Cargando…
Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff
In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended a significant reduction in the lens-equivalent radiation dose limit, thus from an average of 150 to 20 mSv/year over 5 years. In recent years, the occupational dose has been rising with the increased sophistication o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010512 |
_version_ | 1784866291446710272 |
---|---|
author | Hattori, Kenshin Inaba, Yohei Kato, Toshiki Fujisawa, Masaki Yasuno, Hikaru Yamada, Ayumi Haga, Yoshihiro Suzuki, Masatoshi Zuguchi, Masayuki Chida, Koichi |
author_facet | Hattori, Kenshin Inaba, Yohei Kato, Toshiki Fujisawa, Masaki Yasuno, Hikaru Yamada, Ayumi Haga, Yoshihiro Suzuki, Masatoshi Zuguchi, Masayuki Chida, Koichi |
author_sort | Hattori, Kenshin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended a significant reduction in the lens-equivalent radiation dose limit, thus from an average of 150 to 20 mSv/year over 5 years. In recent years, the occupational dose has been rising with the increased sophistication of interventional radiology (IVR); management of IVR staff radiation doses has become more important, making real-time radiation monitoring of such staff desirable. Recently, the i3 real-time occupational exposure monitoring system (based on RaySafe(TM)) has replaced the conventional i2 system. Here, we compared the i2 and i3 systems in terms of sensitivity (batch uniformity), tube-voltage dependency, dose linearity, dose-rate dependency, and angle dependency. The sensitivity difference (batch uniformity) was approximately 5%, and the tube-voltage dependency was <±20% between 50 and 110 kV. Dose linearity was good (R(2) = 1.00); a slight dose-rate dependency (~20%) was evident at very high dose rates (250 mGy/h). The i3 dosimeter showed better performance for the lower radiation detection limit compared with the i2 system. The horizontal and vertical angle dependencies of i3 were superior to those of i2. Thus, i3 sensitivity was higher over a wider angle range compared with i2, aiding the measurement of scattered radiation. Unlike the i2 sensor, the influence of backscattered radiation (i.e., radiation from an angle of 180°) was negligible. Therefore, the i3 system may be more appropriate in areas affected by backscatter. In the future, i3 will facilitate real-time dosimetry and dose management during IVR and other applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9823962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98239622023-01-08 Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff Hattori, Kenshin Inaba, Yohei Kato, Toshiki Fujisawa, Masaki Yasuno, Hikaru Yamada, Ayumi Haga, Yoshihiro Suzuki, Masatoshi Zuguchi, Masayuki Chida, Koichi Sensors (Basel) Communication In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended a significant reduction in the lens-equivalent radiation dose limit, thus from an average of 150 to 20 mSv/year over 5 years. In recent years, the occupational dose has been rising with the increased sophistication of interventional radiology (IVR); management of IVR staff radiation doses has become more important, making real-time radiation monitoring of such staff desirable. Recently, the i3 real-time occupational exposure monitoring system (based on RaySafe(TM)) has replaced the conventional i2 system. Here, we compared the i2 and i3 systems in terms of sensitivity (batch uniformity), tube-voltage dependency, dose linearity, dose-rate dependency, and angle dependency. The sensitivity difference (batch uniformity) was approximately 5%, and the tube-voltage dependency was <±20% between 50 and 110 kV. Dose linearity was good (R(2) = 1.00); a slight dose-rate dependency (~20%) was evident at very high dose rates (250 mGy/h). The i3 dosimeter showed better performance for the lower radiation detection limit compared with the i2 system. The horizontal and vertical angle dependencies of i3 were superior to those of i2. Thus, i3 sensitivity was higher over a wider angle range compared with i2, aiding the measurement of scattered radiation. Unlike the i2 sensor, the influence of backscattered radiation (i.e., radiation from an angle of 180°) was negligible. Therefore, the i3 system may be more appropriate in areas affected by backscatter. In the future, i3 will facilitate real-time dosimetry and dose management during IVR and other applications. MDPI 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9823962/ /pubmed/36617110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010512 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Hattori, Kenshin Inaba, Yohei Kato, Toshiki Fujisawa, Masaki Yasuno, Hikaru Yamada, Ayumi Haga, Yoshihiro Suzuki, Masatoshi Zuguchi, Masayuki Chida, Koichi Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff |
title | Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff |
title_full | Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff |
title_short | Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff |
title_sort | evaluation of a new real-time dosimeter sensor for interventional radiology staff |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23010512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hattorikenshin evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff AT inabayohei evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff AT katotoshiki evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff AT fujisawamasaki evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff AT yasunohikaru evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff AT yamadaayumi evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff AT hagayoshihiro evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff AT suzukimasatoshi evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff AT zuguchimasayuki evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff AT chidakoichi evaluationofanewrealtimedosimetersensorforinterventionalradiologystaff |