Cargando…

An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography

Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is increasingly being used for high-resolution biological imaging at depth. Signal-to-noise ratios and resolution are the main factors that determine image quality. Various reconstruction algorithms have been proposed and applied to reduce noise and enhance resolution,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huen, Isaac, Zhang, Ruochong, Bi, Renzhe, Li, Xiuting, Moothanchery, Mohesh, Olivo, Malini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010510
_version_ 1784866244189487104
author Huen, Isaac
Zhang, Ruochong
Bi, Renzhe
Li, Xiuting
Moothanchery, Mohesh
Olivo, Malini
author_facet Huen, Isaac
Zhang, Ruochong
Bi, Renzhe
Li, Xiuting
Moothanchery, Mohesh
Olivo, Malini
author_sort Huen, Isaac
collection PubMed
description Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is increasingly being used for high-resolution biological imaging at depth. Signal-to-noise ratios and resolution are the main factors that determine image quality. Various reconstruction algorithms have been proposed and applied to reduce noise and enhance resolution, but the efficacy of signal preprocessing methods which also affect image quality, are seldom discussed. We, therefore, compared common preprocessing techniques, namely bandpass filters, wavelet denoising, empirical mode decomposition, and singular value decomposition. Each was compared with and without accounting for sensor directivity. The denoising performance was evaluated with the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and the resolution was calculated as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in both the lateral and axial directions. In the phantom experiment, counting in directivity was found to significantly reduce noise, outperforming other methods. Irrespective of directivity, the best performing methods for denoising were bandpass, unfiltered, SVD, wavelet, and EMD, in that order. Only bandpass filtering consistently yielded improvements. Significant improvements in the lateral resolution were observed using directivity in two out of three acquisitions. This study investigated the advantages and disadvantages of different preprocessing methods and may help to determine better practices in PAT reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9823775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98237752023-01-08 An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography Huen, Isaac Zhang, Ruochong Bi, Renzhe Li, Xiuting Moothanchery, Mohesh Olivo, Malini Sensors (Basel) Article Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is increasingly being used for high-resolution biological imaging at depth. Signal-to-noise ratios and resolution are the main factors that determine image quality. Various reconstruction algorithms have been proposed and applied to reduce noise and enhance resolution, but the efficacy of signal preprocessing methods which also affect image quality, are seldom discussed. We, therefore, compared common preprocessing techniques, namely bandpass filters, wavelet denoising, empirical mode decomposition, and singular value decomposition. Each was compared with and without accounting for sensor directivity. The denoising performance was evaluated with the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and the resolution was calculated as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in both the lateral and axial directions. In the phantom experiment, counting in directivity was found to significantly reduce noise, outperforming other methods. Irrespective of directivity, the best performing methods for denoising were bandpass, unfiltered, SVD, wavelet, and EMD, in that order. Only bandpass filtering consistently yielded improvements. Significant improvements in the lateral resolution were observed using directivity in two out of three acquisitions. This study investigated the advantages and disadvantages of different preprocessing methods and may help to determine better practices in PAT reconstruction. MDPI 2023-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9823775/ /pubmed/36617107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010510 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Huen, Isaac
Zhang, Ruochong
Bi, Renzhe
Li, Xiuting
Moothanchery, Mohesh
Olivo, Malini
An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography
title An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography
title_full An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography
title_fullStr An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography
title_full_unstemmed An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography
title_short An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography
title_sort investigation of signal preprocessing for photoacoustic tomography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010510
work_keys_str_mv AT huenisaac aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT zhangruochong aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT birenzhe aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT lixiuting aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT moothancherymohesh aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT olivomalini aninvestigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT huenisaac investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT zhangruochong investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT birenzhe investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT lixiuting investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT moothancherymohesh investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography
AT olivomalini investigationofsignalpreprocessingforphotoacoustictomography