Cargando…
Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Fusing Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformer
Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is an important decision basis for regional landslide hazard risk management, territorial spatial planning and landslide decision making. The current convolutional neural network (CNN)-based landslide susceptibility mapping models do not adequately take into ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010088 |
_version_ | 1784866223364767744 |
---|---|
author | Bao, Shuai Liu, Jiping Wang, Liang Konečný, Milan Che, Xianghong Xu, Shenghua Li, Pengpeng |
author_facet | Bao, Shuai Liu, Jiping Wang, Liang Konečný, Milan Che, Xianghong Xu, Shenghua Li, Pengpeng |
author_sort | Bao, Shuai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is an important decision basis for regional landslide hazard risk management, territorial spatial planning and landslide decision making. The current convolutional neural network (CNN)-based landslide susceptibility mapping models do not adequately take into account the spatial nature of texture features, and vision transformer (ViT)-based LSM models have high requirements for the amount of training data. In this study, we overcome the shortcomings of CNN and ViT by fusing these two deep learning models (bottleneck transformer network (BoTNet) and convolutional vision transformer network (ConViT)), and the fused model was used to predict the probability of landslide occurrence. First, we integrated historical landslide data and landslide evaluation factors and analysed whether there was covariance in the landslide evaluation factors. Then, the testing accuracy and generalisation ability of the CNN, ViT, BoTNet and ConViT models were compared and analysed. Finally, four landslide susceptibility mapping models were used to predict the probability of landslide occurrence in Pingwu County, Sichuan Province, China. Among them, BoTNet and ConViT had the highest accuracy, both at 87.78%, an improvement of 1.11% compared to a single model, while ConViT had the highest F1-socre at 87.64%, an improvement of 1.28% compared to a single model. The results indicate that the fusion model of CNN and ViT has better LSM performance than the single model. Meanwhile, the evaluation results of this study can be used as one of the basic tools for landslide hazard risk quantification and disaster prevention in Pingwu County. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9823694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98236942023-01-08 Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Fusing Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformer Bao, Shuai Liu, Jiping Wang, Liang Konečný, Milan Che, Xianghong Xu, Shenghua Li, Pengpeng Sensors (Basel) Article Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is an important decision basis for regional landslide hazard risk management, territorial spatial planning and landslide decision making. The current convolutional neural network (CNN)-based landslide susceptibility mapping models do not adequately take into account the spatial nature of texture features, and vision transformer (ViT)-based LSM models have high requirements for the amount of training data. In this study, we overcome the shortcomings of CNN and ViT by fusing these two deep learning models (bottleneck transformer network (BoTNet) and convolutional vision transformer network (ConViT)), and the fused model was used to predict the probability of landslide occurrence. First, we integrated historical landslide data and landslide evaluation factors and analysed whether there was covariance in the landslide evaluation factors. Then, the testing accuracy and generalisation ability of the CNN, ViT, BoTNet and ConViT models were compared and analysed. Finally, four landslide susceptibility mapping models were used to predict the probability of landslide occurrence in Pingwu County, Sichuan Province, China. Among them, BoTNet and ConViT had the highest accuracy, both at 87.78%, an improvement of 1.11% compared to a single model, while ConViT had the highest F1-socre at 87.64%, an improvement of 1.28% compared to a single model. The results indicate that the fusion model of CNN and ViT has better LSM performance than the single model. Meanwhile, the evaluation results of this study can be used as one of the basic tools for landslide hazard risk quantification and disaster prevention in Pingwu County. MDPI 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9823694/ /pubmed/36616685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010088 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bao, Shuai Liu, Jiping Wang, Liang Konečný, Milan Che, Xianghong Xu, Shenghua Li, Pengpeng Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Fusing Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformer |
title | Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Fusing Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformer |
title_full | Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Fusing Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformer |
title_fullStr | Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Fusing Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformer |
title_full_unstemmed | Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Fusing Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformer |
title_short | Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Fusing Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformer |
title_sort | landslide susceptibility mapping by fusing convolutional neural networks and vision transformer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baoshuai landslidesusceptibilitymappingbyfusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksandvisiontransformer AT liujiping landslidesusceptibilitymappingbyfusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksandvisiontransformer AT wangliang landslidesusceptibilitymappingbyfusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksandvisiontransformer AT konecnymilan landslidesusceptibilitymappingbyfusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksandvisiontransformer AT chexianghong landslidesusceptibilitymappingbyfusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksandvisiontransformer AT xushenghua landslidesusceptibilitymappingbyfusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksandvisiontransformer AT lipengpeng landslidesusceptibilitymappingbyfusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksandvisiontransformer |