Cargando…
An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography
Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is increasingly being used for high-resolution biological imaging at depth. Signal-to-noise ratios and resolution are the main factors that determine image quality. Various reconstruction algorithms have been proposed and applied to reduce noise and enhance resolution,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010510 |
_version_ | 1784866244189487104 |
---|---|
author | Huen, Isaac Zhang, Ruochong Bi, Renzhe Li, Xiuting Moothanchery, Mohesh Olivo, Malini |
author_facet | Huen, Isaac Zhang, Ruochong Bi, Renzhe Li, Xiuting Moothanchery, Mohesh Olivo, Malini |
author_sort | Huen, Isaac |
collection | PubMed |
description | Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is increasingly being used for high-resolution biological imaging at depth. Signal-to-noise ratios and resolution are the main factors that determine image quality. Various reconstruction algorithms have been proposed and applied to reduce noise and enhance resolution, but the efficacy of signal preprocessing methods which also affect image quality, are seldom discussed. We, therefore, compared common preprocessing techniques, namely bandpass filters, wavelet denoising, empirical mode decomposition, and singular value decomposition. Each was compared with and without accounting for sensor directivity. The denoising performance was evaluated with the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and the resolution was calculated as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in both the lateral and axial directions. In the phantom experiment, counting in directivity was found to significantly reduce noise, outperforming other methods. Irrespective of directivity, the best performing methods for denoising were bandpass, unfiltered, SVD, wavelet, and EMD, in that order. Only bandpass filtering consistently yielded improvements. Significant improvements in the lateral resolution were observed using directivity in two out of three acquisitions. This study investigated the advantages and disadvantages of different preprocessing methods and may help to determine better practices in PAT reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9823775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98237752023-01-08 An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography Huen, Isaac Zhang, Ruochong Bi, Renzhe Li, Xiuting Moothanchery, Mohesh Olivo, Malini Sensors (Basel) Article Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is increasingly being used for high-resolution biological imaging at depth. Signal-to-noise ratios and resolution are the main factors that determine image quality. Various reconstruction algorithms have been proposed and applied to reduce noise and enhance resolution, but the efficacy of signal preprocessing methods which also affect image quality, are seldom discussed. We, therefore, compared common preprocessing techniques, namely bandpass filters, wavelet denoising, empirical mode decomposition, and singular value decomposition. Each was compared with and without accounting for sensor directivity. The denoising performance was evaluated with the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and the resolution was calculated as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in both the lateral and axial directions. In the phantom experiment, counting in directivity was found to significantly reduce noise, outperforming other methods. Irrespective of directivity, the best performing methods for denoising were bandpass, unfiltered, SVD, wavelet, and EMD, in that order. Only bandpass filtering consistently yielded improvements. Significant improvements in the lateral resolution were observed using directivity in two out of three acquisitions. This study investigated the advantages and disadvantages of different preprocessing methods and may help to determine better practices in PAT reconstruction. MDPI 2023-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9823775/ /pubmed/36617107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010510 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Huen, Isaac Zhang, Ruochong Bi, Renzhe Li, Xiuting Moothanchery, Mohesh Olivo, Malini An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography |
title | An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography |
title_full | An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography |
title_fullStr | An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography |
title_short | An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography |
title_sort | investigation of signal preprocessing for photoacoustic tomography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huenisaac aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT zhangruochong aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT birenzhe aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT lixiuting aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT moothancherymohesh aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT olivomalini aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT huenisaac investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT zhangruochong investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT birenzhe investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT lixiuting investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT moothancherymohesh investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography AT olivomalini investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography |