Cargando…

A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study

AIM: To validate risk factors and a nomogram prediction model for the failure of a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) in a Chinese population. METHODS: We included women who tried TOLAC between January 2017 and May 2019, grouped according to the success/failure of TOLAC. The patients were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hua, Sheng, Wen, Cai, Min, Chen, Qiuling, Lin, Beibei, Zhang, Weishe, Li, Wenxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36055678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15398
_version_ 1784866732967460864
author Li, Hua
Sheng, Wen
Cai, Min
Chen, Qiuling
Lin, Beibei
Zhang, Weishe
Li, Wenxia
author_facet Li, Hua
Sheng, Wen
Cai, Min
Chen, Qiuling
Lin, Beibei
Zhang, Weishe
Li, Wenxia
author_sort Li, Hua
collection PubMed
description AIM: To validate risk factors and a nomogram prediction model for the failure of a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) in a Chinese population. METHODS: We included women who tried TOLAC between January 2017 and May 2019, grouped according to the success/failure of TOLAC. The patients were randomized 3:1 into the development and validation sets. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop a nomogram prediction model for TOLAC failure. RESULTS: In total, 535 (86.3%) of the women (n = 620) aged 29–34 years had a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). All women had a fully healed previous uterine incision. The univariable analyses showed that the cephalopelvic score (p < 0.001), BMI (p = 0.001), full engagement into the pelvis (p < 0.001), Bishop cervical maturity score (p < 0.001), and estimated fetal weight at admission (p < 0.001) could enter the multivariable model. Furthermore, the multivariable analysis showed that the cephalopelvic score (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.23–0.77, p = 0.005), full engagement in the pelvis (OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.08–0.33, p < 0.001), and Bishop cervical maturity score (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.35–0.59, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of the failure of TOLAC. CONCLUSION: This study proposes a nomogram that can assess the risk of failure of TOLAC in Chinese pregnant women. The statistical model could help clinicians know the likelihood of successful TOLAC in the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9825937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98259372023-01-09 A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study Li, Hua Sheng, Wen Cai, Min Chen, Qiuling Lin, Beibei Zhang, Weishe Li, Wenxia J Obstet Gynaecol Res Original Articles AIM: To validate risk factors and a nomogram prediction model for the failure of a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) in a Chinese population. METHODS: We included women who tried TOLAC between January 2017 and May 2019, grouped according to the success/failure of TOLAC. The patients were randomized 3:1 into the development and validation sets. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop a nomogram prediction model for TOLAC failure. RESULTS: In total, 535 (86.3%) of the women (n = 620) aged 29–34 years had a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). All women had a fully healed previous uterine incision. The univariable analyses showed that the cephalopelvic score (p < 0.001), BMI (p = 0.001), full engagement into the pelvis (p < 0.001), Bishop cervical maturity score (p < 0.001), and estimated fetal weight at admission (p < 0.001) could enter the multivariable model. Furthermore, the multivariable analysis showed that the cephalopelvic score (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.23–0.77, p = 0.005), full engagement in the pelvis (OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.08–0.33, p < 0.001), and Bishop cervical maturity score (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.35–0.59, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of the failure of TOLAC. CONCLUSION: This study proposes a nomogram that can assess the risk of failure of TOLAC in Chinese pregnant women. The statistical model could help clinicians know the likelihood of successful TOLAC in the clinical setting. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-09-02 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9825937/ /pubmed/36055678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15398 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Li, Hua
Sheng, Wen
Cai, Min
Chen, Qiuling
Lin, Beibei
Zhang, Weishe
Li, Wenxia
A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study
title A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study
title_full A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study
title_short A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36055678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15398
work_keys_str_mv AT lihua apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shengwen apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT caimin apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenqiuling apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT linbeibei apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangweishe apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liwenxia apredictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lihua predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shengwen predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT caimin predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenqiuling predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT linbeibei predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangweishe predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liwenxia predictivenomogramforafailedtrialoflaboraftercesareanaretrospectivecohortstudy