Cargando…
Profiling the response to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in children with cystic between fibrosis and new insight from a French‐Italian real‐life cohort
INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials for CFTR modulators consider mean changes of clinical status at the cohort level, and thus fail to assess the heterogeneity of the response. We aimed to study the different response profiles to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor according to age in children with cystic fibrosis (CF)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.26123 |
_version_ | 1784866784878264320 |
---|---|
author | Cornet, Matthieu Robin, Geneviève Ciciriello, Fabiana Bihouee, Tiphaine Marguet, Christophe Roy, Valérie Lebourgeois, Muriel Chedevergne, Frédérique Bonnel, Anne Sophie Kelly, Mairead Reix, Philippe Lucidi, Vincenzina Stoven, Véronique Sermet‐Gaudelus, Isabelle |
author_facet | Cornet, Matthieu Robin, Geneviève Ciciriello, Fabiana Bihouee, Tiphaine Marguet, Christophe Roy, Valérie Lebourgeois, Muriel Chedevergne, Frédérique Bonnel, Anne Sophie Kelly, Mairead Reix, Philippe Lucidi, Vincenzina Stoven, Véronique Sermet‐Gaudelus, Isabelle |
author_sort | Cornet, Matthieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials for CFTR modulators consider mean changes of clinical status at the cohort level, and thus fail to assess the heterogeneity of the response. We aimed to study the different response profiles to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor according to age in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: A mathematical framework, including principal component analysis, data clustering, and data completion, was applied to a multicenter cohort of 112 children aged 6–18 years, treated with lumacaftor‐ivacaftor. Studied parameters at baseline and 6 months included body mass index (BMI), number of days of antibiotics (ATB), Sweat test (ST), forced expiratory volume in 1 s expressed in percentage predicted (ppFEV(1)), forced vital capacity (ppFVC), and forced expiratory flow at 25%–75% of FVC (ppFEF(25–75)). RESULTS: Change in ppFEV(1) was the most significant parameter in characterizing response heterogeneity among the 12–18‐year‐old patients. Patients with minimal changes in ppFEV(1) were further separated by change in BMI and ATB course. In the 6–12‐year‐old children both BMI and ppFEV(1) evolution were the most relevant. ST change was not associated with a clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: Change in ppFEV(1), BMI, and ATB course are the most relevant outcomes to discriminate clinical response profiles in children treated with lumacaftor‐ivacaftor. Prepubertal and pubertal children display different response profiles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9826158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98261582023-01-09 Profiling the response to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in children with cystic between fibrosis and new insight from a French‐Italian real‐life cohort Cornet, Matthieu Robin, Geneviève Ciciriello, Fabiana Bihouee, Tiphaine Marguet, Christophe Roy, Valérie Lebourgeois, Muriel Chedevergne, Frédérique Bonnel, Anne Sophie Kelly, Mairead Reix, Philippe Lucidi, Vincenzina Stoven, Véronique Sermet‐Gaudelus, Isabelle Pediatr Pulmonol Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials for CFTR modulators consider mean changes of clinical status at the cohort level, and thus fail to assess the heterogeneity of the response. We aimed to study the different response profiles to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor according to age in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: A mathematical framework, including principal component analysis, data clustering, and data completion, was applied to a multicenter cohort of 112 children aged 6–18 years, treated with lumacaftor‐ivacaftor. Studied parameters at baseline and 6 months included body mass index (BMI), number of days of antibiotics (ATB), Sweat test (ST), forced expiratory volume in 1 s expressed in percentage predicted (ppFEV(1)), forced vital capacity (ppFVC), and forced expiratory flow at 25%–75% of FVC (ppFEF(25–75)). RESULTS: Change in ppFEV(1) was the most significant parameter in characterizing response heterogeneity among the 12–18‐year‐old patients. Patients with minimal changes in ppFEV(1) were further separated by change in BMI and ATB course. In the 6–12‐year‐old children both BMI and ppFEV(1) evolution were the most relevant. ST change was not associated with a clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: Change in ppFEV(1), BMI, and ATB course are the most relevant outcomes to discriminate clinical response profiles in children treated with lumacaftor‐ivacaftor. Prepubertal and pubertal children display different response profiles. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-06 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9826158/ /pubmed/35996214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.26123 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pediatric Pulmonology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Cornet, Matthieu Robin, Geneviève Ciciriello, Fabiana Bihouee, Tiphaine Marguet, Christophe Roy, Valérie Lebourgeois, Muriel Chedevergne, Frédérique Bonnel, Anne Sophie Kelly, Mairead Reix, Philippe Lucidi, Vincenzina Stoven, Véronique Sermet‐Gaudelus, Isabelle Profiling the response to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in children with cystic between fibrosis and new insight from a French‐Italian real‐life cohort |
title | Profiling the response to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in children with cystic between fibrosis and new insight from a French‐Italian real‐life cohort |
title_full | Profiling the response to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in children with cystic between fibrosis and new insight from a French‐Italian real‐life cohort |
title_fullStr | Profiling the response to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in children with cystic between fibrosis and new insight from a French‐Italian real‐life cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Profiling the response to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in children with cystic between fibrosis and new insight from a French‐Italian real‐life cohort |
title_short | Profiling the response to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in children with cystic between fibrosis and new insight from a French‐Italian real‐life cohort |
title_sort | profiling the response to lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in children with cystic between fibrosis and new insight from a french‐italian real‐life cohort |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.26123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cornetmatthieu profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT robingenevieve profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT ciciriellofabiana profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT bihoueetiphaine profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT marguetchristophe profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT royvalerie profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT lebourgeoismuriel profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT chedevergnefrederique profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT bonnelannesophie profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT kellymairead profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT reixphilippe profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT lucidivincenzina profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT stovenveronique profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort AT sermetgaudelusisabelle profilingtheresponsetolumacaftorivacaftorinchildrenwithcysticbetweenfibrosisandnewinsightfromafrenchitalianreallifecohort |