Cargando…

Boosting ethics review capacity in public health emergency situations: Co‐creation of a training model for French‐speaking research ethics committees

BACKGROUND: Ethics review preparedness is a major foundation for national effective response to public health emergencies, because it promotes pertinent research and enhances the protection of research participants and communities. In low‐income countries, it can also promote equitable research part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maketa, Vivi, Luzolo, Flory, Muhindo Mavoko, Hypolite, Claeys, Yves, Munday, Felicien, Yemesi Benge, Robert, Bongo Pasi, Willy, Mankindu, Darius, Mampunza, Samuel, Lukanu, Philippe, Kasongo, Muteho, Ntabe Namegabe, Edmond, Kambale Karafuli, Leopold, Phanzu Mavinga, Delphin, Milandu Massamba, Emmanuel, Muaka Khoso, César‐Augustin, Ravinetto, Raffaella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13815
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Ethics review preparedness is a major foundation for national effective response to public health emergencies, because it promotes pertinent research and enhances the protection of research participants and communities. In low‐income countries, it can also promote equitable research partnership. However, most relevant literature is in English and not easily accessible for the members of research ethics committees in French‐speaking African countries. METHODS: A training module in French, addressing the issue of research ethics review during outbreaks and other public health emergencies, was designed based on a non‐systematic literature review, and in order to be complementary to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) national guidelines for ethics review. The module was administered to 42 members of the five ethics committees in DRC that expressed their interest for the training. RESULT: This training, co‐designed with local stakeholders, in the local working language and taking into account local circumstances and regulation, provided participants with up‐to‐date insights of research ethics (and research ethics preparedness) in public health emergencies. It resulted in rich reflection and knowledge‐sharing on good practices across the ethics committees. CONCLUSION: As most participating ethics committees do not have yet explicit standard operating procedures for expedited review of protocols submitted in emergency situations, this would be a next important step to facilitate emergency reviews in the most efficient way.