Cargando…

Performance of Polydioxanone-Based Membrane in Association with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration

This study evaluated the bioactivity of 3D-printed β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds or hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds associated with polydioxanone (PDO) membrane (Plenum(®) Guide) for guided bone regeneration in rats. Fifty-four rats were divided into three groups (n = 18 animals): autogenou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitol-Palin, Letícia, Frigério, Paula Buzo, Moura, Juliana, Pilatti, Livia, de Oliveira, Letícia Marques Jordão, Matsubara, Elaine Yoshiko, Tunchel, Samy, Shibli, Jamil Awad, Blay, Alberto, Saska, Sybele, Okamoto, Roberta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15010031
_version_ 1784866277566709760
author Pitol-Palin, Letícia
Frigério, Paula Buzo
Moura, Juliana
Pilatti, Livia
de Oliveira, Letícia Marques Jordão
Matsubara, Elaine Yoshiko
Tunchel, Samy
Shibli, Jamil Awad
Blay, Alberto
Saska, Sybele
Okamoto, Roberta
author_facet Pitol-Palin, Letícia
Frigério, Paula Buzo
Moura, Juliana
Pilatti, Livia
de Oliveira, Letícia Marques Jordão
Matsubara, Elaine Yoshiko
Tunchel, Samy
Shibli, Jamil Awad
Blay, Alberto
Saska, Sybele
Okamoto, Roberta
author_sort Pitol-Palin, Letícia
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the bioactivity of 3D-printed β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds or hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds associated with polydioxanone (PDO) membrane (Plenum(®) Guide) for guided bone regeneration in rats. Fifty-four rats were divided into three groups (n = 18 animals): autogenous bone + PDO membrane (Auto/PG); 3D-printed β-TCP + PDO membrane (TCP/PG); and 3D-printed HA + PDO membrane (HA/PG). A surgical defect in the parietal bone was made and filled with the respective scaffolds and PDO membrane. The animals were euthanized 7, 30, and 60 days after the surgical procedure for micro-CT, histomorphometric, and immunolabeling analyses. Micro-CT showed an increase in trabecular thickness and a decrease in trabecular separation, even with similar bone volume percentages between TCP/PG and HA/PG vs. Auto/PG. Histometric analysis showed increased bone formation at 30 days in the groups compared to 7 days postoperatively. Immunolabeling analysis showed an increase in proteins related to bone formation at 30 days, and both groups showed a similar immunolabeling pattern. This study concludes that 3D-printed scaffolds associated with PDO membrane (Plenum(®) Guide) present similar results to autogenous bone for bone regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9823904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98239042023-01-08 Performance of Polydioxanone-Based Membrane in Association with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration Pitol-Palin, Letícia Frigério, Paula Buzo Moura, Juliana Pilatti, Livia de Oliveira, Letícia Marques Jordão Matsubara, Elaine Yoshiko Tunchel, Samy Shibli, Jamil Awad Blay, Alberto Saska, Sybele Okamoto, Roberta Polymers (Basel) Article This study evaluated the bioactivity of 3D-printed β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds or hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds associated with polydioxanone (PDO) membrane (Plenum(®) Guide) for guided bone regeneration in rats. Fifty-four rats were divided into three groups (n = 18 animals): autogenous bone + PDO membrane (Auto/PG); 3D-printed β-TCP + PDO membrane (TCP/PG); and 3D-printed HA + PDO membrane (HA/PG). A surgical defect in the parietal bone was made and filled with the respective scaffolds and PDO membrane. The animals were euthanized 7, 30, and 60 days after the surgical procedure for micro-CT, histomorphometric, and immunolabeling analyses. Micro-CT showed an increase in trabecular thickness and a decrease in trabecular separation, even with similar bone volume percentages between TCP/PG and HA/PG vs. Auto/PG. Histometric analysis showed increased bone formation at 30 days in the groups compared to 7 days postoperatively. Immunolabeling analysis showed an increase in proteins related to bone formation at 30 days, and both groups showed a similar immunolabeling pattern. This study concludes that 3D-printed scaffolds associated with PDO membrane (Plenum(®) Guide) present similar results to autogenous bone for bone regeneration. MDPI 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9823904/ /pubmed/36616379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15010031 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pitol-Palin, Letícia
Frigério, Paula Buzo
Moura, Juliana
Pilatti, Livia
de Oliveira, Letícia Marques Jordão
Matsubara, Elaine Yoshiko
Tunchel, Samy
Shibli, Jamil Awad
Blay, Alberto
Saska, Sybele
Okamoto, Roberta
Performance of Polydioxanone-Based Membrane in Association with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration
title Performance of Polydioxanone-Based Membrane in Association with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration
title_full Performance of Polydioxanone-Based Membrane in Association with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration
title_fullStr Performance of Polydioxanone-Based Membrane in Association with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Polydioxanone-Based Membrane in Association with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration
title_short Performance of Polydioxanone-Based Membrane in Association with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration
title_sort performance of polydioxanone-based membrane in association with 3d-printed bioceramic scaffolds in bone regeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36616379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15010031
work_keys_str_mv AT pitolpalinleticia performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT frigeriopaulabuzo performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT mourajuliana performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT pilattilivia performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT deoliveiraleticiamarquesjordao performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT matsubaraelaineyoshiko performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT tunchelsamy performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT shiblijamilawad performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT blayalberto performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT saskasybele performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration
AT okamotoroberta performanceofpolydioxanonebasedmembraneinassociationwith3dprintedbioceramicscaffoldsinboneregeneration