Cargando…

Value of preoperative ureteral wall thickness in prediction of impaction of ureteric stones stratified by size in laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of preoperative UWT in the prediction of impaction of ureteral stones stratified according to stone size in ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. PATIENT AND METHODS: This study included 154 patients submitted to URSL for ureteral stones. Radiological data comprised the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdrabuh, Abdrabuh M., El-Agamy, El-Sayed I., Elhelaly, Mohamed A., Abouelgreed, Tamer A., Abdel-Al, Ibrahim, Youssof, Hamada A., Elatreisy, Adel, Shalkamy, Osama, Elebiary, Mohamed, Agha, Mohammed, Tagreda, Ibrahim, Alrefaey, Ahmed, Elawadey, Elsayed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01168-4
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of preoperative UWT in the prediction of impaction of ureteral stones stratified according to stone size in ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. PATIENT AND METHODS: This study included 154 patients submitted to URSL for ureteral stones. Radiological data comprised the presence of hydronephrosis, anteroposterior pelvic diameter (PAPD), proximal ureteric diameter (PUD), and maximum UWT at the stone site. Collected stone characteristics were stone size, side, number, site, and density. RESULTS: The study included 154 patients subjected to URSL. They comprised 74 patients (48.1%) with impacted stones and 80 (51.9%) with non-impacted stones. Patients were stratified into those with stone size ≤ 10 mm and others with stone size > 10 mm. In the former group, we found that stone impaction was significantly associated with higher PAPD, PUD, and UWT. In patients with stone size > 10 mm, stone impaction was related to higher UWT, more stone number, and higher frequency of stones located in the lower ureter. ROC curve analysis revealed good power of UWT in discrimination of stone impaction in all patients [AUC (95% CI) 0.65 (0.55–0.74)] at a cut-off of 3.8 mm, in patients with stone size ≤ 10 mm [AUC (95% CI) 0.76 (0.61–0.91)] at a cut-off of 4.1 mm and in patients with stone size > 10 mm [AUC (95% CI) 0.72 (0.62–0.83)] at a cut-off of 3.0 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Stratifying ureteric stones according to size would render UWT a more practical and clinically-oriented approach for the preoperative prediction of stone impaction.