Cargando…

Neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury

With emerging applications of spinal cord electrical stimulation in restoring autonomic and motor function after spinal cord injury, understanding the neuroanatomical substrates of the human spinal cord after spinal cord injury using neuroimaging techniques can play a critical role in optimizing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mesbah, Samineh, Herrity, April, Ugiliweneza, Beatrice, Angeli, Claudia, Gerasimenko, Yury, Boakye, Maxwell, Harkema, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac330
_version_ 1784866652812214272
author Mesbah, Samineh
Herrity, April
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
Angeli, Claudia
Gerasimenko, Yury
Boakye, Maxwell
Harkema, Susan
author_facet Mesbah, Samineh
Herrity, April
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
Angeli, Claudia
Gerasimenko, Yury
Boakye, Maxwell
Harkema, Susan
author_sort Mesbah, Samineh
collection PubMed
description With emerging applications of spinal cord electrical stimulation in restoring autonomic and motor function after spinal cord injury, understanding the neuroanatomical substrates of the human spinal cord after spinal cord injury using neuroimaging techniques can play a critical role in optimizing the outcomes of these stimulation-based interventions. In this study, we have introduced a neuroimaging acquisition and analysis protocol of the spinal cord in order to identify: (i) spinal cord levels at the lumbosacral enlargement using nerve root tracing; (ii) variability in the neuroanatomical characteristics of the spinal cord among individuals; (iii) location of the epidural stimulation paddle electrode and contacts with respect to the spinal cord levels at lumbosacral enlargement; and (iv) the links between the anatomical levels of stimulation and the corresponding neurophysiological motor responses. Twelve individuals with chronic, motor complete spinal cord injury implanted with a spinal cord epidural stimulator were included in the study (age: 34 ± 10.9 years, sex: 10 males, 2 females, time since injury: 8.2 ± 9.9 years, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale: 6 A, 6 B). High-resolution MRI scans of the spinal cord were recorded pre-implant. An analysis of neuroanatomical substrates indicates that the length of the spinal column and spinal cord, location of the conus tip and the relationship between the spinal cord levels and vertebral levels, particularly at the lumbosacral enlargement, are variable across individuals. There is no statistically significant correlation between the length of the spinal column and the length of the spinal cord. The percentage of volumetric coverage of the lumbosacral spinal cord by the epidural stimulation paddle electrode ranges from 33.4 to 90.4% across participants. The location of the spinal cord levels with respect to the electrode contacts varies across individuals and impacts the recruitment patterns of neurophysiological responses. Finally, MRI-based spinal cord modelling can be used as a guide for the prediction and preplanning of optimum epidural stimulation paddle placement prior to the implant surgery to ensure maximizing functional outcomes. These findings highlight the crucial role that the neuroanatomical characteristics of the spinal cord specific to each individual play in achieving maximum functional benefits with spinal cord electrical stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9825531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98255312023-01-10 Neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury Mesbah, Samineh Herrity, April Ugiliweneza, Beatrice Angeli, Claudia Gerasimenko, Yury Boakye, Maxwell Harkema, Susan Brain Commun Original Article With emerging applications of spinal cord electrical stimulation in restoring autonomic and motor function after spinal cord injury, understanding the neuroanatomical substrates of the human spinal cord after spinal cord injury using neuroimaging techniques can play a critical role in optimizing the outcomes of these stimulation-based interventions. In this study, we have introduced a neuroimaging acquisition and analysis protocol of the spinal cord in order to identify: (i) spinal cord levels at the lumbosacral enlargement using nerve root tracing; (ii) variability in the neuroanatomical characteristics of the spinal cord among individuals; (iii) location of the epidural stimulation paddle electrode and contacts with respect to the spinal cord levels at lumbosacral enlargement; and (iv) the links between the anatomical levels of stimulation and the corresponding neurophysiological motor responses. Twelve individuals with chronic, motor complete spinal cord injury implanted with a spinal cord epidural stimulator were included in the study (age: 34 ± 10.9 years, sex: 10 males, 2 females, time since injury: 8.2 ± 9.9 years, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale: 6 A, 6 B). High-resolution MRI scans of the spinal cord were recorded pre-implant. An analysis of neuroanatomical substrates indicates that the length of the spinal column and spinal cord, location of the conus tip and the relationship between the spinal cord levels and vertebral levels, particularly at the lumbosacral enlargement, are variable across individuals. There is no statistically significant correlation between the length of the spinal column and the length of the spinal cord. The percentage of volumetric coverage of the lumbosacral spinal cord by the epidural stimulation paddle electrode ranges from 33.4 to 90.4% across participants. The location of the spinal cord levels with respect to the electrode contacts varies across individuals and impacts the recruitment patterns of neurophysiological responses. Finally, MRI-based spinal cord modelling can be used as a guide for the prediction and preplanning of optimum epidural stimulation paddle placement prior to the implant surgery to ensure maximizing functional outcomes. These findings highlight the crucial role that the neuroanatomical characteristics of the spinal cord specific to each individual play in achieving maximum functional benefits with spinal cord electrical stimulation. Oxford University Press 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9825531/ /pubmed/36632181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac330 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mesbah, Samineh
Herrity, April
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
Angeli, Claudia
Gerasimenko, Yury
Boakye, Maxwell
Harkema, Susan
Neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
title Neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
title_full Neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
title_fullStr Neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
title_full_unstemmed Neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
title_short Neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
title_sort neuroanatomical mapping of the lumbosacral spinal cord in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac330
work_keys_str_mv AT mesbahsamineh neuroanatomicalmappingofthelumbosacralspinalcordinindividualswithchronicspinalcordinjury
AT herrityapril neuroanatomicalmappingofthelumbosacralspinalcordinindividualswithchronicspinalcordinjury
AT ugiliwenezabeatrice neuroanatomicalmappingofthelumbosacralspinalcordinindividualswithchronicspinalcordinjury
AT angeliclaudia neuroanatomicalmappingofthelumbosacralspinalcordinindividualswithchronicspinalcordinjury
AT gerasimenkoyury neuroanatomicalmappingofthelumbosacralspinalcordinindividualswithchronicspinalcordinjury
AT boakyemaxwell neuroanatomicalmappingofthelumbosacralspinalcordinindividualswithchronicspinalcordinjury
AT harkemasusan neuroanatomicalmappingofthelumbosacralspinalcordinindividualswithchronicspinalcordinjury