Cargando…
FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity
OBJECTIVES: Tinnitus is a complex and debilitating phenomenon with potentially significant implications on quality of life. New presentations can be resource and time intensive for clinicians. Validated comprehensive tinnitus questionnaires may lack practical utility in the high‐volume clinical sett...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/coa.13973 |
_version_ | 1784866798086127616 |
---|---|
author | Connell, James Harrison, Ella Bassiouni, Ahmed Sahota, Raguwinder Laden, Stephanie Carney, Andrew Simon Foreman, Andrew Krishnan, Suren O'Brien, Sinead Hodge, John‐Charles |
author_facet | Connell, James Harrison, Ella Bassiouni, Ahmed Sahota, Raguwinder Laden, Stephanie Carney, Andrew Simon Foreman, Andrew Krishnan, Suren O'Brien, Sinead Hodge, John‐Charles |
author_sort | Connell, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Tinnitus is a complex and debilitating phenomenon with potentially significant implications on quality of life. New presentations can be resource and time intensive for clinicians. Validated comprehensive tinnitus questionnaires may lack practical utility in the high‐volume clinical setting. Concise, targeted questionnaires may offer an efficient alternative. This study aimed to assess the validity of the FiveQ, a novel five question construct designed to measure tinnitus severity. Convergent validity was assessed through correlating FiveQ against two comprehensive validated questionnaires, the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study with prospective recruitment. The 117 voluntarily recruited participants completed the FiveQ, THI and THQ questionnaires. Results were comparatively analysed. SETTING: Recruitment was via electronic and print media, audiology clinics and public and private otolaryngology outpatient clinics. Surveys were completed electronically. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the public aged over 18 with subjective tinnitus were invited to participate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: Analyses for establishing the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, explorary factor analysis, and responsiveness of FiveQ was performed. RESULTS: FiveQ demonstrated a high positive correlation with both the THI (r = 0.773, p < .001) and THQ (r = 0.808, p < .001). Internal consistency for FiveQ reached an acceptable threshold (Cronbach's alpha 0.86). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that one latent factor underlies the five items of the FiveQ. FiveQ demonstrated better responsiveness than both the THI and THQ after a 6 week interval repeat measurement. CONCLUSION: FiveQ demonstrated high‐positive correlations with existing validated tinnitus questionnaires as well as acceptable internal consistency and factor analysis. The concise construct of FiveQ allows clinicians to efficiently estimate tinnitus severity, target treatment towards dominant symptoms and establish a reliable estimation of treatment response following interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9826215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98262152023-01-09 FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity Connell, James Harrison, Ella Bassiouni, Ahmed Sahota, Raguwinder Laden, Stephanie Carney, Andrew Simon Foreman, Andrew Krishnan, Suren O'Brien, Sinead Hodge, John‐Charles Clin Otolaryngol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Tinnitus is a complex and debilitating phenomenon with potentially significant implications on quality of life. New presentations can be resource and time intensive for clinicians. Validated comprehensive tinnitus questionnaires may lack practical utility in the high‐volume clinical setting. Concise, targeted questionnaires may offer an efficient alternative. This study aimed to assess the validity of the FiveQ, a novel five question construct designed to measure tinnitus severity. Convergent validity was assessed through correlating FiveQ against two comprehensive validated questionnaires, the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study with prospective recruitment. The 117 voluntarily recruited participants completed the FiveQ, THI and THQ questionnaires. Results were comparatively analysed. SETTING: Recruitment was via electronic and print media, audiology clinics and public and private otolaryngology outpatient clinics. Surveys were completed electronically. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the public aged over 18 with subjective tinnitus were invited to participate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: Analyses for establishing the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, explorary factor analysis, and responsiveness of FiveQ was performed. RESULTS: FiveQ demonstrated a high positive correlation with both the THI (r = 0.773, p < .001) and THQ (r = 0.808, p < .001). Internal consistency for FiveQ reached an acceptable threshold (Cronbach's alpha 0.86). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that one latent factor underlies the five items of the FiveQ. FiveQ demonstrated better responsiveness than both the THI and THQ after a 6 week interval repeat measurement. CONCLUSION: FiveQ demonstrated high‐positive correlations with existing validated tinnitus questionnaires as well as acceptable internal consistency and factor analysis. The concise construct of FiveQ allows clinicians to efficiently estimate tinnitus severity, target treatment towards dominant symptoms and establish a reliable estimation of treatment response following interventions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-02 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9826215/ /pubmed/35996981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/coa.13973 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Otolaryngology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Connell, James Harrison, Ella Bassiouni, Ahmed Sahota, Raguwinder Laden, Stephanie Carney, Andrew Simon Foreman, Andrew Krishnan, Suren O'Brien, Sinead Hodge, John‐Charles FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity |
title |
FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity |
title_full |
FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity |
title_fullStr |
FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity |
title_full_unstemmed |
FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity |
title_short |
FiveQ: A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity |
title_sort | fiveq: a new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/coa.13973 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT connelljames fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity AT harrisonella fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity AT bassiouniahmed fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity AT sahotaraguwinder fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity AT ladenstephanie fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity AT carneyandrewsimon fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity AT foremanandrew fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity AT krishnansuren fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity AT obriensinead fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity AT hodgejohncharles fiveqaneweasytousevalidatedclinicalinstrumentfortinnitusseverity |