Cargando…

Quantifying Nonadiabaticity in Major Families of Superconductors

The classical Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer and Eliashberg theories of the electron–phonon-mediated superconductivity are based on the Migdal theorem, which is an assumption that the energy of charge carriers, [Formula: see text] , significantly exceeds the phononic energy, [Formula: see text] , of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Talantsev, Evgueni F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9824585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615981
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13010071
_version_ 1784866446251130880
author Talantsev, Evgueni F.
author_facet Talantsev, Evgueni F.
author_sort Talantsev, Evgueni F.
collection PubMed
description The classical Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer and Eliashberg theories of the electron–phonon-mediated superconductivity are based on the Migdal theorem, which is an assumption that the energy of charge carriers, [Formula: see text] , significantly exceeds the phononic energy, [Formula: see text] , of the crystalline lattice. This assumption, which is also known as adiabatic approximation, implies that the superconductor exhibits fast charge carriers and slow phonons. This picture is valid for pure metals and metallic alloys because these superconductors exhibit [Formula: see text]. However, for n-type-doped semiconducting SrTiO(3), this adiabatic approximation is not valid, because this material exhibits [Formula: see text]. There is a growing number of newly discovered superconductors which are also beyond the adiabatic approximation. Here, leaving aside pure theoretical aspects of nonadiabatic superconductors, we classified major classes of superconductors (including, elements, A-15 and Heusler alloys, Laves phases, intermetallics, noncentrosymmetric compounds, cuprates, pnictides, highly-compressed hydrides, and two-dimensional superconductors) by the strength of nonadiabaticity (which we defined by the ratio of the Debye temperature to the Fermi temperature, [Formula: see text]). We found that the majority of analyzed superconductors fall into the [Formula: see text] band. Based on the analysis, we proposed the classification scheme for the strength of nonadiabatic effects in superconductors and discussed how this classification is linked with other known empirical taxonomies in superconductivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9824585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98245852023-01-08 Quantifying Nonadiabaticity in Major Families of Superconductors Talantsev, Evgueni F. Nanomaterials (Basel) Article The classical Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer and Eliashberg theories of the electron–phonon-mediated superconductivity are based on the Migdal theorem, which is an assumption that the energy of charge carriers, [Formula: see text] , significantly exceeds the phononic energy, [Formula: see text] , of the crystalline lattice. This assumption, which is also known as adiabatic approximation, implies that the superconductor exhibits fast charge carriers and slow phonons. This picture is valid for pure metals and metallic alloys because these superconductors exhibit [Formula: see text]. However, for n-type-doped semiconducting SrTiO(3), this adiabatic approximation is not valid, because this material exhibits [Formula: see text]. There is a growing number of newly discovered superconductors which are also beyond the adiabatic approximation. Here, leaving aside pure theoretical aspects of nonadiabatic superconductors, we classified major classes of superconductors (including, elements, A-15 and Heusler alloys, Laves phases, intermetallics, noncentrosymmetric compounds, cuprates, pnictides, highly-compressed hydrides, and two-dimensional superconductors) by the strength of nonadiabaticity (which we defined by the ratio of the Debye temperature to the Fermi temperature, [Formula: see text]). We found that the majority of analyzed superconductors fall into the [Formula: see text] band. Based on the analysis, we proposed the classification scheme for the strength of nonadiabatic effects in superconductors and discussed how this classification is linked with other known empirical taxonomies in superconductivity. MDPI 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9824585/ /pubmed/36615981 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13010071 Text en © 2022 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Talantsev, Evgueni F.
Quantifying Nonadiabaticity in Major Families of Superconductors
title Quantifying Nonadiabaticity in Major Families of Superconductors
title_full Quantifying Nonadiabaticity in Major Families of Superconductors
title_fullStr Quantifying Nonadiabaticity in Major Families of Superconductors
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Nonadiabaticity in Major Families of Superconductors
title_short Quantifying Nonadiabaticity in Major Families of Superconductors
title_sort quantifying nonadiabaticity in major families of superconductors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9824585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36615981
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13010071
work_keys_str_mv AT talantsevevguenif quantifyingnonadiabaticityinmajorfamiliesofsuperconductors