Cargando…
A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study
AIM: To validate risk factors and a nomogram prediction model for the failure of a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) in a Chinese population. METHODS: We included women who tried TOLAC between January 2017 and May 2019, grouped according to the success/failure of TOLAC. The patients were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36055678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15398 |
_version_ | 1784866732967460864 |
---|---|
author | Li, Hua Sheng, Wen Cai, Min Chen, Qiuling Lin, Beibei Zhang, Weishe Li, Wenxia |
author_facet | Li, Hua Sheng, Wen Cai, Min Chen, Qiuling Lin, Beibei Zhang, Weishe Li, Wenxia |
author_sort | Li, Hua |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To validate risk factors and a nomogram prediction model for the failure of a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) in a Chinese population. METHODS: We included women who tried TOLAC between January 2017 and May 2019, grouped according to the success/failure of TOLAC. The patients were randomized 3:1 into the development and validation sets. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop a nomogram prediction model for TOLAC failure. RESULTS: In total, 535 (86.3%) of the women (n = 620) aged 29–34 years had a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). All women had a fully healed previous uterine incision. The univariable analyses showed that the cephalopelvic score (p < 0.001), BMI (p = 0.001), full engagement into the pelvis (p < 0.001), Bishop cervical maturity score (p < 0.001), and estimated fetal weight at admission (p < 0.001) could enter the multivariable model. Furthermore, the multivariable analysis showed that the cephalopelvic score (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.23–0.77, p = 0.005), full engagement in the pelvis (OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.08–0.33, p < 0.001), and Bishop cervical maturity score (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.35–0.59, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of the failure of TOLAC. CONCLUSION: This study proposes a nomogram that can assess the risk of failure of TOLAC in Chinese pregnant women. The statistical model could help clinicians know the likelihood of successful TOLAC in the clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9825937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98259372023-01-09 A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study Li, Hua Sheng, Wen Cai, Min Chen, Qiuling Lin, Beibei Zhang, Weishe Li, Wenxia J Obstet Gynaecol Res Original Articles AIM: To validate risk factors and a nomogram prediction model for the failure of a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) in a Chinese population. METHODS: We included women who tried TOLAC between January 2017 and May 2019, grouped according to the success/failure of TOLAC. The patients were randomized 3:1 into the development and validation sets. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop a nomogram prediction model for TOLAC failure. RESULTS: In total, 535 (86.3%) of the women (n = 620) aged 29–34 years had a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). All women had a fully healed previous uterine incision. The univariable analyses showed that the cephalopelvic score (p < 0.001), BMI (p = 0.001), full engagement into the pelvis (p < 0.001), Bishop cervical maturity score (p < 0.001), and estimated fetal weight at admission (p < 0.001) could enter the multivariable model. Furthermore, the multivariable analysis showed that the cephalopelvic score (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.23–0.77, p = 0.005), full engagement in the pelvis (OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.08–0.33, p < 0.001), and Bishop cervical maturity score (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.35–0.59, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of the failure of TOLAC. CONCLUSION: This study proposes a nomogram that can assess the risk of failure of TOLAC in Chinese pregnant women. The statistical model could help clinicians know the likelihood of successful TOLAC in the clinical setting. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-09-02 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9825937/ /pubmed/36055678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15398 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Li, Hua Sheng, Wen Cai, Min Chen, Qiuling Lin, Beibei Zhang, Weishe Li, Wenxia A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study |
title | A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full | A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study |
title_short | A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36055678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lihua apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shengwen apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT caimin apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT chenqiuling apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT linbeibei apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhangweishe apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT liwenxia apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lihua predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shengwen predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT caimin predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT chenqiuling predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT linbeibei predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhangweishe predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy AT liwenxia predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy |