Cargando…
Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review
The number of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who have persisting angina pectoris despite optimal medical treatment known as refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is growing. Current estimates indicate that 5–10% of patients with stable CAD have RAP. In absolute numbers, there are 50 000–100...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeac083 |
_version_ | 1784866702276689920 |
---|---|
author | Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira van der Gaag, Antal Teeuwen, Koen van Suijlekom, Hans Wijnbergen, Inge |
author_facet | Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira van der Gaag, Antal Teeuwen, Koen van Suijlekom, Hans Wijnbergen, Inge |
author_sort | Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira |
collection | PubMed |
description | The number of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who have persisting angina pectoris despite optimal medical treatment known as refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is growing. Current estimates indicate that 5–10% of patients with stable CAD have RAP. In absolute numbers, there are 50 000–100 000 new cases of RAP each year in the USA and 30 000–50 000 new cases each year in Europe. The term RAP was formulated in 2002. RAP is defined as a chronic disease (more than 3 months) characterized by diffuse CAD in the presence of proven ischaemia which is not amendable to a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty, or coronary bypass surgery. There are currently few treatment options for patients with RAP. One such last-resort treatment option is spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with a Class of recommendation IIB, level of evidence B in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. The aim of this review is to give an overview of neuromodulation as treatment modality for patients with RAP. A comprehensive overview is given on the history, proposed mechanism of action, safety, efficacy, and current use of SCS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9825802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98258022023-01-10 Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira van der Gaag, Antal Teeuwen, Koen van Suijlekom, Hans Wijnbergen, Inge Eur Heart J Open Original Article The number of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who have persisting angina pectoris despite optimal medical treatment known as refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is growing. Current estimates indicate that 5–10% of patients with stable CAD have RAP. In absolute numbers, there are 50 000–100 000 new cases of RAP each year in the USA and 30 000–50 000 new cases each year in Europe. The term RAP was formulated in 2002. RAP is defined as a chronic disease (more than 3 months) characterized by diffuse CAD in the presence of proven ischaemia which is not amendable to a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty, or coronary bypass surgery. There are currently few treatment options for patients with RAP. One such last-resort treatment option is spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with a Class of recommendation IIB, level of evidence B in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. The aim of this review is to give an overview of neuromodulation as treatment modality for patients with RAP. A comprehensive overview is given on the history, proposed mechanism of action, safety, efficacy, and current use of SCS. Oxford University Press 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9825802/ /pubmed/36632476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeac083 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vervaat, Fabienne Elvira van der Gaag, Antal Teeuwen, Koen van Suijlekom, Hans Wijnbergen, Inge Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review |
title | Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review |
title_full | Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review |
title_fullStr | Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review |
title_short | Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review |
title_sort | neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeac083 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vervaatfabienneelvira neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview AT vandergaagantal neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview AT teeuwenkoen neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview AT vansuijlekomhans neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview AT wijnbergeninge neuromodulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisareview |