Cargando…

Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review

The number of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who have persisting angina pectoris despite optimal medical treatment known as refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is growing. Current estimates indicate that 5–10% of patients with stable CAD have RAP. In absolute numbers, there are 50 000–100...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira, van der Gaag, Antal, Teeuwen, Koen, van Suijlekom, Hans, Wijnbergen, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeac083
_version_ 1784866702276689920
author Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira
van der Gaag, Antal
Teeuwen, Koen
van Suijlekom, Hans
Wijnbergen, Inge
author_facet Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira
van der Gaag, Antal
Teeuwen, Koen
van Suijlekom, Hans
Wijnbergen, Inge
author_sort Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira
collection PubMed
description The number of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who have persisting angina pectoris despite optimal medical treatment known as refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is growing. Current estimates indicate that 5–10% of patients with stable CAD have RAP. In absolute numbers, there are 50 000–100 000 new cases of RAP each year in the USA and 30 000–50 000 new cases each year in Europe. The term RAP was formulated in 2002. RAP is defined as a chronic disease (more than 3 months) characterized by diffuse CAD in the presence of proven ischaemia which is not amendable to a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty, or coronary bypass surgery. There are currently few treatment options for patients with RAP. One such last-resort treatment option is spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with a Class of recommendation IIB, level of evidence B in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. The aim of this review is to give an overview of neuromodulation as treatment modality for patients with RAP. A comprehensive overview is given on the history, proposed mechanism of action, safety, efficacy, and current use of SCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9825802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98258022023-01-10 Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira van der Gaag, Antal Teeuwen, Koen van Suijlekom, Hans Wijnbergen, Inge Eur Heart J Open Original Article The number of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who have persisting angina pectoris despite optimal medical treatment known as refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is growing. Current estimates indicate that 5–10% of patients with stable CAD have RAP. In absolute numbers, there are 50 000–100 000 new cases of RAP each year in the USA and 30 000–50 000 new cases each year in Europe. The term RAP was formulated in 2002. RAP is defined as a chronic disease (more than 3 months) characterized by diffuse CAD in the presence of proven ischaemia which is not amendable to a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty, or coronary bypass surgery. There are currently few treatment options for patients with RAP. One such last-resort treatment option is spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with a Class of recommendation IIB, level of evidence B in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. The aim of this review is to give an overview of neuromodulation as treatment modality for patients with RAP. A comprehensive overview is given on the history, proposed mechanism of action, safety, efficacy, and current use of SCS. Oxford University Press 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9825802/ /pubmed/36632476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeac083 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira
van der Gaag, Antal
Teeuwen, Koen
van Suijlekom, Hans
Wijnbergen, Inge
Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review
title Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review
title_full Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review
title_fullStr Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review
title_full_unstemmed Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review
title_short Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review
title_sort neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeac083
work_keys_str_mv AT vervaatfabienneelvira neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview
AT vandergaagantal neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview
AT teeuwenkoen neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview
AT vansuijlekomhans neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview
AT wijnbergeninge neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview