Cargando…

FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity

OBJECTIVES: Tinnitus is a complex and debilitating phenomenon with potentially significant implications on quality of life. New presentations can be resource and time intensive for clinicians. Validated comprehensive tinnitus questionnaires may lack practical utility in the high‐volume clinical sett...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Connell, James, Harrison, Ella, Bassiouni, Ahmed, Sahota, Raguwinder, Laden, Stephanie, Carney, Andrew Simon, Foreman, Andrew, Krishnan, Suren, O'Brien, Sinead, Hodge, John‐Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/coa.13973
_version_ 1784866798086127616
author Connell, James
Harrison, Ella
Bassiouni, Ahmed
Sahota, Raguwinder
Laden, Stephanie
Carney, Andrew Simon
Foreman, Andrew
Krishnan, Suren
O'Brien, Sinead
Hodge, John‐Charles
author_facet Connell, James
Harrison, Ella
Bassiouni, Ahmed
Sahota, Raguwinder
Laden, Stephanie
Carney, Andrew Simon
Foreman, Andrew
Krishnan, Suren
O'Brien, Sinead
Hodge, John‐Charles
author_sort Connell, James
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Tinnitus is a complex and debilitating phenomenon with potentially significant implications on quality of life. New presentations can be resource and time intensive for clinicians. Validated comprehensive tinnitus questionnaires may lack practical utility in the high‐volume clinical setting. Concise, targeted questionnaires may offer an efficient alternative. This study aimed to assess the validity of the FiveQ, a novel five question construct designed to measure tinnitus severity. Convergent validity was assessed through correlating FiveQ against two comprehensive validated questionnaires, the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study with prospective recruitment. The 117 voluntarily recruited participants completed the FiveQ, THI and THQ questionnaires. Results were comparatively analysed. SETTING: Recruitment was via electronic and print media, audiology clinics and public and private otolaryngology outpatient clinics. Surveys were completed electronically. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the public aged over 18 with subjective tinnitus were invited to participate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: Analyses for establishing the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, explorary factor analysis, and responsiveness of FiveQ was performed. RESULTS: FiveQ demonstrated a high positive correlation with both the THI (r = 0.773, p < .001) and THQ (r = 0.808, p < .001). Internal consistency for FiveQ reached an acceptable threshold (Cronbach's alpha 0.86). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that one latent factor underlies the five items of the FiveQ. FiveQ demonstrated better responsiveness than both the THI and THQ after a 6 week interval repeat measurement. CONCLUSION: FiveQ demonstrated high‐positive correlations with existing validated tinnitus questionnaires as well as acceptable internal consistency and factor analysis. The concise construct of FiveQ allows clinicians to efficiently estimate tinnitus severity, target treatment towards dominant symptoms and establish a reliable estimation of treatment response following interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9826215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98262152023-01-09 FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity Connell, James Harrison, Ella Bassiouni, Ahmed Sahota, Raguwinder Laden, Stephanie Carney, Andrew Simon Foreman, Andrew Krishnan, Suren O'Brien, Sinead Hodge, John‐Charles Clin Otolaryngol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Tinnitus is a complex and debilitating phenomenon with potentially significant implications on quality of life. New presentations can be resource and time intensive for clinicians. Validated comprehensive tinnitus questionnaires may lack practical utility in the high‐volume clinical setting. Concise, targeted questionnaires may offer an efficient alternative. This study aimed to assess the validity of the FiveQ, a novel five question construct designed to measure tinnitus severity. Convergent validity was assessed through correlating FiveQ against two comprehensive validated questionnaires, the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study with prospective recruitment. The 117 voluntarily recruited participants completed the FiveQ, THI and THQ questionnaires. Results were comparatively analysed. SETTING: Recruitment was via electronic and print media, audiology clinics and public and private otolaryngology outpatient clinics. Surveys were completed electronically. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the public aged over 18 with subjective tinnitus were invited to participate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: Analyses for establishing the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, explorary factor analysis, and responsiveness of FiveQ was performed. RESULTS: FiveQ demonstrated a high positive correlation with both the THI (r = 0.773, p < .001) and THQ (r = 0.808, p < .001). Internal consistency for FiveQ reached an acceptable threshold (Cronbach's alpha 0.86). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that one latent factor underlies the five items of the FiveQ. FiveQ demonstrated better responsiveness than both the THI and THQ after a 6 week interval repeat measurement. CONCLUSION: FiveQ demonstrated high‐positive correlations with existing validated tinnitus questionnaires as well as acceptable internal consistency and factor analysis. The concise construct of FiveQ allows clinicians to efficiently estimate tinnitus severity, target treatment towards dominant symptoms and establish a reliable estimation of treatment response following interventions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-02 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9826215/ /pubmed/35996981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/coa.13973 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Otolaryngology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Connell, James
Harrison, Ella
Bassiouni, Ahmed
Sahota, Raguwinder
Laden, Stephanie
Carney, Andrew Simon
Foreman, Andrew
Krishnan, Suren
O'Brien, Sinead
Hodge, John‐Charles
FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity
title FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity
title_full FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity
title_fullStr FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity
title_full_unstemmed FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity
title_short FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity
title_sort fiveq: a new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/coa.13973
work_keys_str_mv AT connelljames fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity
AT harrisonella fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity
AT bassiouniahmed fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity
AT sahotaraguwinder fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity
AT ladenstephanie fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity
AT carneyandrewsimon fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity
AT foremanandrew fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity
AT krishnansuren fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity
AT obriensinead fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity
AT hodgejohncharles fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity