Cargando…

From protection to non‐protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain

BACKGROUND: Movement and posture are commonly believed to relate to low back pain (LBP). Yet, we know little about how people make sense of the relationship between their LBP, movement and posture, particularly after recovery. We aimed to qualitatively explore this understanding, how it changes and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wernli, Kevin, Smith, Anne, Coll, Fiona, Campbell, Amity, Kent, Peter, O'Sullivan, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2022
_version_ 1784866767364947968
author Wernli, Kevin
Smith, Anne
Coll, Fiona
Campbell, Amity
Kent, Peter
O'Sullivan, Peter
author_facet Wernli, Kevin
Smith, Anne
Coll, Fiona
Campbell, Amity
Kent, Peter
O'Sullivan, Peter
author_sort Wernli, Kevin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Movement and posture are commonly believed to relate to low back pain (LBP). Yet, we know little about how people make sense of the relationship between their LBP, movement and posture, particularly after recovery. We aimed to qualitatively explore this understanding, how it changes and how it relates to quantitative changes. METHODS: A mixed method study in the context of an existing single‐case design involving 12 people with disabling non‐specific LBP. Interviews were conducted before and after a 12‐week physiotherapy‐led Cognitive Functional Therapy intervention, and qualitative findings from these were integrated with individualized, quantitative measures of movement, posture, psychological factors, pain and activity limitation. RESULTS: Strong beliefs about movement and posture were identified during the baseline interviews. Lived experiences of tension and stiffness characterized the embodiment of ‘nonconscious protection’, while healthcare and societal messages prompted pain‐related fear and ‘conscious protection’. Through varied journeys, most participants reported improvements over time with less protective movement and postural strategies. For some, being less protective required focused attention (‘conscious non‐protection’), but most returned to automatic, normal and fearless patterns (‘nonconscious non‐protection’), forgetting about their LBP. One participant reported no meaningful shift, remaining protective. Greater spinal range, faster movement, more relaxed postures and less back muscle EMG accompanied positive changes in self‐report factors. CONCLUSION: The findings offer a framework for understanding how people make sense of movement and posture during the process of recovery from persistent, disabling non‐specific LBP. This involved a re‐conceptualisation of movement and posture, from threatening, to therapeutic. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings from qualitative interviews before and after a Cognitive Functional Therapy intervention in 12 people with disabling low back pain highlighted an individualized recovery journey from conscious and nonconscious protection to conscious non‐protection for some, and nonconscious non‐protection for many. Pre and post‐quantitative measures of movement, posture, psychological factors, pain and activity limitation integrated well with the qualitative findings. The findings suggest movement and posture may form part of a multidimensional pain schema.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9826080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98260802023-01-09 From protection to non‐protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain Wernli, Kevin Smith, Anne Coll, Fiona Campbell, Amity Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, Peter Eur J Pain Original Articles BACKGROUND: Movement and posture are commonly believed to relate to low back pain (LBP). Yet, we know little about how people make sense of the relationship between their LBP, movement and posture, particularly after recovery. We aimed to qualitatively explore this understanding, how it changes and how it relates to quantitative changes. METHODS: A mixed method study in the context of an existing single‐case design involving 12 people with disabling non‐specific LBP. Interviews were conducted before and after a 12‐week physiotherapy‐led Cognitive Functional Therapy intervention, and qualitative findings from these were integrated with individualized, quantitative measures of movement, posture, psychological factors, pain and activity limitation. RESULTS: Strong beliefs about movement and posture were identified during the baseline interviews. Lived experiences of tension and stiffness characterized the embodiment of ‘nonconscious protection’, while healthcare and societal messages prompted pain‐related fear and ‘conscious protection’. Through varied journeys, most participants reported improvements over time with less protective movement and postural strategies. For some, being less protective required focused attention (‘conscious non‐protection’), but most returned to automatic, normal and fearless patterns (‘nonconscious non‐protection’), forgetting about their LBP. One participant reported no meaningful shift, remaining protective. Greater spinal range, faster movement, more relaxed postures and less back muscle EMG accompanied positive changes in self‐report factors. CONCLUSION: The findings offer a framework for understanding how people make sense of movement and posture during the process of recovery from persistent, disabling non‐specific LBP. This involved a re‐conceptualisation of movement and posture, from threatening, to therapeutic. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings from qualitative interviews before and after a Cognitive Functional Therapy intervention in 12 people with disabling low back pain highlighted an individualized recovery journey from conscious and nonconscious protection to conscious non‐protection for some, and nonconscious non‐protection for many. Pre and post‐quantitative measures of movement, posture, psychological factors, pain and activity limitation integrated well with the qualitative findings. The findings suggest movement and posture may form part of a multidimensional pain schema. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-05 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9826080/ /pubmed/35959703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2022 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC ®. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wernli, Kevin
Smith, Anne
Coll, Fiona
Campbell, Amity
Kent, Peter
O'Sullivan, Peter
From protection to non‐protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain
title From protection to non‐protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain
title_full From protection to non‐protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain
title_fullStr From protection to non‐protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain
title_full_unstemmed From protection to non‐protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain
title_short From protection to non‐protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain
title_sort from protection to non‐protection: a mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2022
work_keys_str_mv AT wernlikevin fromprotectiontononprotectionamixedmethodsstudyinvestigatingmovementpostureandrecoveryfromdisablinglowbackpain
AT smithanne fromprotectiontononprotectionamixedmethodsstudyinvestigatingmovementpostureandrecoveryfromdisablinglowbackpain
AT collfiona fromprotectiontononprotectionamixedmethodsstudyinvestigatingmovementpostureandrecoveryfromdisablinglowbackpain
AT campbellamity fromprotectiontononprotectionamixedmethodsstudyinvestigatingmovementpostureandrecoveryfromdisablinglowbackpain
AT kentpeter fromprotectiontononprotectionamixedmethodsstudyinvestigatingmovementpostureandrecoveryfromdisablinglowbackpain
AT osullivanpeter fromprotectiontononprotectionamixedmethodsstudyinvestigatingmovementpostureandrecoveryfromdisablinglowbackpain