap on the integrity of corneal biomechanical properties. A custom ring array ultrasound transducer is used to excite corneal tissue to produce Lamb waves. Depth-resolved elastic modulus images of the in vivo cornea after refractive surgery were obtained based on the phase velocity of the Lamb wave. After refractive surgery, the average elastic modulus of the corneal flap decreased (71.7 ± 24.6 kPa), while the elastic modulus of the corneal cap increased (219.5 ± 54.9 kPa). The average elastic modulus of residual stromal bed (RSB) was increased after surgery, and the value after FLEx (305.8 ± 48.5 kPa) was significantly higher than that of SMILE (221.3 ± 43.2 kPa). Compared with FLEx, SMILE preserved most of the anterior stroma with less change in corneal biomechanics, which indicated that SMILE has an advantage in preserving the integrity of the corneal biomechanical properties. Therefore, the biomechanical properties of the cornea obtained by the ARF-OCE system may be one of the essential indicators for evaluating the safety of refractive surgery. MDPI 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9823345/ /pubmed/36616779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010181 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhao, Yanzhi
Zhu, Yirui
Wang, Yongbo
Yang, Hongwei
He, Xingdao
Alvarez-Arenas, Tomas Gomez
Li, Yingjie
Huang, Guofu
Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography
title Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography
title_full Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography
title_fullStr Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography
title_short Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography
title_sort quantitative evaluation of in vivo corneal biomechanical properties after smile and flex surgery by acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010181
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyanzhi quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography
AT zhuyirui quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography
AT wangyongbo quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography
AT yanghongwei quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography
AT hexingdao quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography
AT alvarezarenastomasgomez quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography
AT liyingjie quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography
AT huangguofu quantitativeevaluationofinvivocornealbiomechanicalpropertiesaftersmileandflexsurgerybyacousticradiationforceopticalcoherenceelastography