Cargando…

Utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low/middle-income setting

BACKGROUND: Determining lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) aetiology is complex. Culture-based methods are laborious with poor sensitivity. Molecular assays improve detection of potential pathogens, but incorrect interpretation of results may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Der Westhuyzen, M, Samodien, N, Brink, A J, Moodley, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36628341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlac139
_version_ 1784866596471177216
author Van Der Westhuyzen, M
Samodien, N
Brink, A J
Moodley, C
author_facet Van Der Westhuyzen, M
Samodien, N
Brink, A J
Moodley, C
author_sort Van Der Westhuyzen, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Determining lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) aetiology is complex. Culture-based methods are laborious with poor sensitivity. Molecular assays improve detection of potential pathogens, but incorrect interpretation of results may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: The utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus (FA-PP) to detect LRTI pathogens, and the potential impact on antimicrobial stewardship in a low-resource setting, were assessed. Routine LRT samples were included from adult patients with clinically suspected LRTI or with a concomitant blood culture at Groote Schuur Hospital and referring facilities. Culture and FA-PP results were compared, and pharmacy data analysed to determine appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: There was an 80% correlation between cultured LRTI pathogens and the FA-PP bin ≥10(7) results. Compared with culture, the FA-PP detected substantially more pathogens (86.6% versus 17.9%) and produced a combined 100% positive percent agreement, and 88% negative percent agreement. The FA-PP detected bacterial/viral coinfections in 27% of samples. Correlation of FA-PP results with pharmacy data (n = 69) indicated a potential antibiotic change in 75% of cases, but this is difficult to accurately characterize without a ‘gold standard’ for treatment or complete clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: The FA-PP increased the number of positive samples with typical bacteria, but the semi-quantitative reporting algorithm does not describe the correlation between the different bin values and colonization versus infection. This complicates result interpretation and may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial treatment. This study highlights the potential positive impact of rapid molecular assays for routine care in lower-income settings, but also underscores the interpretive challenges associated with these tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9825243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98252432023-01-09 Utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low/middle-income setting Van Der Westhuyzen, M Samodien, N Brink, A J Moodley, C JAC Antimicrob Resist Original Article BACKGROUND: Determining lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) aetiology is complex. Culture-based methods are laborious with poor sensitivity. Molecular assays improve detection of potential pathogens, but incorrect interpretation of results may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: The utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus (FA-PP) to detect LRTI pathogens, and the potential impact on antimicrobial stewardship in a low-resource setting, were assessed. Routine LRT samples were included from adult patients with clinically suspected LRTI or with a concomitant blood culture at Groote Schuur Hospital and referring facilities. Culture and FA-PP results were compared, and pharmacy data analysed to determine appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: There was an 80% correlation between cultured LRTI pathogens and the FA-PP bin ≥10(7) results. Compared with culture, the FA-PP detected substantially more pathogens (86.6% versus 17.9%) and produced a combined 100% positive percent agreement, and 88% negative percent agreement. The FA-PP detected bacterial/viral coinfections in 27% of samples. Correlation of FA-PP results with pharmacy data (n = 69) indicated a potential antibiotic change in 75% of cases, but this is difficult to accurately characterize without a ‘gold standard’ for treatment or complete clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: The FA-PP increased the number of positive samples with typical bacteria, but the semi-quantitative reporting algorithm does not describe the correlation between the different bin values and colonization versus infection. This complicates result interpretation and may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial treatment. This study highlights the potential positive impact of rapid molecular assays for routine care in lower-income settings, but also underscores the interpretive challenges associated with these tests. Oxford University Press 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9825243/ /pubmed/36628341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlac139 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Van Der Westhuyzen, M
Samodien, N
Brink, A J
Moodley, C
Utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low/middle-income setting
title Utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low/middle-income setting
title_full Utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low/middle-income setting
title_fullStr Utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low/middle-income setting
title_full_unstemmed Utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low/middle-income setting
title_short Utility of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low/middle-income setting
title_sort utility of the biofire(®) filmarray(®) pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low/middle-income setting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36628341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlac139
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderwesthuyzenm utilityofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelplusassayforsyndromictestingoflowerrespiratorytractinfectionsinalowmiddleincomesetting
AT samodienn utilityofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelplusassayforsyndromictestingoflowerrespiratorytractinfectionsinalowmiddleincomesetting
AT brinkaj utilityofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelplusassayforsyndromictestingoflowerrespiratorytractinfectionsinalowmiddleincomesetting
AT moodleyc utilityofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelplusassayforsyndromictestingoflowerrespiratorytractinfectionsinalowmiddleincomesetting