Cargando…

Fundamentals of Plant Morphology and Plant Evo-Devo (Evolutionary Developmental Morphology)

Morphological concepts are used in plant evo-devo (evolutionary developmental biology) and other disciplines of plant biology, and therefore plant morphology is relevant to all of these disciplines. Many plant biologists still rely on classical morphology, according to which there are only three mut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sattler, Rolf, Rutishauser, Rolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12010118
_version_ 1784866181442699264
author Sattler, Rolf
Rutishauser, Rolf
author_facet Sattler, Rolf
Rutishauser, Rolf
author_sort Sattler, Rolf
collection PubMed
description Morphological concepts are used in plant evo-devo (evolutionary developmental biology) and other disciplines of plant biology, and therefore plant morphology is relevant to all of these disciplines. Many plant biologists still rely on classical morphology, according to which there are only three mutually exclusive organ categories in vascular plants such as flowering plants: root, stem (caulome), and leaf (phyllome). Continuum morphology recognizes a continuum between these organ categories. Instead of Aristotelian identity and either/or logic, it is based on fuzzy logic, according to which membership in a category is a matter of degree. Hence, an organ in flowering plants may be a root, stem, or leaf to some degree. Homology then also becomes a matter of degree. Process morphology supersedes structure/process dualism. Hence, structures do not have processes, they are processes, which means they are process combinations. These process combinations may change during ontogeny and phylogeny. Although classical morphology on the one hand and continuum and process morphology on the other use different kinds of logic, they can be considered complementary and thus together they present a more inclusive picture of the diversity of plant form than any one of the three alone. However, continuum and process morphology are more comprehensive than classical morphology. Insights gained from continuum and process morphology can inspire research in plant morphology and plant evo-devo, especially MorphoEvoDevo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9823526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98235262023-01-08 Fundamentals of Plant Morphology and Plant Evo-Devo (Evolutionary Developmental Morphology) Sattler, Rolf Rutishauser, Rolf Plants (Basel) Essay Morphological concepts are used in plant evo-devo (evolutionary developmental biology) and other disciplines of plant biology, and therefore plant morphology is relevant to all of these disciplines. Many plant biologists still rely on classical morphology, according to which there are only three mutually exclusive organ categories in vascular plants such as flowering plants: root, stem (caulome), and leaf (phyllome). Continuum morphology recognizes a continuum between these organ categories. Instead of Aristotelian identity and either/or logic, it is based on fuzzy logic, according to which membership in a category is a matter of degree. Hence, an organ in flowering plants may be a root, stem, or leaf to some degree. Homology then also becomes a matter of degree. Process morphology supersedes structure/process dualism. Hence, structures do not have processes, they are processes, which means they are process combinations. These process combinations may change during ontogeny and phylogeny. Although classical morphology on the one hand and continuum and process morphology on the other use different kinds of logic, they can be considered complementary and thus together they present a more inclusive picture of the diversity of plant form than any one of the three alone. However, continuum and process morphology are more comprehensive than classical morphology. Insights gained from continuum and process morphology can inspire research in plant morphology and plant evo-devo, especially MorphoEvoDevo. MDPI 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9823526/ /pubmed/36616247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12010118 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Essay
Sattler, Rolf
Rutishauser, Rolf
Fundamentals of Plant Morphology and Plant Evo-Devo (Evolutionary Developmental Morphology)
title Fundamentals of Plant Morphology and Plant Evo-Devo (Evolutionary Developmental Morphology)
title_full Fundamentals of Plant Morphology and Plant Evo-Devo (Evolutionary Developmental Morphology)
title_fullStr Fundamentals of Plant Morphology and Plant Evo-Devo (Evolutionary Developmental Morphology)
title_full_unstemmed Fundamentals of Plant Morphology and Plant Evo-Devo (Evolutionary Developmental Morphology)
title_short Fundamentals of Plant Morphology and Plant Evo-Devo (Evolutionary Developmental Morphology)
title_sort fundamentals of plant morphology and plant evo-devo (evolutionary developmental morphology)
topic Essay
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12010118
work_keys_str_mv AT sattlerrolf fundamentalsofplantmorphologyandplantevodevoevolutionarydevelopmentalmorphology
AT rutishauserrolf fundamentalsofplantmorphologyandplantevodevoevolutionarydevelopmentalmorphology